world peace

Toxic TV Syndrome is no Myth

2008-10-03T04:32:00.000-07:00

Toxic TV is for Real!

This article from the UK's Guardian newspaper (and if even THEY (arch NWOers) admit to this, it's doubtless even WORSE than they state here) proves beyond any reasonable doubt that the intolerable damage to our society that we see around us in all its various forms arises primarily from the poisonous cultural influences propagated by Television (96% Jewish-owned and/or influenced in the West). The following is the nearest thing to a laboratory test of the effects of the introduction of TV on a society that was previously the nearest thing on earth to a perfect utopia. Read now how the introduction of the Jewscreen totally destroyed the social capital of this previously wholesome little country in a matter of just a few short months.

This is one of the most important articles on the causes of antisocial behaviour ever published on WP, so please circulate it as widely as possible. You may save many a person's life!

Fast forward into trouble

Four years ago, Bhutan, the fabled Himalayan Shangri-la, became the last nation on earth to introduce television. Suddenly a culture, barely changed in centuries, was bombarded by 46 cable channels. And all too soon came Bhutan's first crime wave - murder, fraud, drug offences. Cathy Scott-Clark and Adrian Levy report from a country crash-landing in the 21st century

Saturday June 14, 2003
The Guardian

April 2002 was a turbulent month for the people of Bhutan. One of the remotest nations in the world, perched high in the snowlines of the Himalayas, suffered a crime wave. The 700,000 inhabitants of a kingdom that calls itself the Land of the Thunder Dragon had never experienced serious law-breaking before. Yet now there were reports from many towns and villages of fraud, violence and even murder.
The Bhutanese had always been proud of their incorruptible officials - until Parop Tshering, the 42-year-old chief accountant of the State Trading Corporation, was charged on April 5 with embezzling 4.5m ngultrums (£70,000). Every aspect of Bhutanese life is steeped in Himalayan Buddhism, and yet on April 13 the Royal Bhutan police began searching the provincial town of Mongar for thieves who had vandalised and robbed three of the country's most ancient stupas. Three days later in Thimphu, Bhutan's sedate capital, where overindulgence in rice wine had been the only social vice, Dorje, a 37-year-old truck driver, bludgeoned his wife to death after she discovered he was addicted to heroin. In Bhutan, family welfare has always come first; then, on April 28, Sonam, a 42-year-old farmer, drove his terrified in-laws off a cliff in a drunken rage, killing his niece and injuring his sister.

Why was this kingdom with its head in the clouds falling victim to the kind of crime associated with urban life in America and Europe? For the Bhutanese, the only explanation seemed to be five large satellite dishes, planted in a vegetable patch, ringed by sugar-pink cosmos flowers on the outskirts of Thimphu.
In June 1999, Bhutan became the last nation in the world to turn on television. The Dragon King had lifted a ban on the small screen as part of a radical plan to modernise his country, and those who could afford the £4-a-month subscription signed up in their thousands to a cable service that provided 46 channels of round-the-clock entertainment, much of it from Rupert Murdoch's Star TV network.

Four years on, those same subscribers are beginning to accuse television of smothering their unique culture, of promoting a world that is incompatible with their own, and of threatening to destroy an idyll where time has stood still for half a millennium. A refugee monk from Tibet, the Shabdrung, created this tiny country in 1616 as a bey-yul, or Buddhist sanctuary, a refuge from the ills of the world. So successful were he and his descendants at isolating themselves that by the 1930s virtually all that was known of Bhutan in the west was James Hilton's novel, Lost Horizon. He called it Shangri-la, a secret Himalayan valley, whose people never grew old and lived by principles laid down by their high lama: "Here we shall stay with our books and our music and our meditations, conserving the frail elegancies of a dying age."
In the real Bhutan, there were no public hospitals or schools until the 1950s, and no paper currency, roads or electricity until several years after that. Bhutan had no diplomatic relations with any other country until 1961, and the first invited western visitors came only in 1974, for the coronation of the current monarch: Dragon King Jigme Singye Wangchuck. Today, although a constant stream of people are moving to Thimphu - with their cars - there is still no word in dzongkha, the Bhutanese language, for traffic jam.

But none of these developments, it seems, has made such a fundamental impact on Bhutanese life as TV. Since the April 2002 crime wave, the national newspaper, Kuensel, has called for the censoring of television (some have even suggested that foreign broadcasters, such as Star TV, be banned altogether). An editorial warns: "We are seeing for the first time broken families, school dropouts and other negative youth crimes. We are beginning to see crime associated with drug users all over the world - shoplifting, burglary and violence."
Every week, the letters page carries columns of worried correspondence: "Dear Editor, TV is very bad for our country... it controls our minds... and makes [us] crazy. The enemy is right here with us in our own living room. People behave like the actors, and are now anxious, greedy and discontent."
But is television really destroying this last refuge for Himalayan Buddhism, the preserve of tens of thousands of ancient books and a lifestyle that China has already obliterated over the border in Tibet? Can TV reasonably be accused of weakening spiritual values, of inciting fraud and murder among a peaceable people? Or is Bhutan's new anti-TV lobby just a cover for those in fear of change?
Television always gets the blame in the west when society undergoes convulsions, and there are always those ready with a counter argument. In Bhutan, thanks to its political and geographic isolation, and the abruptness with which its people embraced those 46 cable channels, the issue should be more clearcut. And for those of us sitting on the couch in the west, how the kingdom is affected by TV may well help to find an answer to the question that has evaded us: have we become the product of what we watch?

The Bhutanese government itself says that it is too early to decide. Only Sangay Ngedup, minister for health and education, will concede that there is a gulf opening up between old Bhutan and the new: "Until recently, we shied away from killing insects, and yet now we Bhutanese are asked to watch people on TV blowing heads off with shotguns. Will we now be blowing each other's heads off?"
Arriving at dusk, we pass medieval fortresses and pressed-mud towers, their roofs carpeted with drying scarlet chillies. Faint beads of electric light outline sleepy Thimphu. Twisting lanes rise and fall along the hillside, all of them leading to the central clock tower, where the battered corpse of Tshering, a 50-year-old farmer, was found. In this Brueghel-like scene, crowded and shambolic, where the entire population shares fewer than two dozen names, TV is omnipresent. Potato stores sell flat-screen Trinitrons; old penitents whirl their prayer wheels outside the Sony service centre; inside every candle-lit shop-house a brand new screen flickers.

His Excellency Jigmi Thinley, Bhutan's foreign minister, greets us wrapped in an orange scarf, a foot-long silver sword hanging over his ceremonial robe, or gho. He sweeps us into a pillared hall embossed with golden dragons to explain why the king welcomed cable television to the Land of the Thunder Dragon. "We wanted a goal different from the material concept of maximising gross national product pursued by western governments," he says with a beatific smile. "His Majesty decided that, as a spiritual society, happiness was the most important thing for us - something that had never been discussed before as a policy goal or pronounced as the responsibility of the state." And so, in 1998, the Dragon King defined his nation's guiding principle as Gross National Happiness.
But happiness proved to be an elusive concept. The Bhutanese wondered whether it increased with a bigger house or the number of revolutions of a prayer wheel. A delegation from the foreign ministry was sent abroad to investigate whether happiness could be measured. They finally found a Dutch professor who had made its study his life's work and were disappointed to learn that his conclusion was that happiness equalled £6,400 a year - the minimum on which one could live comfortably. It was a bald and irrelevant answer for the Bhutanese middle classes, whose average annual salary was barely £1,000 and whose outlook was slightly more metaphysical.

The people of Bhutan, however, finally decided for themselves what would make them happy. France 1998 was driving the football-mad kingdom into a frenzy of goggle-eyed envy of those who were able to watch the World Cup on television. The small screen had always been prohibited in Bhutan, although the kingdom was crisscrossed by satellite signals that it was finding increasingly difficult to keep out. Even the king was rumoured to have a Star TV satellite package installed at his palace. Faced by recriminations, the government relented and Bhutan's Olympic Committee was permitted to erect a giant screen in Changlimithang stadium - but only temporarily. A TV screen in the middle of Thimphu was a revolutionary sight. The kingdom, for so long an autocracy, had only recently forged links with the outside world. In 1959, China quelled an uprising in Tibet, spilling war into the north of Bhutan, forcing the previous Dragon King to forge diplomatic ties for the first time in the country's history. "Even then," says the foreign minister, "we were determined not to become pawns on a chessboard and decided not to have formal relations with the superpowers. We also sensed the regret of many nations across the world at what they had lost in terms of values and culture."

The current Dragon King's father initiated a careful programme of modernisation that saw his people embrace the kind of material progress that most western countries take centuries to achieve: education, modern medicine, transportation, currency, electricity. However, mindful of those afraid that foreign influences could destroy Bhutanese culture, he attempted to inhibit conspicuous consumption. No Coca-Cola. No advertising hoardings. And definitely no television.
By France 1998, Bhutan had a new Dragon King and, under growing pressure from an unsettled country, he had a new political agenda. That year, King Jigme Singye Wangchuck announced he would give up his role as head of government and cede power to the national assembly. The people would be consulted about the drafting of a constitution. The process would complete Bhutan's transformation from monarchist Shangri-la into a modern democracy. And television would play its part. The prime minister of Bhutan, Kinzang Dorji, has invited us to tea and we sit with him beneath a large thangka painting of the Wheel of Life. "His Majesty wants the Bhutanese people to run their own country. But many are frightened of the responsibility. A lot of things have changed very quickly in Bhutan, and we do recognise that some people feel lost, at sea," the prime minister explains. "Watching news on the BBC and CNN enables them to see how democracies work in other parts of the world, how people can take charge of their own destinies. The old feudal ways have to end."

The year after France beat Brazil 3-0 in the World Cup final, the people of Thimphu gathered once again in Changlimithang stadium, this time to celebrate the Dragon King's silver jubilee. On June 2 1999, he stood before them to announce that now they could watch TV whenever they wanted. "But not everything you will see will be good," he warned. "It is my sincere hope that the introduction of television will be beneficial to our people and country." The prime minister insists that the introduction of television was carefully prepared: "To mitigate the impact of negative messages, we launched firstly the Bhutan Broadcasting Service [BBS] to provide a local educational and cultural service." Only after the BBS had found its voice would a limited number of foreign channels be permitted to beam programmes into Bhutan via local cable operators.

News footage from the first BBS broadcast of June 2 1999, records the cheer that resounded around Changlimithang. Bhutan's spiritual and cultural leaders were all agreed that TV could only increase the country's Gross National Happiness and help the people to pave the way to a modern, democratic nation. Mynak Tulku, the reincarnation of a powerful lama, is the Dragon King's unofficial ambassador for new technology. Light pouring in through the carved wooden windows catches his large protruding ears and bathes the monk in a golden glow. Nearby, in the main library, some of the oldest surviving texts in Tibetan Buddhism, dharmic verses penned in liquid gold, are being digitised. "I am so excited about technology," beams the Tulku, the epitome of the king's notion of Gross National Happiness. "And let me tell you that TV's OK, as long as you appreciate that it is a transitory experience. I tell my students that it's like rushing in from the cold, going straight to the heater and ending up with frostbite. Ha, ha. TV can make you think that you are being educated, when in fact all you're doing is blinking your life away with a remote control. Ha, ha."

The Bhutan Broadcasting Service was intended to be a bulwark against cable television. When we call by, it is clear the studio is still not finished: the team of technicians hired from Bollywood has gone home for Diwali. The state broadcaster has only one clip-on microphone, but the features producer cannot find it. There are a bundle of programmes "in the can", he says, but none is ready for broadcast. A list of feature ideas hangs on a board, each one eclipsed by a large question mark: Bhutanese MTV? Candid Camera? Pop Idol? Big Brother?
There is no one else on any of the three floors of the BBS building, but there is a distant clamour coming from outside. There, behind a garden shed, we eventually find the BBS cameramen and reporters dressed in their billowing ghos, throwing giant darts at a clay target. It is a badly needed team-building exercise, says Kinga Singye, the BBS executive director, with a doleful voice that makes him sound as if he has had enough of the royal experiment in television. He describes how, in 1999, the last people to learn of the lifting of the television ban were those then charged with setting up the new national station. "They were given three months to make it work. It was done with incredible haste - to be ready in time for the king's silver jubilee. What the government wanted was hugely ambitious and expensive, yet we didn't have experience and they had no funding to give," he says. Everyone was surprised when the ministers then issued licences to cable TV operators in August 1999, a bare three months after BBS went on air.

Three years later, in the absence of investment, BBS can still be transmitted only in Thimphu; tapes of its shows bound for the remote eastern town of Trashigang take three days to arrive, by bus and mule. "Our job was supposed to be to show people that not everything coming from outside is good," Kinga Singye says. "But we are now being drowned out by the foreign TV signals. People are continually disappointed in us." That evening, the nightly BBS News At Seven begins at 7.10pm. A documentary on a Bhutanese football prodigy is mysteriously canned halfway through. It is followed by some footage of an important government event, the Move For Health. The sound is indistinct, the picture faded, the message lost.
Downtown, at the southern end of Norzin Lam high street, a wriggling crowd of children press their faces to a shop window. Inside the headquarters of Sigma Cable, the walls are papered with an X-Files calendar and posters for an HBO show called Hollywood Beauties. Beneath a portrait of the Dragon King, the in-store TV shows wrestling before BeastMaster comes on. A man in tigerskin trunks has trained his marmosets to infiltrate the palace of a barbarian king. When the monarch is decapitated and gore slip-slaps across the screen, the children watching outside screech with glee. Inside the Sigma office, the staff are scrapping over the remote control, channel-hopping, mixing messages. President Bush in a 10-gallon hat welcomes Jiang Zemin to Texas. Midgets wrestle on Star World. Female skaters catfight on Rollerball.

Today, Sigma Cable, whose feed comes from five large satellite dishes at the edge of the city, is the most successful of more than 30 cable operators. Together, they supply virtually the entire country, ensuring that even the folks in remote Trashigang can sit down every night to watch Larry King Live.
Rinzy Dorje, Sigma's chief executive, wears a traditional gho but his mind is on fibreoptics and broadband. He was one of the first people in Bhutan to learn to program a computer, and back then (the 1980s) his machine came housed in a home-made wooden box. When he launched Sigma on September 10 1999, he captured the market in Thimphu, signing up the queen mother, the king and his four wives, among others. Between calls on his new mobile telephone, he defends cable TV: "Look, Bhutan couldn't hold back any longer - we can't pretend we're still a medieval, hermit nation. When the government finally got around to announcing cable TV, I was ready, that's all. All the information you need to know on cable technology is on the net. I got prices and sourced the parts in Delhi and Taiwan. And cable came to Bhutan. It's no big deal."

A disgruntled subscriber rings to complain that MTV has gone down. Are there are too many channels? "I couldn't cut back on the channels even if I wanted to - the customers would go elsewhere and Star TV wants us to show more channels, not fewer."
Have Bhutan's values been corroded by TV? "We are entitled to watch what we want, when we want, if we want. And we are quite capable of weeding out the rubbish; turning off the crap," he retorts.
However you look at it, it's obvious that the BBS has been charged down by the juggernaut of Star TV. "If the government wanted to control what people watched, they should have legislated, not tried to compete," says Rinzy Dorje.

It takes three days to pin down Leki Dorji, the deputy minister of communications, an overloaded crown appointee who is also responsible for roads, urban renewal, civil aviation and construction. He readily admits that, in its haste to introduce TV, the government failed to prepare legislation. There is no film classification board or TV watershed in force here, no regulations about media ownership. Companies such as Star TV are free to broadcast whatever they want. Only three years after the introduction of cable did the government announce that a media act would be drafted. Leki Dorji says his ministry is also planning an impact study, but adds that he does not believe cable television is responsible for April's crime wave. "Yes, we are seeing some different types of crime, but that just reflects the fact that our society is changing in many ways. A culture as rich and sophisticated as ours can survive trash on TV and people are quite capable of turning off the rubbish."
Whether the truck-driver Dorje was influenced by something he had watched on television when he began smoking heroin or when he clubbed his wife to death has yet to be established. We will not know whether the death of Sonam's niece had anything to do with the impatient, selfish society promoted by television until the impact study is completed. But there is a wealth of evidence that points to television having been a critical factor.

The marijuana that flourishes like a weed in every Bhutanese hedgerow was only ever used to feed pigs before the advent of TV, but police have arrested hundreds for smoking it in recent years. Six employees of the Bank of Bhutan have been sentenced for siphoning off 2.4m ngultrums (£40,000). Six weeks before we arrived, 18 people were jailed after a gang of drunken boys broke into houses to steal foreign currency and a 21-inch television set. During the holy Bishwa Karma Puja celebrations, a man was stabbed in the stomach in a fight over alcohol. A middle-class Thimphu boy is serving a sentence after putting on a bandanna and shooting up the ceiling of a local bar with his dad's new gun. Police can barely control the fights at the new hip-hop night on Saturdays.
While the government delays, an independent group of Bhutanese academics has carried out its own impact study and found that cable television has caused "dramatic changes" to society, being responsible for increasing crime, corruption, an uncontrolled desire for western products, and changing attitudes to love and relationships. Dorji Penjore, one of the researchers involved in the study, says: "Even my children are changing. They are fighting in the playground, imitating techniques they see on World Wrestling Federation. Some have already been injured, as they do not understand that what they see is not real. When I was growing up, WWF meant World Wide Fund for Nature."

Kinley Dorji, editor of Kuensel (motto: That The Nation Shall Be Informed), warns that Bhutan's ruling elite is out of touch. "We pride ourselves in being academic and sophisticated, but we are also a very naive kingdom that does not yet fully understand the outside world. The government underestimated how aggressively channels like Star market themselves, how little they seem to care about programming, how virulent the message of the advertisers is." Kinley Dorji, a member of the taskforce charged with drafting the kingdom's first media act, believes Bhutanese society is in danger of being polarised by TV. "My generation, the ministers, lamas and headteachers, have our grounding in old Bhutan and can apply ancient culture to this new phenomenon. But the ordinary people, the villagers, are confused about whether they should be ancient or modern, and the younger generation don't really care. They jettison traditional culture for whatever they are sold on TV. Go and see real Bhutan, see how the people are affected."
A fanfare of Tibetan trumpets booms through the pine forest. A rough choir of a thousand voices sings out: "Move for, move for health." It is so early in the morning that the birds are still asleep. But Sangay Ngedup, minister for health and education, has been on the path for hours. His gho is bunched beneath his backpack, and a badge with the king's smiling face is pinned on to his baseball hat. In the past 15 days, he has climbed and scrambled over some of the world's most extreme terrain, from sea level to a rarefied 13,500ft in the Bhutanese Himalayas. Is there anywhere else in the world where a cabinet minister would trek 560km to warn people against becoming a nation of couch potatoes? "We used to think nothing of walking three days to see our in-laws," he says. "Now we can't even be bothered to walk to the end of Norzin Lam high street."
He pauses at an impromptu feeding station, gulping down salt tea and buttered yak's cheese. "You can never predict the impact of things like TV or the urbanisation it brings with it," he says. "But you can prepare. If the BBS was intended as our answer to the cable world, I have to say that, at the moment, it is rather pathetic." Sangay Ngedup is one of the only government ministers willing to voice concerns about television.

For the first time, he says, children are confiding in their teachers of feeling manic, envious and stressed. Boys have been caught mugging for cash. A girl was discovered prostituting herself for pocket money in a hotel in the southern town of Phuents-holing. "We have had to send teachers to Canada to be trained as professional counsellors," says Sangay Ngedup. This march is not just against a sedentary lifestyle; it is a protest against the values of the cable channels. One child's placard proclaims, "Use dope, no hope." "Breast is best," a girl shouts. "Enjoy the gift of sex with condoms," reads a toddler's T-shirt.
The next day, as they do every day at Yangchenphug high school, teachers prepare their pupils for the nightly onslaught of foreign images on television. They pray to Jambayang, the Buddhist god of wisdom, a recent addition to the school timetable insisted upon by the clergy. A class of 15-year-olds are inquisitive and smart. How many of you have television, we ask. Laughter fills the room. "We all have TV, sir and madam," a girl at the front pipes up.
"What's your culture like?" they ask. "Do you have universities? Does it rain a lot where you come from?"

What do you like about TV, we ask the class. "Posh and Becks, Eminem, Linkin Park. We love The Rock," they chorus. "Aliens. Homer Simpson." No mention of BBS. No one saw its documentary on Buddhist festivals last night. Superficially, these pupils are as they would be in any school in the world, but this is a country that has reached modernity at such breakneck speed that the god of wisdom Jambayang is finding it virtually impossible to compete with the new icons.
A new section entitled "controversies" in the principal's annual report describes "marathon staff meetings that continue on a war footing to discuss student discipline, substance abuse, degradation of values in changing times". On another page is a short obituary for ninth-year pupil Sonam Yoezer, "battered to death by an adult in the town". Violence, greed, pride, jealousy, spite - some of the new subjects on the school curriculum, all of which teachers attribute to the world of television. In his airy study, the principal, Karma Yeshey, whose MA is from Leeds University but whose attitude is still otherworldly, pours Earl Grey tea. "Our children live in two different worlds, one created by the school and another by cable. Our challenge is to help them understand both, and we are terribly afraid of failing."

Outside Thimphu, the two worlds of Bhutan are already beginning to blur into one. In the heart of the kingdom's spiritual capital of Punakha stands the Palace of Great Happiness, where the Shabdrung, the country's founding father, is interred. Today a black wire crosses the drawbridge to the 17th-century fortress, running through a top-floor casement and taking cable television into the sacred shrine. So high is the demand for Oprah and Mutant X that in this town the size of London's Blackheath there are now two rival operators vying for business.
The children of Punakha are, by the dozen, abandoning their ghos for jeans and T-shirts bearing US wrestling logos; on their heads are Stars and Stripes bandannas. On the whitewashed mud wall of the ancient crematorium, they have scrawled in charcoal a message in English: "Fuck off Kinley and die."
How quickly their ancient culture is being supplanted by a mish-mash of alien ideas, while their parents loiter for hours at a time in the Welcome Guest House, farmers with their new socks embossed with Fila logos, all glued to David Beckham on Manchester United TV. A local official tells us that in one village so many farmers were watching television that an entire crop failed. It is not just a sedentary lifestyle this official is afraid of. Here, in the Welcome Guest House, farmers' wives ogle adverts for a Mercedes that would cost more than a lifetime's wages. Furniture "you've always desired", accessories "you have always wanted", shoes "you've always dreamed of" - the messages from cable's sponsors come every five minutes, and the audience watching them grows by the day.
There is something depressing about watching a society casting aside its unique character in favour of a Californian beach. Cable TV has created, with acute speed, a nation of hungry consumers from a kingdom that once acted collectively and spiritually.

Bhutan's isolation has made the impact of television all the clearer, even if the government chooses to ignore it. Consider the results of the unofficial impact study. One third of girls now want to look more American (whiter skin, blond hair). A similar proportion have new approaches to relationships (boyfriends not husbands, sex not marriage). More than 35% of parents prefer to watch TV than talk to their children. Almost 50% of the children watch for up to 12 hours a day. Is this how we came to live in our Big Brother society, mesmerised by the fate of minor celebrities fighting in the jungle?

Everyone is as yet too polite to say it, but, like all of us, the Dragon King underestimated the power of TV, perceiving it as a benign and controllable force, allowing it free rein, believing that his kingdom's culture was strong enough to resist its messages. But television is a portal, and in Bhutan it is systematically replacing one culture with another, skewing the notion of Gross National Happiness, persuading a nation of novice Buddhist consumers to become preoccupied with themselves, rather than searching for their self.

<...ends>

Copyright Guardian Newspapers, 2003.

Treasury's bail-out: The REAL reason for the desperate haste?

2008-09-25T11:33:00.000-07:00

.
They claim this dire urgency to reach an agreement at break-neck speed on seizing our money is necessary to bring some much-needed order and stability to their precious markets. As if $700bn would fix up THIS catastrophic mess! And what's all this about said agreement not being subsequently reviewable or reversible by ANY court of appeal no matter how high? Somewhat suspicious to say the least, wouldn't you say?

Let's think about it for a moment in the light of what we know about these crooked banksters. The degree of desperation demonstrated by Ben, Henry and others in their frantic pleas to Congress could more accurately be attributed to something else entirely and here Phaedrus sets out his suspicions as to a more probable ulterior motive behind the extraordinary haste. As usual, we'll do so by way of a short analogy. We like analogies here on World Peace. You may have noticed!

Imagine then, if you will, a beautiful, brim-full lake like - oh, I don't know - say Lake Michigan. All the time the water level is high, everything's real pretty, life is sweet and everyone's happy. A while later, however, imagine a structural fault in the lake bed developing which causes the water to gradually drain away. Slowly more and more of the shoreline dries up and extends as the water level continues to sink. More and more it resembles a fetid swap with an evil stench to match. Eventually, long hidden objects on the lake floor begin to become visible for the first time. The roofs of clapped-out old cars dumped years ago by owners who'd claimed they'd been stolen to get the insurance money are first to break the surface. More and more unsightly wreckage is gradually revealed by the subsiding waters until finally, the lake is nothing more than a bone-dry basin peppered with old jalopies, rusty bicycles, the skeletons of murder victims, and hastily concealed impliments of past crimes: knives, guns, iron bars and what-have-you.

Now Phaedrus proposes that this is the scenario these rogue financiers are so DESPERATE to prevent arising. They are seeking to use OUR money to ensure the 'lake of liquidity' is kept topped-up sufficiently to prevent the evidence of the extent of their craven thievery from coming to light. The proposed injection of yet more liquidity into the system (or 'lake basin' in this analogy)will - temporarily at any rate - cover up a considerable amount of highly embarrassing criminal evidence!

Every time throughout history that there's a been downturn in the economy - here or abroad - businesses that seemed fine in the good times but fail when things get tough often turn out to have been improperly run (that's a polite way of saying FRAUD is involved). Recessions not only cull inefficient businesses, they reveal the bent ones for what they are, too and the folks that run them typically wind up in jail. This scenario never fails to materialize during any period of economic difficulty you care to mention. Now here today, we are in a period of GRAVE economic difficulty where we can reasonably expect that the most prolific and deep-rooted crooks at the business end of the money trail will become progressively exposed as the pool of liquidity which previously concealed their duplicitous chicanery continues to dry-up. This, in Phaedrus's submission, is the REAL reason for the desperate clamor for yet another big shot of liquidity and nothing to do with market stability.

The only proper course of action therefore is NOT to replenish the 'lake' until the LEAK (Israel and the pockets of the Zionist banksters) has been stopped up, and every item of forensic evidence that's being exposed by this money drought has been collected, cataloged, thoroughly investigated, and the rogues responsible for this chronic, systemic fraud against our nation are exposed for the embezzlers they are are and dealt with in a manner commensurate with the magnitude of their vile and despicable crimes. It is vitally important, therefore, that Congress must not allow itself to be browbeaten and railroaded into letting these JERKS off the hook by acceding to their insistent calls for an irreversible agreement of such size with far-reaching implications in the space of a few short days. The American people will come to hate them for it if they fail us YET again and show no courage and guts in the face of these crooks' intimidation.

Who's up for a Tax Rebellion?

2008-09-22T11:19:00.000-07:00

Important proposal - please circulate widely!

Why shouldn't WE default, too! Anyone Care to Join Us?

Phaedrus and friends have decided to avail themselves of the increasingly-known fact that it's not compulsory to pay any tax on what you earn. If it's good enough for scheming Jews, it's good enough for us! We urge everyone else to do the same as a protest against the outrageous off-loading of Jewish bankers' massive debts onto ordinary folks like you and me. Back in about 1988, the infamous Jewish fraudstress, Leona Helmsley accurately observed: "Only the little people pay taxes" - before being sent to the slammer for 4 years for drawing attention to this embarrassing little loophole which enables 'those in the know' to put nothing back in the communal pot, yet have their asses supported by the gullible masses when things turn pear-shaped – as they now have, in case you hadn't noticed.

In fact, even if the law is changed in response to a mass tax-revolt, this blogger for one won't be paying a single penny to the US Treasury, even if it costs me a year of my liberty cooped up with a Negro in some shitty prison cell. It might even be a great opportunity to evangelize to the vast Negro prison population and set the record straight about who has REALLY exploited and oppressed them for the last 400 years: the Jews. Now back to the point: this is my vow to the blogosphere: I shall not be paying ONE THIN DIME in income tax for the foreseeable future, as the only meaningful form of peaceful protest against this criminal transfer of money from the innocent middle classes to the cravenly greedy super-rich. Fuck the lot of them to hell and back! Now try making a "write-down" out of that!!

Note: nothing very Revolutionary here being proposed. It's simply a call for some Thoreau-inspired Civil Disobedience on country-wide scale to show the suckers in Washington that they can't just do what the hell they please and that there ARE, AND HAVE TO BE LIMITS to the blatant robbery now being attempted against the people that build this country up, for the benefit of those hell-bent on tearing it down. Withholding our taxes in the face of this criminal enterprise of theirs is the VERY LEAST a patriotic American can do. If you can't even be bothered to do THAT - then we really are FINISHED FOR GOOD.

Random Thoughts #3: Condoleeza Rice

2008-09-22T11:12:00.000-07:00

.
What is this butt-ugly Negress actually GOOD for? She never achieves anything other than massively aggravating the air pollution problem through her never-ending flights to every basket-case country you can name in the pursuit of Israel's aims. Perhaps we should bite the bullet and admit that though black males are useless at anything other than raping and murdering white women, black WOMEN are even WORSE than useless and should never be allowed anywhere remotely near a discussion table! I'll wager she has to be spoon-fed every little policy detail over and over again until they're happy to let the bitch get aboard a plane to deliver (parrot-fashion) the well-rehearsed message. It must be costing us all a fortune!
.

Random Thoughts #2: George Michael

2008-09-22T11:05:00.000-07:00

.
Phaedrus has nothing personal against queers that keep themselves to themselves. Being a freedom-lover at heart, this blogger believes that what goes on IN PRIVATE between consenting perverts should be their own goddamn business. However, when you get said queers openly manifesting their revolting proclivities in public toilets and inflicting their sickness on the general population, then the gloves are off and it's a whole different ball game.(no pun intended)

Michael himself has NO excuse. He has more than enough money to hire some actively WILLING professional pervert to indulge him in his dirty desires. There's no need for him with his undeniable wealth to go around stinking up a respectable neighborhood like Hampstead Heath in London inflicting his revolting and abhorrent lifestyle on decent and principled men and children.

George Michael and his like hanging around public toilets with hard drugs (or without, for that matter) attempting to draw innocent children into a lifetime of debauchery and dependency on illegal substances through sordid sex acts with middle-aged dung-beetles should be dealt with in a fitting manner. They should enjoy NO legal protection whatsoever from understandably outraged parents meting out summary justice at the point of a shotgun if necessary.

It's horrible to have to be judgmental (Phaedrus shrinks from finger-pointing as regular readers will know) but what is Michael's defense here? How could anyone other than a libertine with the values of a Jew attempt to justify such vile behavior? It's sick, sick, sick and Michael should be locked up in a mental hospital for a good dose of forced treatment over many months; not to be released again until he's no longer a menace to young boys.

Random Thoughts #1: Thabo Mbeki's Resignation

2008-09-22T11:02:00.000-07:00

.
This latest useless, corrupt African waster - sorry, "Elder, Dignified Statesman" - has been forced to resign from the presidency of the once-great country of South Africa. "Once-great", because it WAS, until the Negroes took over the running of it back in 1990. Since then it's been downhill, downhill, downhill. The fact is that the only time that southern Africa has been successful was when it was run by WHITE europeans. Nelson Mandela made a semi-credible job as a black president for the first 8 years or so of black rule, in not doing too much damage to the country he inherited (even though crime predictably rose massively) but it was only a matter of time before Afrocosis set in, as it invariably does, when blacks attempt to run ANYTHING.

Mbeki's departure is likely to result in the eventual assumption of power by one Jacob Zuma, whose catchy election theme song is entitled: "Pass Me My Machine Gun!" - which gives us some frightening insight into the country's future direction. What a terrible, terrible prospect for the decent, hard-working white folks who made the country into Africa's bread basket and the most prosperous country on the dark continent. What then, can South Africa's whites look forward to under Zuma's leadership? Just take a look at Zimbabwe after 28 years of black rule and that should answer any outstanding questions we have. Furthermore, let's not forget that when Zuma was South Africa's 'health minister' he thought taking a shower after having sex with a woman with AIDS would prevent him becoming infected! Enough said, huh?

Beneath all Contempt

2008-09-22T10:57:00.000-07:00

.
Just the one question...

To which group of people have the following stinging epithets most commonly been applied:-

"Vampires,
vultures,
locusts,
rats,
rodents,
vermin,
scavengers,
liars,
fraudsters,
shysters,
blood-suckers,
leeches,
cockroaches?"

Please choose one of the following:-

a) Gypsies
b) Homosexuals
c) Lesbians
d) Jews
e) White folks
f) Negroes
g) Nips
h) Chinks
i) Eskimos
j) Druggies
k) Communists
l) Pan-handlers
m) the Mafia

Correct! Even though you only had a one in 13 chance of being right, you were! And you don't even need your correct answer confirmed!

The Treasury's latest scam to mug us is nothing new..

2008-09-20T12:32:00.000-07:00

.
If you've read the previous posting by Phaedrus below, you will probably - as a decent, hard-working, human being - not be acquainted with the fact that the government's purchase of irredeemable debt at OUR expense is in reality just a variation of an old fraud that was hugely popular for a while during the 1970s.

The scam worked like this...

It required someone placed in what is known in financial circles as the "back office" - these are the clerks that don't do any deals themselves, but keep the books in order and simply ship the securities for those that DO – the Big, Swinging Dicks who constitute the highly-paid hot-shots of the "front office" - the guys with two phones in each ear; a plethora of screens before them and the obligatory Ferrari parked out front.

The scam as it was then is no longer operable in quite the same form today. It was eventually rumbled, and stricter procedures were introduced to ensure it couldn't be worked again - not at employee level, anyway. The only victims of it, by the way, at THAT time, were the stockholders of the individual banks and investment brokerages directly concerned. It had no 'macro-adverse-effects' on the broader economy - nor even the banking sector.

In those far off days, it was permissible for a trader to execute different trades both for himself (as a perk of his job) AND (separately) for his employer, by maintaining two entirely SEPARATE account record books. The trader would enter his own, personal dealings records in one book, and his employer's (the bank's) dealings in another book solely for that purpose. In this way, the trader could follow his hunches and take positions with his OWN money along side of dealing for his firm with their money on their behalf.

Such was the dealing-room scene in those distant days. TRUST was granted without question as a matter of course (and had been for centuries). On the dealing floor of the London Stock Exchange, for example, they had a time-honored Latin maxim for it: "dictum meum pactum meum" - "my word is my bond" - and the whole show was operated around (and depended upon) a man's integrity and honesty to stick by every deal he made and never fail to deliver on time the purchase monies or the stock as appropriate. To accuse a dealer of wrongdoing or bad faith was an unforgivable slight on his character, if such could not be quickly proven beyond doubt.

This paper-based system was open to exploitation, not surprisingly, by the dishonest. These a-moral con-artists would keep the two sets of books as required, but neglect to fill in certain particulars at the time the deal was done – most importantly the contract dates - until AFTER it became clear whether the deal in question had turned a profit or not. Back then, unscrupulous traders had SEVERAL WEEKS in which to complete their books. If their deals came good, there was the temptation to accredit the bargain to the trader's PERSONAL account. On the other hand, if the deal turned out badly, the dealer could escape personal losses by marking the bad deal down to the bank's own account book. No supervisor ever made a day-by-day audit to check!

Young dealers today would marvel at the opportunities to make illicit profits if they knew how loosely things were run in the old days when TRUST was implicit and regulation and oversight virtually non-existent, nor even necessary when a man's word alone was so completely trusted.

So this classic malpractice has today become the model by which the plutocratic Jewish financiers (who discovered its weakness and ruthlessly exploited it) have shafted us into buying garbage 'assets.' The original scam is the inspiration and basic methodology behind what is being done to us right now. You are probably already seeing the light, but let me spell it out, anyway: the old scam has broadened: the individual rogue trader has become the bank or investment brokerage itself. The individual commercial bank has become the conglomerate, corrupt merchant bank, and the (collective bank) losses are now having to be borne by the taxpayer thanks to the illegal actions of a traitorous government which pathetically cries out, "it's the only way to stave off global economic collapse!"

In short, it is nothing new. The only difference is in its SCALE. This is the essence of Corporate Communism: it heaps financial losses onto the masses whilst keeping any gains for itself. We the People are the ultimate 'lender of last resort' through our tax contributions, NOT the Fed. There really is virtually no difference between the two forms of this old CON beyond the sheer SCALE it is now being worked. And as any reasoning person will surely accept, unchallenged thieves will only grow more emboldened until they finally wind up hanging themselves through their own naked greed and the inability to know when they have pushed people that bit too far. Jews have abused the trust that gentiles unwisely granted them when they began dealing with these vermin in the mid 1600s.
The question is, when are these blatant thefts from his pocket going to hurt Joe Public sufficiently to sting him into action? How much more can the Jews feasibly get away with??

The Corporate Communists buy themselves more time - with OUR money!

2008-09-19T03:15:00.000-07:00

.
Everyone should be familiar with the ethos behind today's Corporate Communism by now: everybody's equal, except that SOME are rather more equal than others. "Those who are equal" means the residents of main street; those that are MORE equal, on the other hand, are the Wall Street Players. Deals that go well and turn a profit are booked down privately to the Players' account; deals that go sour and lose money are booked down to the taxpayers' and heaped onto the National Debt. The Fed can always print more dollars and boy, aren't they always doing so!

So it was confirmed in Nancy Pelosi's proud announcement yesterday that the Zionist money men from the Fed and the upper strata of the 'Financial Community' had reached a consensus approach that will "insulate Wall street from main street." - and so it is - but NOT in the way we would justifiably expect! The average Joe would take this phrase to mean that main street was going to be shielded from Wall Street's self-inflicted idiocy and ordinary folks would therefore be spared from their greed and largess. This technique of the 'implied statement' is one of our politician's most recent inventions. Bush himself uses it frequently, so always read between these phony lines!

Unfortunately for us, it REALLY works the OTHER way around. Want proof? Just see how the markets have joyously reacted in the space of just 12hrs. The champaign corks have really been popping in trading rooms on both sides of the Atlantic! Pelosi was right: Wall street's losses have successfully been shifted once again onto the taxpayers and their children for generations to come, freeing the Players to get back to making profits for the plutocrats once more whist the rest of us Plebs pick up the ever-lengthening tab for their limitless greed and kleptomania.

Phaedrus suggests they enjoy the fruits of their latest THEFT whilst they can, for they are only in reality buying time. The eventual crash isn't going away; not a chance. Even if the great American public remains too lazy and ignorant to do anything right now over this latest outrageous RIP-OFF, they won't have any choice but to finally get up off their butts in due course when the derivatives market collapses taking EVERYTHING else with it. So let the fraudsters, shysters, counterfeiters and their cronies enjoy their respite while they can, for it simply ain't gonna last...!

Can you spot the odd one out?

2008-09-13T07:45:00.000-07:00

Difficult, isn't it? The reason for this difficulty is that no character really stands out here, for the simple reason that they're ALL odd! This photo comes from the long-running New World Order children's TeeVee show: 'Sesame Street' and when the format was originally conceived almost 40 years ago, this is the manner in which its Jewish designers envisaged how a future pluralistic, multicultural, utopia might appeal to the minds of children. Note that no two characters are the same; everyone's kinda different – 'diverse' you might even say - and consequently there's no conformity within this creepy little microsociety.

Nevertheless, there is ONE character that's different for a very good reason and we shall see which it is as we strip away the distractions provided by all those colorful weirdos that make him that much harder to spot.

For example, check out this next shot. And the one under that, too.

Can you NOW see who the odd one out is? You SHOULD be able to now, because said character (known as 'Count Von Count' from the series) has been stripped away from his colorful companions and is now juxtaposed between members of respectable, homogenous groupings. He thus becomes far more readily identifiable by virtue of being totally out-of-place. His individuality is now exposed by virtue of everyone else's respectable conformity. Those of us who are familiar with Sesame Street will know that the arithmetically-inclined 'Count' is the mathematician of this long-running series, who loves to show the children basic number theory. In fact it is reckoned that the inspiration behind the Count Von Count character was a real Jew called Leon Druckmann who died in the mid 1950s in New York with a fortune in gold coins under his bed, whilst insisting to his neighbors and everyone that knew him that he hadn't a single penny piece to his name in whole world.

So what are we to infer from this little glimpse into the world of children's TeeVee? The most obvious lesson here to be learned is that - quite apart from any other reasons (of which there are many) - Jews seek to set about promoting multicultural societies where people are encouraged to dress and adorn themselves absurdly and buy into bodily self-mutilation in the form of piercings and hideous tattoos, so as to form a loud and chaotic backdrop behind which the Jew is less readily identifiable. Thus sheltered, he may go about his dubious dealings without attracting unwanted attention from those who might otherwise discover him and out him for what he is. It is simply SO much nicer for the International Jew to be able to stalk the planet and feel at home anyplace his ideas have been adopted, rather than to wind up in a monocultural country like Norway for example, where all the residents are normal, fully-functional, healthy and decent. That must be the worst nightmare for any member of the Stateless Tribe to encounter, when hoping to find acceptance in yet another country.

Will our taxes replenish the coffers of Lehman Brothers?

2008-09-13T07:35:00.000-07:00

Phaedrus is well aware that there are discussions (supposedly) taking place right now between Lehmans and a consortium led by Bank of America, to try to salvage this, the fourth largest Jewish investment bank in the US from the all-out collapse it so richly deserves.

However, the fact remains that should such a private buyout rescue deal fail, then once again (illegally) the Government may wind up shelling out our hard-earned tax-dollars to prop up this miserable, monolithic monument to craven greed and stupidity, when the average American home-owner enjoys no such safety net. Curious, isn't it? Typically, in a normal country with some degree of social insurance, it is the poorest and most at risk that enjoy such protection. Only in the USA can it apply the other way around and provide a safety net for the super-rich. How utterly perverse!

This is, as regular readers who have informed themselves will know, unmistakably indicative of Jews calling the shots over the wishes of hard-pressed American people. The "Entitled Ones" whose Holy Book tells them that WE (you and me) are only put here as beasts of burden for their exploitation; we have no property rights and must render up to the Jews everything we own when called upon to do so. That is their Talmudic belief and we have to suffer lawmakers on Capitol Hill who appear perfectly happy to go along with this twisted belief system, too.

So if the current rescue talks fail and Bush says, "Lehman Brothers is just too big to be allowed to fail; we gotta support it." then you will know that YOU are going to foot the bill for it. Not only YOU, but since we're already in debt up to our eyeballs, your children, your children's children, and your children's children's children! America's Jews have got everything sown up REAL tight! They certainly ARE enslaving us all, just as their so-called Holy Book predicted.

The Jews' Beast of Burden - Us!

2008-09-11T06:04:00.000-07:00

Confident we’re at the top of the food chain? Think again…

Mankind has, throughout all recorded history, unquestionably been regarded as the dominant species on this planet. That said, however, on a one-to-one basis, we’d be eaten alive by African big game or sharks and whatnot, but since we’re smarter than they are, we could, if we had sufficient Will, wipe them out (and of course in certain cases we have actually done so without even meaning to).

But it is worth noting that we’re not as invincible as we think we are.
It is estimated, for example, that the mosquito has killed more people than any other disease-carrying insect and more people than in both World Wars. This tiny creature only seeks a negligible speck of blood from us, which we can easily spare, and intends us no harm. It is not the mosquito’s fault that it can carry yellow fever and malaria.

In the world of medicine, it is a remarkable fact that today, leaches are still utilized by doctors to treat certain illnesses. The leach takes rather more than the mosquito from us, but still not enough that we’d notice, unless they are applied en masse by the doctors who treat us, whereby sufficient quantities of fluid can indeed be drained to make a noticeable difference.

Bacteria live within us – both good and bad forms – and some strains can kill us. The biologically more developed strains, however, will only kill us after we’ve carried them onward to further hosts. Evolution has selected within them the ability to APPEAR to ‘think ahead.’ In this way they’re more successful than more primitive forms that ‘can’t wait’ to kill us off and as a result, die along with us.

The study of parasites is at once an utterly fascinating yet an utterly horrifying one. There is, for example, a species of fly in south America that can sting a person painlessly and yet 6 weeks later, after the resulting bump has swelled and been lanced, a sizable maggot can be withdrawn from the host victim.

In all these cases, however, we are aware of the risks. We know certain insects are dangerous and we can take precautions to protect ourselves when we go to areas that such insects inhabit. Likewise with dangerous mammals and sea creatures. We know the risks and we can protect ourselves and if we fail to and get killed as a result, then it’s our own fault; it’s simply Darwinism in action. Simple, huh? Unfortunately, however, it isn’t that simple at all.

Imagine the typical farmyard. The animals go about their daily business of being born, eating, breeding and being killed. In between these activities, they may also, depending upon their species, be milked, or shawn of wool, or lay eggs – whatever, it’s not important. The farmer has any number of ways of making his farm productive. But they all involve exploiting the animals in one way or another. But that’s okay, because the law allows it. Not only that, but even the Bible allows it, too. The Bible gives Mankind dominion over the animals to use them in any which way we please.

Now imagine for a moment, that WE are the animals in a broader farmyard going about our daily business, blissfully unaware that we were only there, being fed and watered in a seemingly benign environment, to be milked, shawn, skinned or any other which way exploited, and then finally slaughtered. That wouldn’t be acceptable, would it?
We’re better than animals, aren’t we? Well hopefully most of us are.

But there are a race of people on this planet of ours that believe that we are all – yes, ALL – only animals ourselves and here solely for their benefit; to be their slaves no less. These people have already been working their plans against us for centuries, in fact. The severely screwed-up world we see around us is in large measure the way it is because of their twisted vision of how things ought to be, which has shaped it accordingly.
These people, gentle reader, are the Jews and they have changed not one iota in their hatred for us since way before they arranged Christ’s execution 2,000 years ago. This attitude of theirs is in their blood; their very DNA and cannot therefore be reformed. History has proved this too many times.

These fully-referenced quotes from the Jews’ Holy book, the Talmud illustrate their contemptuous attitude toward everyone else:

“The Non-Jews have been created to serve the Jews as slaves.” - (Midrasch Talpioth 225)

“Just the Jews are humans, the Non-Jews are no humans, but cattle.” (goyim – human cattle) – (Kerithuth 6b page 78, Jebhammoth 61a)

“As you replace lost cows and donkeys, so you shall replace dead Non-Jews.” – (Iore Dea 337,1)

If they didn’t have any power or influence, of course, these horrible beliefs wouldn’t matter. Plenty of religions have crazy belief systems, yet they don’t impinge on our way of life. With the Jew, however, they very much do.

Jews control 96% of the Western world’s media. They dominate cinema, TV, radio, newspapers and magazines. Virtually all our sources of information that determine how we form our view of the world are shaped and filtered by Jews.

The areas of finance, banking, politics, the judiciary and industry are likewise similarly infested with Jews. Granted not all Jews take advantage of the superior rights supposedly granted them under Mosaic law, but even if only 10% of them do, then can we really afford to take the risk of letting such people run the planet? For that is what they are in reality doing and have been, for a very long time.

The Jew is the world’s only Super Parasite. Many of us can live whole lifetimes without ever becoming aware that we’ve been victims of Judaism. When we take home barely enough money to live on; when we get robbed, raped, assaulted or murdered, few of us ever realize that the Jew was in some way responsible. It all seems too far fetched, doesn’t it? But it is the TRUTH, nevertheless.

Phaedrus is absolutely implacably opposed to affording these people any influence whatsoever in the running of our Western countries. They are Asiatics. They do not belong in the West. To kick them out of their positions in the media, the judiciary and the government is to make a far better, more peaceful and very much less screwed-up world for the rest of us. Such a world is long, long, long overdue.

A Message for Israel (timely re-post)

2008-09-11T05:59:00.000-07:00

.
To the Scum in Tel Aviv and Washington DC:

Don’t you DARE try to drag us into yet another war in the Middle East. Are you murderous bastards never satisfied? Americans are at heart a decent, peace-loving people who don't share your insatiable thirst for blood. But for your endless interference and meddling in our foreign policy, we would not have now become the world's most hated country. We'd be better off by thousands of lives and hundreds of billions of dollars. Fight these enemies of yours on your own. YOU made enemies of them, so don't DARE expect us to pitch in every time and save your worthless hides. The lives of all the children in Israel aren’t worth one American fingernail. We pay you bastards $4bn a year to prop up your rotten, bloody, criminal pseudo-state and yet you're still not satisfied. You have put to slaughter the cream of American youth in fighting your phony, artificially-created and totally unnecessary wars.

Wars without end is the way of the Jew, NOT the way of the Gentile.
FIGHT YOUR OWN GODDAMN BATTLES YOU COWARDLY, GUTLESS PARASITES.

Have YOU been a victim of the Jews?

2008-09-11T05:55:00.000-07:00

.
When we speak about someone being a 'victim of the Jews' we typically envisage someone who's been ripped off in some massive investment fraud, or been swindled out of their inheritance by some crooked Jewish law firm. That is our instinctive expectation. And of course in very many instances, it proves to be correct. However, in our jumping to this conclusion and in not looking beyond it, we are in fact crediting the Jews with being far less of a menace than they really are. The reason for this is that the machinations of world Jewry are very much more extensive, corrosive and pernicious than mere financial crime alone can ever be. Most often, we completely fail to see the bigger picture...

If we do our level best to raise our kids right, yet despite our best efforts they slip into bad company and wind up on drugs and maybe ultimately in jail, it would never cross our minds that this is anything other than our own family's fault. Responsible parents invariably ask themselves, "Where did we go wrong?" and and are usually completely unable to identify any causal factor for such a dramatic and catastrophic personal failure. However, surely it must be in SOME way OUR fault, mustn't it?

Similarly, we may work hard for the same corporation for 30 years; said corporation enjoys strong sales and a good measure of profitability, yet one day, out of the blue, we find the plant is closing and we're all out of work because we're told we can't compete with factories in the far east where labor costs are far lower. But this isn't OUR fault; it's a 'failure of the market' or 'economic realities coming home' or whatever. What can you do?

One of your neighbors tells you that their 15 year-old daughter is close to death in hospital. She has suffered with anorexia for the past 3 years and is now refusing to eat altogether. Though at age 12 she was perfectly healthy and beautiful, she became convinced that she was fat and ugly and began to hate herself and her self-image. Nothing anyone could say could ever convince her otherwise. She had compared herself to 'ideal' images of female beauty as portrayed in teenage magazines and became deeply depressed and unresponsive to any rational argument. She is now down to just 60lbs and has perhaps only a few days to live.

You reside in a nice, peaceful, settled neighborhood where everyone knows everyone else and crime is virtually nil. Then over a relatively short period of perhaps less than 10 years, demographic shifts and changes in local government housing policy result in a substantial influx of immigrants or other outsiders who maybe don't share your existing view of community values. Crime rises, the jobs move away, drugs and gangs appear on the streets... You know it's the fault of these newcomers because everything was fine before they arrived, yet you're too afraid to speak out for fear of being branded a "racist." Your hands are therefore tied and all you can do is watch your once lovely hometown's long and painful decline.

Another example: no matter how diligently we raise our kids, no matter how much we teach them right from wrong and try to keep them on the straight and narrow and to uphold decent moral values, it doesn't prevent them from falling victim to someone ELSE'S kids who haven't been so scrupulously brought up by THEIR parents. Our sons may become victims of a violent attack/stabbing/shooting/whatever from some black thug with no father and a crack addict for a mother. Our daughters may in their turn wind up getting raped and murdered by some Negro who's spent the better part of his life in jail. In this case, it's the fault of the society in which we live today. So again, what can you do?

You may be a first class wife and mother, you believe everything's going swimmingly and your family life is a rock-solid cake-walk, when one day your husband, completely out of nowhere, says he's found someone else and is going to dump you and the kids flat cold. It's no failure of yours, is it? Whose fault is it, then? It's got to be just the way things are today. People don't take their responsibilities as seriously as they did back in the old days. Yeah, that's it: people just don't make the effort they once did to work at a relationship to ensure its success.

One could go on and on for paragraph after paragraph with innumerable other examples of how Bad Stuff happens and 'it's just the way it goes today and what can you do?'

Phaedrus believes that in all the above scenarios and in countless others that will doubtless spring to the reader's mind, it is not only POSSIBLE that there could ultimately be more to it than meets the eye, but there most assuredly IS. And that something, dear reader, arises out of the implementation of the Jewish Agenda, which is being vigorously pursued throughout the West as never before.

Raising a family successfully today is a really tough job. And families are the fundamental core units of society. Families need SUPPORT and PROTECTION for a healthy society to flourish. Broken homes equals broken society. The last thing families need is to be constantly under attack as they have been in recent years by the predations of the Jewish media in all its poisonous forms which seeks to foster in our minds a strong sense of dissatisfaction and disaffection with every decent, sterling value upon which this once-great nation was founded.

Regular readers of this blog will therefore not be surprised at Phaedrus' proposed remedy: it is more vital today than at any time in our history for us to seize back control of our country from the claws of the Jews by totally excluding them FOR ALL TIME from ANY involvement (directly or indirectly) in the media, the judiciary, politics and the legislature. If you remember nothing else from reading this item, I beg you, I IMPLORE YOU in fact, to remember just this last paragraph.

These Evil Madmen MUST be removed before they start YET ANOTHER Major War

2008-09-07T13:04:00.000-07:00

.
We refer here, of course, to George W. Bush and Dick Cheney - their immediate removal from office being of the UTMOST urgency. They SHOULD have been impeached as soon as their complicity in the attacks of 9/11 became apparent. How can such committed, psychopathic enemies of the American People be permitted to remain at the helm of this formerly great nation - which yet remains nuked-up to the eyeballs - whilst they contrive ever more odious mayhem against blameless innocents at home and abroad? We simply cannot stand idly by and watch them pointedly and repeatedly provoke Russia (with potentially deadly consequences for us all) over that two-bit, Jew-infested pseudo-entity in the Middle East, "Israel" - for that is ultimately what this gunboat diplomacy off the Black Sea coast is all about.

Bush and Cheney have contrived one pointless, futile and costly conflict after another since getting their treasonous butts ensconced in the White House 8 years ago. The damage they have done abroad and at home has been incalculable, and brought the American people NO BENEFIT WHATSOEVER. Everything is being orchestrated by and for the benefit of the parasite 'state' of Israel - our 'special ally' in the region. Some "ally" this is, which has over many decades bent over backwards to drag America into any and every strategic conflict that might benefit them (the Jews) and their business interests which are heavily invested in armaments and munitions and need a constant supply of cannon fodder American youth to generate a lucrative return for those evil entities who profit from the squandered blood of others.

It's high time our military personnel AT ALL LEVELS educated themselves about foreign policy and exactly what drives it. It's high time these soldiers from the lowest ranks to the highest, made a serious effort to do some research for themselves to establish the TRUTH about this unending slaughter and how they, the best of our young people, are exploited with callous, utter ruthlessness for the sake of mollifying the insatiable hunger for power and money that these vile parasites can evidently never get enough of. Bush and Cheney MANUFACTURE conflicts wherever and whenever they please for their own personal gain and the enrichment of their Jewish cronies - and our soldiers have to pay for this endless greed with their very blood. Isn't it time the armed services woke up to the manner in which they're being duped into believing they're fulfilling some 'patriotic duty' - and have been ever since the Jews slimed their way into the US government?

Phaedrus appeals to everyone and anyone who may come across this item in whatever form it may be found after this initial publication, to do everything in their power to ensure that this message and others like it get read by the brave young men and women under arms who have NO IDEA that they are being ruthlessly exploited by FOREIGN agents with FOREIGN interests who have NO thought whatsoever for the suffering they are causing to innocent people both at home and abroad. Israel is NOT our ally - it is and always has been our WORST ENEMY OF ALL TIME. The Jews have practiced their deceit against the American people now for generations and all we have to show for it is hundreds of thousands of graves and a bankrupt economy where criminal immigrants enjoy more rights and freedoms under the law than the rest of us put together.

The time is fast approaching when elements of the armed forces of the US are going to have to decide where their loyalties truly lie: with their OWN people and the Constitution they have sworn to defend (against enemies both foreign AND DOMESTIC) - or else the Jewish/Internationalist cabal currently fronted by a sicko president and his unaccountably taciturn side-kick. So come on, guys and girls in uniform; privates, sergeants, colonels and generals: where does YOUR loyalty lie and when you have made up your minds, WHEN are you going to ACT to remove these grubby, sordid TRAITORS from their long-enjoyed positions of disastrously-misplaced public trust??

An Apology to Curt Maynard!

2008-09-07T13:02:00.000-07:00

.
Phaedrus herewith apologizes unreservedly to Curt Maynard for unwittingly re-publishing his outstanding essay on "multiculturalism" (yet ANOTHER Jewish 'ism' we've been afflicted with) under "author unknown." Yes, Curt, I have since realized it is your very own elegant handiwork and in fact it had already been republished here on WP (under your name) only recently! In my defense I have to say I came across it on a moderated Usenet political discussion forum where it had been posted in full, yet unattributed and your usual style was not instantly recognizable from it. However, it does prove what I observed in my (most recent) tribute to you (after you were banned from Joogle YET AGAIN) that your work continues to proliferate anywhere and everywhere in cyberspace regardless of any further effort from you! I had TRIED to clarify matters within hours of the re-publication but it seems the J*** were not keen to allow me to do so and have been interfering with my access to WP now for the better part of a week (as they are also doing with Jeff Rense's site, as I understand it.) We must really be stepping on some highly sensitive toes! BTW, GREAT to see you up and running so soon after declaring your temporary moratorium. I hope you enjoyed your remarkably brief 'break' bonding with your family and look forward to many more of your great, insightful articles in the weeks and months to come!

A Word to the Wise...

2008-09-07T13:00:00.000-07:00

.
These comments are addressed primarily to Curt and Apollonian.

It cannot have escaped even the most unastute of reader's notice that the two of you have fallen out big time. This is sad and regrettable. When folks who are batting for the same team fall out publicly and resort to viscerally ill-willed name-calling, it only ever benefits our common enemy and does nothing but harm to our cause. This blog was set up in response to Frank Weltner's inspiring 'call to arms' on Jew Watch in which he was at pains to insist that we all act in a PROFESSIONAL manner. The kind of insults that are currently being traded are grist to the Jewish mill; a gift to those who have advanced their interests, and continue to do so, by means of their primordial, instinctive doctrine of divide and rule. It's a lesson for us all in how NOT to behave. I have been forced to watch passively while this sorry episode unravels before my eyes with horror and disbelief. Gentlemen, in the interests of our noble, vital and common cause, (pretty-please-with-sugar-on-it) KINDLY DESIST.

How does giving $1bn to Georgia's Jews benefit the average American??

2008-09-07T12:56:00.000-07:00

.
The US is falling to pieces at home; people being robbed of their houses by Jewish-owned banks in a contrived economic collapse, and ever more hard working folks being thrown out of work as a result. What's Cheney's response? Export a billion dollars to the Jews of Georgia, just to piss off Russia! What the HELL use is a 'government' like this to the average, decent American? How much longer are we expected to sit idly by whilst these huge frauds - 'high crimes' - are perpetuated against us, progressively bringing the country to ruin?

The Abject Failure of "Multiculturalism"

2008-09-02T05:08:00.000-07:00

.

This excellent piece on how Jewish contrived ideologies have CONTINUALLY screwed us in the West was discovered by Phaedrus on a trawl of the net earlier today. Author unknown.

Begins....

I recently came across a college students essay on the Internet and it's entitled "Multiculturalism: The Subdividing of History." Originally written in 1991 the essay affords us an opportunity to look back at how this process developed over time.

The author, Julie Ann Kessler, then a senior at Ashland College, a mid sized teaching institution in Ohio, presents her thesis in a typically dry and academic format, but manages to immediately highlight a curious fact about "multiculturalism," something that was much easier to recognize and admit to fourteen years ago than it is today.

Today many of us are under the erroneous impression that "multiculturalism," was designed to encourage tolerance by bringing together members of our society through the celebration of diversity in fact the entire "multicultural movement," has been divisive from the beginning
Ms. Kessler acknowledges this fact in her first paragraph:

No debate within higher education is more divisive than the one being waged between self-proclaimed "multiculturalists" and those who could be called traditionalists in the study of Western culture.

You'll hear many people exclaim today that Jews were the initiators of this divisive agenda, and then you'll immediately hear these people referred to as anti-Semites for daring to suggest such a ridiculous hypothesis. However, Kessler pointed out in 1991 that Racism and Sexism: An Integrated Study a treatise by the Jewish Paula Rothenberg was described in Newsweek as the "primer," for multiculturalists. It is so easy for time to wear away the foundation of uncomfortable facts.

Kessler rightly points out that originally there were two schools of thought within the "multiculturalist movement," one, the "particularist," tended to emphasiz that "the experiences of one ethnic group can't have any relevance to members of another," which is nothing more than Boasian "cultural relativity," repackaged for modern consumption. According to Kessler, the other school of thought, "pluralism," "hold[s] to an all-inclusive American history, with an accent on shared experiences." What Kessler realized at the time was that both paradigms are essentially integral parts of the same puzzle, i.e. multiculturalism, and both challenged the "traditionalist" view.

We see this type of dichotomous argument often in American intellectual thought, an alleged division in ideology, but just under the surface a common agenda. More often than not one of the theories is presented in such a way as to appear to be more acceptable than the other, something Kessler also notes:

Pluralists in essence say, "American culture belongs to all of us," as opposed to "American culture belongs to us whites." The particularists, on the other hand have turned this old, exclusive view on end: "American culture does belong to whites; so celebrate your ancestral homeland instead of your present home. Ethnic and racial differences must be accentuated and hatreds fanned.

What we know fourteen years later is that "multiculturalism," won the "fixed," debate, the particularist and pluralist views merged and have left us with a singular idea, American culture does not belong to whites and ethnic and racial differences should be accentuated and hatreds fanned, except where and when whites are concerned. This wasn't an accident; this was the intention all along, something else that Kessler prophetically revealed in her analysis of something that happened at Stanford University in 1988 when the clarion call "Hey, hey, ho, ho, Western culture's got to go," initially went out.

Kessler notes how the very unlikely example of a Guatemalan female Marxist that renounced marriage and motherhood in the pursuit of the Marxist ideal was used to inculcate impressionable young minds, when she cites the fact that Stanford students were encouraged to read I, Rigoberta Menchu a book about exactly that and how that book was supposed to sensitize the students in such a way that they might "understand the perspective of female Marxist Guatemalan peasants of Indian ancestry, not to examine whether the book is valid or contributes to a student's education."

Kessler reveals a good bit of skepticism in 1991, which proved to be quite healthy in that after receiving the Nobel Prize in 1992 Rigoberto was exposed by the New York Times as a fraud. In her memoirs she notes that he brother had died of malnutrition, but a Times reporter found him alive and well, and living prosperously in Guatemala. Not unexpectedly, because central to the thesis of multiculturalism is "white oppression," Rigoberto claims that her impoverished family was subject to intimidation and oppression by "wealthy landowners of European descent." Unfortunately for Rigoberto, her fellow villagers claimed that the "dispute was really a land feud that pitted Rigoberta's father against his in-laws. It was a family quarrel that went on for years and years."

This comes as no surprise to some of us, those who read and embraced I, Rigoberta Menchu in the 1980s however might be somewhat taken aback as the Nobel Prize and her fraudulent memory still stand despite these revelations. Another interesting aspect of this story is that the same people at the Times who initially built up Rigoberto's image in the 1980s were the same ones that exposed her as a fraud in the 1990s possibly a matter of reminding a prima donna that what can be built up can also be broken down.

Kessler continues by highlighting some of the more meaningless infighting within the multiculturalist perspective, i.e. the "pluralists" refer to the "particularists," as "extremists," and the latter believe the former to be unrealistic. Sensational accusations are passed back and forth as though they have some meaning; in actuality they don't. As an example one black professor and advocate of the "pluralist perspective," refers to a Jewish professor of history at Columbia, and "particularist," Diane Ravitch, as "the ultimate, supreme, sophisticated, debonair racist" and a "Texas Jew." Ravitch then exposes the entire dichotomous scheme when she "readily admits, pluralism easily can be, and has been, transformed into particularism. In its concern to include everyone in a new common American history, to be nice to everybody and not leave anyone out, pluralism may well give rise to cultural divisiveness where none might otherwise exist."

Exactly the point, what is indeed rare though is that a senior at Ashland College in 1991 saw through the smoke and mirrors of theoretical multiculturalism, but perspectives like hers were never voiced publicly.

There is no longer any doubt, multiculturalism is a dismal failure as evidenced by the fact that tens of thousands of Americans have signed up voluntarily as part of a popular movement to patrol our nation's borders because our government refuses to do so. It is also quite clear that American society has reached the point where it will no longer silently serve as liberalisms experimental model; it has reached the point of total saturation.

Interestingly, failed liberal models have been quite common over the last one hundred years. They also tend to be extremely destructive and are almost never exposed to any subsequent scrutiny. The common denominator is that they almost always tend to be Kosher, developed and propagated by Jews. The reason they are never exposed is because Jews have monopolized the massive power and influence of the media, whether that be television, newspapers, news magazines, cinema, or through the equally cornered market of academics, American Universities and the publishing houses that provide these Universities with textbooks. For example one learns through the aforementioned mediums that the Bolshevik's employed the concept of collectivization on Russian peasantry with disastrous results. We may also learn that the concept and process of collectivization was subsequently exported to China, North Korea, Cambodia and other Asian nations, but we will never hear that the failed process which led to the deaths of more than ten million Christian Russians and Ukrainians, also failed in China, failed in North Korea and failed in Cambodia with similar results, the deaths of tens of millions!

"Multiculturalism," is nothing more than the newest failed "liberal model," a modern day "collectivization" scheme, an abortive idea that society can't seem to rid itself of. There were many Julie Ann Kessler's fourteen years ago vocally opposing what to them was an obviously flawed system, but they were denounced as racists and/or completely ignored. Today the failure of "multiculturalism," shines as a beacon in all its inglorious ineptitude leaving us the opportunity, and that is what it is, to make the changes necessary to make our country a better place to live in for our children and grandchildren.

Although the concept of "tolerance," is and has always been an American virtue, the people of this country have been taken advantage of.

Is 'Evil' a Real Force in the World?

2008-08-30T07:55:00.000-07:00

.
A few weeks ago, Apollonian, one of the more recent respondents here on World Peace, took issue with Phaedrus over the concept of Evil. Phaedrus has made frequent references to "evil deeds" and "evil people" and so forth, and this respondent (who appears to be pretty well-read in philosophy) objected vehemently and repeatedly to this blogger's frequent use of terms such as "good" and "evil" and so on and tried to win this writer over to his point of view, which is essentially that there is no such thing. Getting bogged down in a dry, academic discussion on what is essentially a matter of personal belief between myself and any respondent would not exactly excite and animate World Peace's readership, so initially it was decided to simply ignore the matter. However, on second thoughts, I have conceived a way in which these matters CAN be addressed in a way which is meaningful to readers and also explains why my stated position on the existence of Evil as a real and highly dangerous force in our lives will not be changing one iota. Here goes....

Phaedrus has always been a great believer in the power of allegory in getting complex concepts more clearly across. It's not necessary in this essay to resort to a full-blown allegory; a simple parable will more than adequately show where I'm coming from on this issue. Apollonian will no doubt leap on what follows and dissect it in extreme detail in the comments section if he so choses and he is free to do so. But I would like to remind him that in so doing, he is not, in any way whatsoever, going to advance the cause in which we are all united, but rather divert attention from it to the benefit of those who would prefer we totally avoid any direct examination of their odious behavior. I refer here in particular to the Jews, of course. In rebutting Apollonian's arguments by way of a parable in essay form rather than by simply following up his comments, we waste no time and effort in letting the Jews off the hook by arguing the matter out in the small print where few people would take notice.

Imagine if you will, a man clinging to a rocky precipice by his fingernails. He has stumbled off a mountain path and is hanging on for dear life. Certain death follows should he lose his fragile grip. A short time later, a group of three walkers pass by the spot: a Christian, a Muslim and a Buddhist. He calls out to them for help. They rush over to him and without any thought for their own safety, pull him back onto the path. Much relieved, he asks them how he can ever thank them. They laugh and tell him no reward is necessary and that any decent person would do the same. The situation is resolved with good feeling all-round. Now rewind this scenario to the beginning and imagine the man clinging once again to the edge of the precipice. This time, a group of Negroes approach. The man calls out to them for assistance, but they just laugh at him, make a few racial slurs and walk by. A moment later, one of them turns back towards the man. Could this be a sudden change of heart? Sadly not, the Negro has spotted the man is wearing a gold watch. Said black person removes the watch and gleefully returns to his friends to show them the spoils.

Rewind this same scenario for the final time. On this occasion, a Jew walks past. The man calls over to him for assistance as with the other passers-by. The Jew walks over, listens to the man's appeals, then thoughtfully strokes his beard. "Aren't you going to help me?" pleads the man in desperation. The Jew looks up and down the path. There's no one else in sight. He reaches down and removes the man's gold watch, just as the Negro did. "OK, OK!" cries the man, "Keep the watch. It's yours. Just help me up!" The Jew quietly slips the watch into his pocket and, taking one more look about him to ensure he remains unobserved, proceeds to stamp on the man's fingertips, forcing him to relinquish his grip and fall to his death.

So in the forgoing example, we have three very different types of behavior exhibited. The first people rescued the man without a second's thought and sought no reward for rendering their assistance. The Negroes, on the other hand, were callously indifferent to the man's plight and robbed him of his watch, leaving him still clinging precariously to the ledge. Finally, the Jew passed by and robbed the man of his watch AND needlessly sent him plunging to his certain death. Apollonian (in accordance with the teachings of Nietzsche and others) conjectures that none of these behaviors evidence either goodness OR evil on the part of the passers-by. This is a standpoint which Phaedrus finds impossible to reconcile with reality. It goes to the core of the problems we face today. Apollonian posits the view that (and I'm sure he'll correct me if I misunderstand him - and probably even if I don't) that there is no such thing as Evil and that what we commonly TAKE to be Evil is simply rather "utter selfishness" on the part of some individuals. They satisfy their needs totally without empathy for others and without the slightest prick of conscience.

To some extent, this may be true. But it is an inchoate picture which seems to have been dreamed up only by those who have been blessed to have had no personal experience of REAL Evil in their lives. They've never seen it up-close-and-personal, so-to-speak. What these people are REALLY describing is PSYCHOPATHIC behavior, which CAN be Evil, but often isn't. There's a key difference that I shall make clear here in this essay, after which I plan to make no further attempt to justify my beliefs to anyone who has no idea of my background, my age, nor how many books I have read, nor of what quality they were. Here's that key difference illustrated by reference to the above parable we examined: The Christian, the Muslim and the Buddhist acted altruistically. They put themselves out to save someone and sought no reward for doing so. Anyone with a lick of common sense is going to say they exhibited "goodness" in so doing. There's very little to argue about here with this first group of people; the REAL essence of the question can only be resolved by examining the behavior of the other two parties: the Negroes and the Jew.

The Negroes exhibited classic psychopathic behavior. They put themselves out not one iota to assist a man in trouble; all they did was steal his watch. Here we have selfish desires satiated with no regard or empathy for the victim. Classic Negro behavior from what we see all the time in the more truthful elements of the news media. But is it actually Evil? In Phaedrus' view, no, it isn't. It's merely self-centered indifference to the suffering of others and a bit of advantage-taking thrown in. Now consider the Jew's response. He failed to assist the man, he stole the man's watch AND he needlessly killed him. He COULD have simply walked away with the watch like the Negroes, but instead, he went just that bit further,when there was NO need, to see the man plunge to his death. This is the whole point of the parable where a form of behavior extends beyond pure indifferent self-enrichment and strays into the realm of Evil. It wasn't NECESSARY to send this man plummeting to his death. The Jew had what he wanted - like the Negro - and could have left it like that. Instead, he felt the inclination to stray into needless, wanton cruelty for no reason but his own sick enjoyment - and THIS is the point where Evil arises and we can see it all around us in the way Jews behave towards others, wherever they may be in the world, there is always this sick element of "gratuitous nastiness" that so typically characterizes their behavior as a race.

Now Phaedrus would be the first to admit that there are plenty of people who consider themselves 'religious' who are anything BUT pious. And there are equally Jews who do NOT exhibit this trait. Furthermore, there ARE honest and civilized black people. But in every case, they are A-typical of their race or creed and do not represent the majority. Patrick Grimm reminded us of the importance of stereotypes; the instilled wisdom of generations which we fail to call upon at our peril when forced to deal with foreigners. Jews and their NWO buddies are at the forefront of rubbishing stereotypes and trying to make stereotyping people a 'thought crime.' Given the primordial nature of the Jews, the impetus behind this piece of social engineering should come as no surprise to us! Who but the Jews and the Negroes would have more to gain from having their essential core natures effaced from the awareness of others?

So there you have it: my justification for using the terms "good" and "evil" and my resolution to CONTINUE to do so for as long as Evil remains such a pervasive force behind Western nations' internal and external policy development!

A Message for Curt Maynard...

2008-08-30T07:52:00.000-07:00

.
I'm not even sure if Curt will get to see this anytime soon, given the problems he reported with his computer, but it needs to be said, anyway.

Bloggers (of whom Curt remains one of THE most prominent) give up a great deal of time and put in enormous effort in trying to inform ordinary people of what is going so wrong in the world today and who precisely is responsible for it all. At times it may seem as though the task is hopeless, but I believe it is far from it, at least all the while people have free access to the internet, then the message can only spread - as indeed it already has and continues to. But even if the entire network were to be shut down tomorrow, bloggers like Curt have ALREADY done their job, for they have set the fuse ablaze...

If Curt never writes another item for the rest of his life, I believe his work is already done. It's out there now in so many forms; re-published, re-distributed, discussed in bars and on buses and trains, at BBQs and house-parties, saved and stored and encrypted on hard drives and memory sticks for future printing and dissemination whenever the appropriate moment arises. So at this point in time, the fuse IS fiercely burning. Whether it continues to thrive and grow - or smolder and die out - depends on the broader mass of the people we are striving to reach. If they continue to sit in front of the Jewbox with the remote control in one hand and a Big Mac in the other; watching such perverse spectacles as American Idol and Larry King, then we as a race ARE doomed - and deserve to be, in all honesty.

But my view of the future is different. I see an ever-increasing awareness on the part of the American couch-potato and once this reaches a certain critical mass, there will be NO stopping it. We have to continue to work towards reaching that critical point by getting this information out by any conceivable means we can. Only then can we be certain that our work has passed that vital tipping point which MUST be reached to ensure what follows will take on an inexorable spirit of its own, sweeping aside the ugliness and dross of this insidious NWO non-culture of depravity; of decadent, self-destructive Liberalism that's been thrust upon us, against the wishes of the majority, for so many decades now. I believe we shall see this happy outcome not just in our lifetimes, but in the VERY near future, as all the lies and deceit of the past 60 years unravel before the eyes of the world and more and more people finally wake up to it - and take some long-overdue action!

Who the HELL are Western Governments Really Serving??

2008-08-25T07:58:00.000-07:00

.
As the party convention season opens, Phaedrus surveys the vultures pecking over the wreckage of our terminally broken Western 'democracies.'

Like you, no doubt, this blogger has grown tired of having to put the 'our' of "our government" in inverted commas. To speak of "our government" - whether you're reading this in the US, the UK or the rest of Europe somehow just doesn't sound right. The discussion groups and blogs are full of it - and little wonder. 'Our' so-called governments aren't serving We The People at all, but rather the interests of some unsavory alien entity. And it matters not in which country you reside, wherever you may be reading this, friend. It matters not which colors your party flies; they - whoever they may be in YOUR country - are NOT working for YOU. It's just such a pity that the majority of your compatriots haven't, unlike you (one assumes) woken up to this fact.

One could take any one of dozens of Western countries as an example. The situation is the same. Everywhere you look, 'our' governments are taking a great big collective SHIT on the lot of us. There are some countries where this is more apparent than others. Let's take the United States as a leading example. We all know by now that politicians lie to us morning, noon and night. The (Jewish) prime minister of Hungary even puplicly boasted about the fact not long ago. But let's stick to the US for the sake of argument. What has Washington DC ever done for the average, decent American over the last several decades but take a great big SHIT on him or her? As far as every recent administration has been concerned, we're just simple-minded dupes to be milked for THEIR benefit. Democrats and Republicans alike; there's not a scintilla of difference between them.

Once you strip away all the smarmy, patronizing, empty rhetoric; THEIR interests comprise enriching themselves at our collective expense on the one hand, and defending the parasite pseudo-state of 'Israel' on the other. Period. You want a pointer? In 1948, George Orwell wrote 'Nineteen-Eighty-Four' in which he postulated an endless, contrived state of war between various superpower blocs such as 'Eurasia' and 'Oceania.' Token victories in one region immediately presaged the announcement of war with the next power bloc in an unending cycle. It was a future dystopia in which the world was constantly at war - it mattered not with whom, so long as there was an enemy of some identifiable description to fight. The ideology of said enemy was entirely academic; the only thing that ultimately mattered was there was SOME enemy to persue and SOME blood to be shed SOMEWHERE.

The US has had more than its fair share of wars, and lately we've practically threatened every other country to join in the killing spree (or else!) What exactly was the Korean war of the 1950s supposed to achieve? What DID it achieve? It certainly lined the pockets of those invested in the armaments industry, but that was the only 'beneficial' outcome. Likewise with Vietnam. We were told we were fighting Communism at the time. Well, what the hell business of ours was it if some no-account little country on the far side of the world wanted to adopt a different political system to ours? Was it not THEIR affair and theirs alone? Over fifty thousand young Americans wantonly slaughtered during that conflict and nothing achieved bar our humiliating and ignominious ejection from Saigon in 1975. How did fighting THAT war benefit the working American? And did it not much diminish us in the eyes of the civilized world?

Frank Weltner of Jew Watch has compiled a long list of every conflict the US has been involved with over the last 100 years and claims that we've lost every last one of them. What of World Wars 1 and 2? "We won those, didn't we!" you may angrily insist. Well, did we - REALLY? I think not. A lot of Jewish bankers made VAST fortunes out of them; the rest of us just had to pay for their gains with our blood, dollars and bad-will abroad. It's the same thing with arms races and the Cold War. These enterprises cost us a fortune in blood and dollars with nothing whatever to show for it all at the end of the day. And now the Neocon-artists want to start a new Cold War, "CW2" with Russia and are doing everything in their power to bring it about. Russia's not interested in confrontation. The Russians have found their feet again after a horribly long dalliance with chronic Jew-instilled Marxism and now just want to live in peace and prosperity. Cue America to yet AGAIN get involved and fuck things up.

How do you think it plays abroad when Israel invades Palestinian territory (yet again) and the US sits on its hands and refuses to condemn the Jews? How does it look abroad when the only support for the unsupportable at the UN Security Council comes from the US? How does it help our standing abroad when we refuse to condemn Israel's periodic pogroms against the Arabs, yet we jump on Russia in five seconds flat for defending its own people against Zionazi aggression in its own back-yard? How does having Arab 'terrorists' openly brutalized in front of the world's media in Cuba serve the interests of the average, hard-working American? Does it not stoke up justifiable hatred against us abroad? No? Well how about when pictures emerge of us torturing Arabs within the confines of Abu G'raib? Was it simply a terrible blunder that those jail photos emerged, or was it rather PLANNED IN ADVANCE PURPOSELY TO STIR UP FURTHER HATRED AND RESENTMENT AGAINST US?

"Phaedrus, you must be crazy!" I hear you cry. (Well, actually I don't, as I know if you're here reading this, you're smarter than that). However, we should point out for the uninitiated that there IS ONE beneficiary to be found from all this bad-will that is being generated against us, and that, my friends, is the Jew. All these events are in good measure contrived to draw the United States into the battle against Israel's enemies by stirring up hatred against us on the part of foreigners, who when otherwise left alone, would be quite happy to leave our people in peace. The Jews that have taken over Western governments (the US in particular due to its kind-heartedness towards 'refugees') have taken every available opportunity to drag us into endless, unjustifiable wars against THEIR enemies. They don't like having to fight for themselves, you see, since our blood is so much cheaper than theirs - and their Holy Book tells them so.

We continue to pay to fund this sickening, supremacist belief of theirs with the blood of our own families. It's as simple as that. None of this eternal sacrifice benefits the average American one iota. Hitching up our wagon to Israel's juggernaut is a lose-lose situation for every last one of us: blood, bones, dollars and cents. The Jews must be tearing their hair out by now. All this provocation of theirs against all-comers and STILL no realistic prospect of a GENUINE terrorist attack against the United States. No wonder then, the need for Israeli-contrived false flags. The false flag attack is a stunt so lowdown, mean-minded and dirty that no one with any shred of decency and honor could ever conceive of it. Small wonder then that it is the tool of choice for Israeli's MOSSAD secret service.

Finally, talking of false-flag operations, isn't the situation off the coast of Georgia a convenient 'accident' waiting to happen? Bush said he wouldn't send military ships to bring aid to this former Soviet satellite, but gee, he must have changed his mind! A US destroyer just turned up off the coast yesterday. No doubt the crew mean well and are nothing more than innocent saps; just sitting ducks for an Israeli submarine torpedo strike which can be credibly blamed on the justifiably irate Russians. This is not so far-fetched as you might imagine. The Jews have pulled at least one such operation off before under LBJ and probably many more that we have insufficient evidence for. So any of our sailors serving in the course of this 'relief operation' for Georgia had better not sleep on the job, for there are Jews about and as always, they're up to no good.

A World Turned Upside Down

2008-08-21T07:52:00.000-07:00

.
You know, some nights it gets kind of difficult to get to sleep and one's mind naturally strays toward all the purposely-contrived-against-us problems of this world and their possible solutions. Some 37 years ago, the heavyweight British academic historian, Christopher Hill, wrote The World Turned Upside Down, the subject of which being the very peculiar way in which most of the world was ordered during the English Revolutionary period, and how it was in fact the very reverse of what it ought to be for good governance and orderly societies to flourish. There is still no better description for our sorry condition today as the title of Hill's original classic; proving that nothing much has changed in more than 300 years.

In almost every sphere of our existence, it is all too easy to look around and see that all is not well. There's a massive and explosive core of chaos and madness just beneath the surface veneer of order the media tries to portray as our reality. This 'surface order' that generally obscures the underlying chaos from most folks' eyes is thinner than a tightly stretched balloon skin. All too frequently this tenuous membrane ruptures and we get to briefly glimpse something truly dreadful beneath it. So it was with the attacks of September 11, 2001. That day was a defining moment for so many of us in various ways, but for Phaedrus, the true Epiphany arising from it was not to follow for another 6 years; so effective had the mainstream media been in their shielding of the guilty.

For many years before 9/11, however, it was clear SOMETHING was desperately wrong. It APPEARED so often that western governments were working AGAINST their citizens' interests rather than on behalf of them. No new measures these governments introduced EVER seemed likely to benefit the host populations of these countries. The beneficiaries were ALWAYS foreigners of one sort or another. Always, always, always. The native populations could go to hell for all these governments seemed to care, that much alone was clear. It was especially apparent in the US, the UK and Germany back then, but the disease seems to have spread to Canada, France and some other places more recently.

The putting of other people's interests first is supposed to be a noble sentiment, and it can be - up to a point. But that point became FAR exceeded in all the above-named countries. Preferential treatment given to newcomers of other races took on a very much less benign appearance once it became apparent the needs and aspirations of the host populations were not simply being casually sidelined, but contemptuously subordinated and increasingly CRUSHED. After many years of seeing this program of globalization / internationalization roll unremittingly onward, it became increasingly difficult to view it as anything other than an aggressively on-going plot to swamp native, superior cultures and influences with foreign, inferior ones, thereby ultimately wiping the former, host cultures out.

Upon coming to this conclusion, of course, the rational man questions his own sanity. The very idea is absurd! It's pure paranoia! "Our governments have just bought a little too deeply into this Internationalist fad that's currently in vogue," we assure ourselves, "in time they'll realize they've gone a bit too far and the mood will swing around again." Well, from where this blogger is sitting, there's no sign of any slowing down or course change likely from those who ru(i)n our lives. Those who object to being swamped by foreign influences are derided as "racists" or "narrow-minded nationalists" or "haters" and their views aren't aired at all by the mainstream media. It's as if they either don't exist, or else their crazy, right-wing views are too marginal to be worthy of airtime.

Our so-called leaders lie to us, too. They lie endlessly and they always have. They rely on us having short memories and being too tied up just trying to survive to actually analyze what they SAY and what they DO and the ENORMOUS gulf that separates the words from the deeds. The truth is that it is those in government who are our REAL enemies, not some imaginary Islamic 'terrorist' throwing a rock somewhere in the Middle East. Aldous Huxley spelled it out for us half a century ago. He warned us that our governments (in combination with what he called the Power Elite) never stop working AGAINST us: we, the people who foolishly put them where they are. This statement probably would have struck many as pretty crazy even as recently as 10 years ago, but increasingly no longer, thankfully.

Prior to 9/11, it was argued by many that western governments had at least attempted, in good faith, to make the world a better place; it was simply that whatever they did they couldn't win. It might have been down to incompetence, laziness, nepotism, poor decision-making - corruption, even. But nonetheless, most folks believed that their imperfect governments were at least TRYING to make the world a better place. The events of 9/11, however, should disabuse us of any such false notions concerning the 'goodwill' of our leaders. 9/11 was the biggest rupture yet in the notional 'normalcy membrane' referred to above. We now know these horrific attacks were not the work of Arab extremists, but rather of domestic US agencies headed by Bush & Cheney and operating with the full blessing of those two traitors. The evidence is overwhelming and unanswerable.

This is a leap of faith that a lot of people understandably find very difficult indeed to make. It's very hard to suspend a life-long unquestioning belief in our president and government. But the evidence means we MUST, and waking up to the reality DOES bear fruit once you get past the initial sickening shock and disgust that these FILTH could do such unspeakable things to their own people. An awful lot of other stuff in other areas starts falling neatly into place whereas it hadn't made sense before. Once a person finally comes to accept Huxley's assertion that it is our own governments that are the REAL enemy, then the fog lifts from their eyes and they can see much more clearly what is ACTUALLY happening, WHY it's happening and in WHOSE selfish interest it is happening.

9/11 gave us such an invaluable insight into the way these entities think that the events of that day must NEVER be allowed to be forgotten. They are a powerful illustration of how despicably low governments can stoop in order to further the ends of themselves and their paymasters. When that fragile balloon skin tore that day, we glimpsed the horrors of what an out-of-control government is capable of. These people have the minds of monsters. There is clearly NOTHING they are not capable of doing in their pursuit of world domination. They have done MORE THAN ENOUGH to warrant being descended upon by massed ranks of the country's armed patriots and the time for action is fast approaching. Meanwhile, let's continue to get the message out and spare no effort in telling folks what these demons incarnate are REALLY all about...

USA to Destroy Russia in a Pre-emptive nuclear strike?

2008-08-18T04:53:00.000-07:00

.
Some time last year on this blog, Phaedrus warned that Russia was under grave danger from the US and other Western nations for its continuing refusal to knuckle-under and align itself with the New World Order's agenda to bring about unitary world government and a borderless planet where, with very few exceptions, all the peoples of the world would be permitted to re-locate to other countries and there settle, interbreed and intermarry with the host populations. This rampant promotion of Internationalism is THE key plank of the NWO's plans for a single, unitary government for ALL peoples, who will be FORCED to live together with ALL others, whether they like it or not - and take it from us: they WONT. Why not? We have seen enough of the program rolled out so far for us to be able to confidently say that even its partial implementation has been nothing short of DISASTROUS.

Since making this somewhat speculative prediction (as it may have seemed at that time) WP has seen absolutely no evidence whatsoever that could lead to any revision of the above-stated position in the slightest way. If anything, the situation has developed between then and now in a way which encourages us to believe that the US government is hell-bent on taking on the Russians with every means at their disposal as a matter of priority. This situation should be of the greatest concern for all peace-loving people the world over, but particularly when the bellicose threats in question are originating from not just the world's most heavily-armed nuclear power, but also the power which has recently stated on record that it now reserves the right to preemptively use nuclear weapons in a FIRST STRIKE against any serious perceived threat(!)

Now, this is a massive change in the delicate balance of power between nuclear-armed nations. It is quite staggering that it has received such little press coverage in the mainstream media (I jest, of course, since they and the government constitute in effect a unitary entity). The fact is, such a statement which openly asserts the right to 'first use' of nuclear weapons against other nations constitutes a HUGE change over the prior policy which kept the peace in Europe and America (albeit at terrible risk) for more than half a century. Yet that is what Bush has said on record and we would be foolish to doubt the man, given he is demonstrably capable of every evil under the sun in the way that few of his predecessors could have conceived of. Bush is, after all, the Godfather of 9/11. That makes him and those around him uniquely evil adversaries.

It still sounds strange to say it, but Russia is the shining new Beacon of Liberty in the 21st Century. It now reflects the founding values of the young America of the 18th Century in many ways, whereas the NEW America of our own bitter experience comprised of the last 5 decades, has come more and more to resemble Stalin's Soviet Union of the 1930s. Russia looks after its own people - as well it should. America, on the other hand, has nothing but CONTEMPT for its own people and puts them at the bottom of the pecking order behind every kind of criminal immigrant piece of dusky, raping, robbing rubbish you can imagine. Which is the better model to follow? It's not exactly a tough question, is it? Perversely, this insistence on putting its own people's interests FIRST above those of foreigners is what is at the core of the West's beef with Mother Russia today. Self-interest and Nationalism are on the rise in Russia today and that is a frightening prospect indeed for the grubby, disingenuous Jews that run our Western world.

The great battle of ideas today in the early 21st Century, and the one which may very easily now slip into all-out nuclear conflict, is between those on the political left who support the concept of Internationalism and multiculturalism; and those (not necessarily always on the right) who support peaceful, non-interventionist Nationalism and self-interest. If the truth were known, however, self-interest and Nationalism is the quite proper and healthy belief system shared by the overwhelming majority of people in the world. Anyone who claims differently is probably a Marxist agitator spinning the usual lies. You can see these Arch Liars beavering away 24/7 on all major TeeVee networks here in the States and Europe with much of their programming underlining their nauseating Afro-centric focus.

So Russia, God bless Her, has served notice to the world that she will not fall into lock-step with the rest of the Jew-conned lemmings consisting of the US, the UK, Germany, France, Italy etc., yet in doing so has drafted and published her own Death Warrant. Russia is too important a country to be consigned to after-thought mopping up operations once the main conquest is completed. She now sticks out like a sore thumb as a bulwark against the insidious spread of neocon-artist hegemony around the world and that cannot be allowed by our self-appointed Masters in Tel Aviv and their agents in London and Washington. This is an appropriate point, Phaedrus believes, upon which to quote an age-old conundrum from classical physics: what happens when an irresistible force meets an immovable object? The theorists conjecture that the immovable object is destroyed. In this analogy, the irresistible force is the New World Order and the immovable object, standing in its way, is Russia.

So in WP's view (and we are not alone in coming to this scary conclusion) Russia as we know it will have to be destroyed. The demands and exigencies behind the roll-out of the NWO are too strong to be resisted. They have acquired a head of steam that can no longer be quenched by conventional means. Senior members of the NWO front organizations have stated on record that they WANT TO SEE THE RESULTS OF THEIR LABORS IN THEIR LIFETIMES). This drives the Agenda onwards with even greater urgency born from the fact that these 'senior members' - men lIke David Rockefeller, Evelyn de Rothschild and Denis Healey are all staring death through old-age in the face. They have very little time left in this incarnation. They have labored all their lives to fulfill this goal and so understandably, they want to see it come to fruition before they pass on to hell.

The message for Russia is simple. The NWO (which controls the West and had attempted to control YOU too after the collapse of the old USSR) no longer believes it can control you. You have become effectively a renegade province of the NWO. You have seen how it works and you understandably want out. YOU, uniquely, know at first hand the bitter devastation that following the Marxist ideology embraced by the New World Order costs a nation and a people. That makes you dangerous. Your brave, handsome, young, white patriots, "Commissars" as you have dubbed them, terrify the Jews that run the West. Nationalism, healthy as it is for nation states, is the antithesis of what the NWO preaches, because NWO policy formation is built around WEAKENING successful nation states. therefore, your recognition of the plan's true intentions means you - the immovable object - must be destroyed.

So draw your defense plans well, ethnic brothers. Forewarned is forearmed and you are now forewarned. Never trust the Americans. Never trust the British, the French, the Italians, the Germans or any other country that has fallen into the clutches of the NWO. All their foreign policy formulators are ultimately JEWS who would joyfully bring you to your knees in abject, radio-active squalor. The "international community" consists of layered structures of perfidious JEWS (frequently under false names) who claim to represent 'their' adopted countries but in truth represent nothing but themselves and Zionist interests and charge their 'services' to the taxpayers of the countries concerned for their duplicitous gerrymandering. Russia - you have been warned. These filth want you destroyed and will stop at nothing to achieve their evil aims. TAKE APPROPRIATE ACTION TO PROTECT YOURSELVES AND YOUR PEOPLE WHILST YOU STILL CAN. TIME IS INCREASINGLY SHORT!

Russia gives NWO the finger. Expect further flashpoints!

2008-08-15T08:37:00.000-07:00

.
Well, by the time there were a few moments available at this keyboard to comment on the interesting situation arising in the Caucuses, it was evident that others in the blogosphere had already leaped, perfectly properly, to Russia's defense. It is indeed good to see how so many people are now seeing through the lies of the US government and providing a counterpoint to the Jew-riddled mainstream media's heavily anti-Russia biased coverage.

There are just a couple of additional points it seems many have overlooked, however. Firstly, note the extraordinary degree of swiftness with which the so-called "international Community" acted to condemn Russia's actions against Georgia. There were multiple calls for a ceasefire virtually from the moment the first bullet was fired! Contrast this robust response with a similar situation last year when Israel attacked Hezbollah. The "International Community" were unaccountably silent as the Jews wantonly destroyed Palestinian homes and lives with the full force of its military. A full three weeks went by before anyone in the West ventured to suggest a pause in the carnage whilst peace talks be given a chance. These timid voices only received any degree of support when it became clear a little while later than the Israeli aggressor was getting its own butt soundly kicked by the other side and a ceasefire would give them a valuable breather! How typical when so many Western governments are crawling with Jews and their toadies. Do the NWO-ers seriously expect people not to notice yet another example of preferential treatment being given to the Middle East's eternal agitators, Israeli Jews?

It was also interesting to note that in his plaintiff appeals to the West to come and rescue him from the mess he had gotten himself into, Georgia's president made his desperate pleas from behind a desk where a European Union flag was prominently displayed. Georgia isn't even a member of the EU, nor NATO, to whom he also pleaded for protection! What a silly man. Not just silly, but murderous and duplicitous, too. A megalomaniac with designs on wiping out the presence of peaceable ethnic Russians in his country's northern regions. I think it would be a VERY bad idea to have such a warmongering little bully granted NATO membership.The consequences for world peace could be very grave indeed. Georgia will only need the backup of other nations all the time it has this jerk running the country. He's a loose cannon and a traitor to his people. He has aspirations of delivering Georgia into the grasp of the NWO through NATO and EU membership, both of which he seems to feel is his country's destiny. Well, it ISN'T.

Russia stood up and did the only thing a principled nation could do when its own people were being slaughtered wholesale by an enemy government; it drove the aggressors out with a tough message never to dream of ever doing anything so criminally insane again. One can but hope the lesson has been learned, but judging by this tin-pot little Bolshevik malcontent's subsequent outbursts, this hope seems already dashed. He will have the pay a further price yet if he does not SHUT THE FUCK UP in his belligerent pronouncements on the region and how the country will "never surrender to Russian imperialist aggression." This is not the kind of measured, diplomatic language that leads to the restoration of peace and good relations. Russia under its new prime minister Medvedev has sent out a strong signal not to fuck with Russia's security, particularly when the tinkering is taking place in its own backyard.

This is an unmistakable signal which Poland and the Czech Republic might care to think well on, too, since their plans to accommodate US missile bases on Russia's Western flank represent a major threat to the mother country from yet another direction and their planned construction - yesterday formally agreed in the case of Poland - simply cannot be allowed to go ahead. Russia remains under grave threat from the US over its refusal to sign up to the NWO 'one world' Agenda, and this insidious erosion of the buffer protection afforded by its former satellite countries constitute on-going menacing developments aimed ultimately at the destruction of Russia and the seizure of its mineral wealth. Bush's assurances to the contrary aren't worth Jack. Here is a man who is quite happy to wipe out 3,000 of his OWN ordinary, working people on one black day back in 2001, let alone oil-rich foreigners. The time is NOW for Russia to take an implacably robust stance against the coordinated NWO assault it has been subjected to over the last few years, as the robber barons that fleeced the country back in the early 90s greedily eye up its material riches for the final kill.

An Horrific Sickness Cloaked in Utmost Secrecy

2008-08-11T06:02:00.000-07:00

.
Following on from a highly disturbing earlier item entitled "The most shocking thing you'll ever read about the Jews" - which for some unaccountable reason Google blanked out of its blog search results (at LEAST temporarily) Phaedrus 'enjoyed' a couple of very uncomfortable nights' sleep in going over and over similar atrocities perpetrated against children and attempting to arrive at some common, unifying basis linking these, the gravest of seemingly unconnected crimes.

This blogger was given extra impetus by the latest news from Jersey (one of the UK's Channel Islands situated between Britain and France). Some months ago, following serious allegations from a number of islanders, Jersey authorities began to search the grounds of an old children's home for evidence that some of the children once-resident there had been ill-treated. Some informants went further to say that a number of children had actually been murdered whilst supposedly "in care." The abuse alleged had been chronic and spanned the '60s, '70s and '80s. Funny how these things only ever come out YEARS later, isn't it?

It wasn't easy to follow the progress of the investigation, notwithstanding it had attracted international media attention. The Jersey authorities were pretty tight-lipped about the discoveries they slowly made. Maybe they were concerned about damage to the Island's reputation or maybe they were motivated by something more sinister. We couldn't tell at the time and so the investigation, such as it was, ground slowly on. Meanwhile, reports began to circulate that a man - possibly an ex-staffer at the home - had been going round threatening some of the witnesses not to give evidence in the matter.

This person was obviously keen to ensure that the investigation should proceed no further. He was pulled in by police for questioning and later released. Who he is and what the nature of the alleged threats were was not made public, to the best of this blogger's knowledge. Curious, since witness intimidation is rightly regarded as a serious matter in any civilized society, and Jersey is well-known tax-haven with a very high percentage of super-rich residents. It's not the utopia it once was, though with some drunkenness and theft committed by seasonal visitors; but the rule of law prevails there - one would hope at any rate - as anywhere else.

Eventually, all the digging and searching with specially-trained dogs and ground-penetrating radar bore fruit. Child remains WERE found. Over further weeks of excavation, the authorities were able to confirm that they had uncovered the skeletons of FIVE children hidden in two underground adjoining cellars. So, we have the skeletal remains of 5 children, bearing out what the original informants had asserted. So we have the complainants themselves, who were children at the home during the relevant period, and who named the names of those in charge at that time who were culpable for these terrible acts. A pretty water-tight case, you might imagine? Better yet, those allegedly responsible are still alive today - and living in comfortable retirement!

It turns out, however, that the Island's prosecuting authorities are NOT planning on even CHARGING ANYONE! Despite a mountain of excellent evidence, they are not minded to proceed any further with the case! The reason given? The recovered bones of the dead children could not be dated accurately enough and they could have been killed earlier than the period in question. Sounds odd? Phaedrus believes the term, "stinks to high heaven" is more appropriate. This pathetic EXCUSE - which is clearly what it is - is a downright lie. In today's world of ultra-sophisticated forensic science, IT IS UTTER BULLSHIT!!

But why would those with the ultimate say-so want to protect those guilty of the foulest, most criminal and bestial of deeds? And the case in Jersey is lamentably far from unique. There was a similar case alleging (Satanic) abuse of children on a remote Scottish island some years before. Nothing ever came of that, either. In fact every few years, it seems, certain authorities in a number of supposedly civilized countries make headlines world-wide by announcing that they've smashed extensive, international internet pedophile rings, where many of the perpetrators turned out to be (shockingly) outwardly respectable professional types: lawyers, police-officers, accountants, judges and even doctors!

But in every case, for some inexplicable reason, these spectacular cases involving all these 'upstanding pillars of society' never ever even reach the trial stage. Someone higher up takes over the case papers and sees to it that the investigation grinds quietly to a standstill. We hear all about the initial busts, which are understandably trumpeted triumphantly by the diligent work of the departments who track down these filth; yet years later, not a single trial or conviction emerges. I think we can safely surmise that those who target children for torture and slaughter have friends in very high places who presumably share the same sickness for the blood of innocent children. That's one hell of a deeply disturbing conclusion to have to reach, but what other reasonable inference can anyone make?

What becomes of these waifs and strays? Ultimately, we know, they are slaughtered in some way. God only knows what unspeakable evil befalls them before their traumatized souls leave this world. The healthy mind, to protect its own sanity, prefers to believe none of these horrors are true. It would be nice if we could just look away and pretend such things don't happen in this day. But they DO and this blogger for one cannot simply sit back and ignore it. Whether the children die in the making of 'snuff movies' or meet their end in ritual Jewish/Satanic slayings to bring the perpetrators the riches and material success they crave at any price from their God is hard to say when all the investigations to date have ended in blatant cover-ups.

Some further things we can infer from what little we DO know is that this practice of ritual child-murder is widespread and very highly organized, from sourcing suitable children right down to their eventual disposal. We can state with some confidence that "higher authorities" are complicit in this scandal and some may even take an active part in the rites themselves. In addition to Jews and Satanists, there is also a sinister cloud hanging over senior Freemasons - "the Brotherhood" as they like to think of themselves. The UK judiciary and law enforcement agencies are absolutely RIDDLED with senior members of this most infamous secret society. They have a solemn pact of mutual assistance to get each other 'off the hook' should any one of them become a "brother in distress" as they call it.

We have agencies around the world who do a wonderful job in trying to track down missing children and return them safely to their parents, hopefully gathering enough evidence along the way to ensure their abductors spend the rest of their miserable, wretched lives rotting in jail. Sadly, however, the sterling efforts of these good people are being subverted by the evils inherent in certain secret societies like the Freemasons, who have links in so many places along the chain that any attempt to bring the worst perpetrators to justice is invariably thwarted.
This is a mind-blowing scandal of the ghastliest and vilest kind. Those in the chain of command in prosecuting authorities who unaccountably drop sensitive investigations, or otherwise impede them, must be exposed, placed on full public trial, cross-examined ruthlessly until the truth is out, then punished in an appropriately severe manner. We should consider plea bargains for some underlings, so the whole rotten upper-edifice of these evil-doers can be removed from their positions of high public influence - and summarily executed.

A sincere apology to anyone who's ever tried to contact us...

2008-08-09T06:54:00.000-07:00

.
Sorry, folks. This really is very, very overdue, but if you have tried to e-mail World Peace with any form of communication since this blog began some 16 months ago, you will not have received any reply or even acknowledgment. Not only that, but whatever you sent would never even have reached us since all emails have been blocked upstream since day one for security reasons. This has been one of the major reasons why WP's rankings are considerably lower those of other comparable blogs. The reasons behind this 'paranoid stance' will be explained below.

Because of the way things are, the only way you CAN make yourself known is through the comments section, which is of course, readable by everyone and anyone can post to it. There really is no practical alternative, sadly. We have no idea who we are REALLY dealing with; who is genuine and who isn't; emails can be easily forged and intercepted; spyware can be readily downloaded. Such are the times in which we live when telling the Truth has become a crime and one can have one's life destroyed by the evil-doers who currently (but not for very much longer) call all the shots.

At the present time, we're all tapping away on our keyboards relatively undisturbed by our enemies, but that situation is constantly under attack by them. They never cease scheming up ways to deprive us of our liberties and this amazingly powerful tool, the Internet, has given them their biggest headache since the invention of radio. Make no mistake about it: THEY BADLY WANT US ALL SHUT DOWN. If WE had been complicit in 9/11 and all the other horrors that have been visited on the world through our enslavement to Jewish interests, WE TOO would do everything in our power to prevent the truth from coming out. They are no different. Only this remarkable and vital document, the Constitution, and our unremitting defense of it can save us.

For a recent example, notice Bush in his hypocritical lecture to the Chinese about human rights? Note he chided them NOT about their curbs on free speech, but rather on their restrictions on the FREEDOM OF THE PRESS. A big and important distinction – take note. It's not hard to imagine, in a country that ratified the Patriot Act, that the stroke of a tyrant's pen could see us all whisked away in the middle of the night to some internment camp, held indefinitely as 'enemies of the state.' For the time being, however, THEY are keeping tabs on who we are and where we are, so when the tyrant finally signs our lives away, we can be swiftly and cleanly taken out. We at WP don't plan on joining y'all at the government's special summer camp, that's all!

20 steps to a better America - by Curt Maynard

2008-08-09T06:51:00.000-07:00

.
Curt's been doing a little original thinking of the 'refreshing' kind. WP doesn't endorse all of what follows in its entirety, but many of the points it raises should form the basis of urgent further discussion.

By Curt Maynard

The below is all theoretical - it is protected under the First Amendment as free speech. It is not meant to be a threat, nor should it be taken as such by anyone. Once again, it is all theoretical.

1. The first thing the United States military must do is employ U.S. submarines and surface ships in an effort to begin shadowing Israeli submarines and prepare for a preemptive strike upon them if they get within range of American cities.

2. Immediately cease and desist the delivery of any and all weapon systems and ammunition to the Zionist state. Ignore any threats that will inevitably follow – if the Zionists have low yield nuclear weapons in U.S. cities as Seymour Hersh claimed they did [or still do] in Russia, so be it – if they [Israel and Jewry itself] use them, they seal their own fate.

3. Use the military to seize the entire media apparatus, from television stations, to newspapers, to magazines, to publishing houses – the first thing the Zionists will do is scream anti-Semitism, but if the media is out of their hands, nobody will hear them. The irony in this will be absolutely delicious, their carefully accrued media monopoly will be used against them – there will be no way for them to disseminate information, they’ll be in the same position as the alternative media they have done their best to silence over the last sixty years. Once the media apparatus out of the hands of the Zionists, massive deprogramming should begin immediately, 24/7 broadcasting to dispels the lies of the last 100 years, especially the last sixty-one years. Within three weeks the Zionist state won’t have an ally left in the United States.

4. Cleanse the military of the Zionist presence – this won’t be difficult – the Zionists have made many enemies who’ll be more than happy to assist in this venture. What one does with these former officers is of little concern, jail them or release them, without authority they will be completely marginalized. The United States Air Force and Navy should be most particularly targeted – anyone attempting to get military units to kill American citizens should be immediately shot without any hesitation.

5. Arrest any and all traitors in the United States government, have no mercy, show no compassion, anyone that can be linked to the support of the Zionist state should be immediately imprisoned with a future trial to look forward to.

6. All Jews in government, in the media, in academia, and in the medical and scientific professions should be immediately, albeit temporarily relieved of any and all responsibilities. If they are loyal to the United States of America they’ll suffer this burden in relative silence, if they aren’t they’ll become militantly resistant. If they become resistant, additional steps will be necessary to neutralize them.

7. America’s Universities should be immediately purged of anyone with a pro-Zionist and/or a pro-Israel record. Excessively liberal professors should be suspended with pay and temporarily relieved of their duties. All professors should be evaluated in order to judge whether or not they are to be “re-educated” prior to returning to their teaching duties.

8. America’s criminal underground should be ruthlessly purged – a one-time warning should be provided, if anyone is caught engaging in organized criminal enterprise they will be harshly dealt with. What happens to them is of no concern to a healthy society. “Organized criminal Enterprise” would include anyone associated with any “secret society,” that sought to engage in any subversive activities against the established state. The Constitution should only be considered when and where any real questions exist as to the individual’s guilt. Initially Jews should receive no Constitutional protections.

9. Israel should be completely isolated – if other states choose to engage in trade and/or dialogue with the Zionist state, America should disengage with that state and if possible convince other nations to ostracize them and apply sanctions against the errant entity. All financial dealings with the Zionist state should immediately cease – it should be made a crime to send monies and/or any form of aid to Israel. If any authentic and constitutionally protected American citizens choose to aid Israel, they may do so after giving up their citizenship and leaving the United States of America. If they insist their religious views demand such action, so be it, let them serve the Lord outside the boundaries of the United States. Once citizenship has been renounced, they should receive no special attention.

10. The entire judicial branch should be immediately and ruthlessly purged – all Jews should be removed forthwith and never allowed to practice law again within the boundaries of the United States of America. American government entities shall never engage in dialogue and/or business relations with foreign Jews. If a foreign government wants to engage in dialogue with the United State’s they’ll find a non-Jewish ambassador.

11. All Jewish assets shall be immediately seized, and reparations paid to non-Jewish American citizens only. Any private property possessed by Jews will be confiscated – their bank accounts emptied, and the contents of their safety deposit boxes searched and appropriated. They’ll receive a receipt for items confiscated and if said items are later found to have been obtained legally and non-parasitically they’ll be returned. Anyone caught assisting Jews to hide assets and/or transfer them should be dealt with harshly.

12. The Department of Education in its entirely will be immediately disbanded. Individual schools will choose their own curriculum – a Board of Education composed of citizens within their own respective districts will oversee the schools. Massive deprogramming of American students should begin immediately – any educators that balk and/or refuse to participate should be removed from the school system and their teaching credentials stripped.

13. The Department of State will be carefully scrutinized – all Jews removed – and others vigilantly screened.

14. The United States military will ask permission of Arab countries to remain in certain authorized areas within Iraq, their primary concern and objective will be changed to Israel. The vast majority of troops will be removed and repositioned along the Mexican-United States border with Fort Bliss, Texas acting as the central authority. A fence will be immediately built – a massive educational campaign within Mexico will begin, utilizing leaflets if necessary, informing Mexican citizens that they will be shot if the cross the fence. Repatriation of all illegal aliens will begin immediately – the Mexican government will be paid a specific sum of money annually for a period of not more than five years to assist them in resettlement of their citizens. If the Mexican government refuses to accept their citizenry they will be settled in refugee camps along the Rio Grande until the Mexican government can be sufficiently pressured to accept them. The expense will be high, but in the end well worth it. All troops in Afghanistan and in any number of other countries will be sent home and will respect the sovereignty of foreign nations, no matter their political and/or religious orientation. No restitution whatsoever will be paid – the respective countries will be informed that the previous government of the United States was a criminal organization and was not legally acting as the representative of the American people period. If these governments fail – that’s their problem.

15. Circumcision of American non-Jewish males will stop immediately – a massive re-educational campaign will be launched over the newly acquired television media and the truth about circumcision will be told – that there are no hygienic reasons whatsoever to be circumcised – it is and has always been a Jewish lie.

16. Revisionist history will be obligatory in all grades. Germany and Germans will be rehabilitated in the minds of Americans, the entire Israel/Palestine issue will be presented in a truly balanced manner, WWI and WWII will be presented with the current curriculum, which is designed to elicit an emotional, rather than intellectual response/opinion will be removed from the classroom. Political correctness will be scourged from society, affirmative action programs dropped, and America returned to a meritocracy. Minorities will receive their constitutionally protected rights and no more. Well-known Americans, i.e. movie stars, politicians, academics, and the like will be scrutinized by “patriotic organizations,” those that supported the status quo and became wealthy as a result will be exposed. Americans [past and present] that attempted to expose the corruption of government and Jewish influence will be rehabilitated publicly, many will receive stipends, including widows, etc… School children will be required to know many of their names and be able to recite what it is/was that they said/wrote.

17. Border security along the Canadian border will be turned over to the County Sheriff in each respective county along the border – the sheriff will be given supreme authority in this area, he can gather evidence as he likes, prosecute the cases, judge them and carry out the sentence. Each sheriff will be overseen by a central authority; one designed to monitor the sheriff and the sheriff’s department. Corruption in law enforcement will no longer be tolerated and will be dealt with harshly. The United States Navy and Coast Guard will guard American coastal waters and deal with smugglers/illegal immigrants in a manner that exemplifies extreme prejudice. The guilt or innocence of [non-American and Jewish] violators will be determined by the vessels captain; no documentation of cases or their outcomes will be necessary. Congress in its entirety will receive a political enema, a general amnesty will be offered, those that choose to turn over evidence that reveals their treason will be pardoned, those that don’t and appear to be guilty will be shot. Some Congressmen should be publicly and summarily shot on the steps of the Capital building and their executions broadcast on television.

18. The vast majority of social welfare programs will end, churches will be encouraged to take over where they left off prior to Johnson’s “War on Poverty,” and all American organizations [religious included] will be discouraged from sending aid to Third World nations, this shouldn’t be a problem, because their aid will be desperately needed by their congregants. Religious organizations that continue to send aid to foreign countries will be exposed publicly, which will almost certainly bring condemnation from their congregants.

19. Unfortunately, as a result of the above measures the entire American economic system, as we know it today will collapse. In the beginning there will be tough times, privations and a modicum of hunger. If the American people work together, this period will not last longer than five years. The good news is that no non-Jews [criminals excluded] property will be confiscated as a result of defaulting on mortgages/loans, etc... Loans will be reviewed and payment deferred for an extended period of time [probably five years]. The confiscated assets of Jews will be used to bolster the newly formed economy, which will be of a mercantile type [managed]. Wealthy Americans like Bill Gates and the Oracle of Omaha will be encouraged to donate large sums of their fortune to this new economy , if they do they’ll be made into national heroes, if they don’t they may suffer from an accident and be scourged in the consciousness of the new America. Their wealth will be appropriated by the state. If feasible the new monetary system will be based upon precious metals.

20. Americans will be encouraged, rather than discouraged to breed. Parents with high IQs will be paid a substantial amount of money for reproducing. In some cases, low IQ individuals will be paid significant amounts of money to submit to sterilization. Women will once again have the opportunity to reassume their former exalted position in society – as mothers and marital partners. The necessity to maintain two income households will be done away with. The new media will no longer indoctrinate women to accept its so called concepts of equality – the new media will expose the lies of the old order and expose how a high divorce rate and abortion were slated to destroy western civilization. If women desire an abortion in the new world, let them go to a nation that insists on embracing degeneracy to get one. No apologies.

The most SHOCKING thing you'll probably ever read about the Jews...

2008-08-05T06:25:00.000-07:00

.

This is without doubt THE most thoroughly unpleasant and sickening essay I have EVER had to write. I've avoided this little-known aspect of Judaism for two main reasons: firstly that it's such a deeply disturbing subject that every decent person will be horrified by reading about it, and secondly that I've always maintained that these ultimate horrors of Judaism should be kept in reserve until AFTER the war has been won, for fear that ordinary people who read this will (in their blissful ignorance) find it utterly impossible to believe and conclude that this sickness is in OUR minds, and not in the minds of the perpetrators. It's a tough call to make this decision, but the truth will out sooner or later. The only caveats we should make for anyone contemplating reading what follows below is that they be mature adults over 21 years and NOT suffering from ANY kind of acute or chronic depressive or psychotic illness. YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED.

Regular readers of this blog will be well aware that Phaedrus has always railed against the phony concept of the so-called "Judeo-Christian tradition" for a number of perfectly valid reasons. For this stance, there have been (predictably) attacks against World Peace from the hot-headed delusionals within the Southern Baptist movement. These are the people that still hold to the 'literal truth' of the (Jew-scripted) Old Testament and dutifully believe every word of it - and are presumably therefore prepared to accept that they will therefore be the eternal slaves of the Jews. Strange, but true. Yes, these are the God-fearing folks you've seen with gnarled knuckles and knobbly fingers acquired from the practice of 'taking up serpents' and being stupid enough to believe God would protect them doing such a dumb-ass thing. These people claim to be Christians, yet they're strangely preoccupied with the welfare of Jesus' murderers, the Jews, and this tribe of vampires' mystical and biblical homeland, Israel.

Anyway, Phaedrus has been castigated in the recent past for writing essays that were supposedly too verbose (presumably by people who were keen to get back to watching American Idol or Fox News) so we shall attempt to keep this account as succinct as possible. Throughout history, gory depictions have been made by classical artists of Jews, represented as demonic entities, sucking the blood of innocent children before sacrificially slaughtering them in 'religious ceremonies' contrived to bring them (the Jews) great riches in this world by virtue of their primordial pact with the Devil. Jewish scholars and apologists have airily dismissed these representations out-of-hand as "classic Anti-Semitism" and there appeared - at first sight - to be no reason why they were not correct in this dismissal, because the acts represented in these depictions were so far-fetched to the healthy mind that they could scarcely, on the face of it, be conceived out of anything less than simple, resentful hatred towards Jews.

But the Truth is far, far uglier than a healthy mind can conceive and leads us to the inescapable conclusion that there is NO common ground whatsoever between Judaism and Christianity. What it DOES show is that there is EVERY indication that Judaism and Satanism are two names for the same belief system. Who among us has heard of the term, "Blood Libel"? Probably a fair percentage of those in the know, agreed. But do you REALLY understand what it means? The term implies a lie. Libel is a form of malicious falsehood, but what we're examining here in this essay is nothing but the horrifying TRUTH. You can describe it best as "high Judaism" (the expression in effect is directly equivalent to the Satanists' term, "high magick." So what actually happens in one of these ceremonies? We shall come to that in a moment, but please bear in mind (you can check this for yourself simply by reading much of the Old Testament) that a few thousand years ago, the Jews would make atonement for their sins by offering up a blood sacrifice to their God. This would be in the form of a live animal; "an unblemished beast and the finest of the field" as it is written. It would typically be a goat or a sheep and would have its guts slashed out over a blood-spattered alter and then burned, as a gesture of appeasement to the Jewish God (who, we are told, found the smell of burning flesh "pleasing" - it's in the Bible so go read it! It was important that the sacrifice be of the FINEST of the field and without blemish, for anything less than perfection was feared to be an insult to their God. In Judaism, there are various different rites of sacrificial offering, depending on the gravity of the religious law broken (and there are so MANY) or the favor sought.

In 'high Judaism', the principle was extended somewhat further with the periodic sacrificial slaughter of a HUMAN CHILD to enable the Tribe to enjoy great material riches and influence on earth. The noblest form of such sacrifice was determined by the Rabbis of that time to be a young, prepubescent male of around 11 years of age - again, the fairest and purest that could be found. The Talmud states that this child should be of Jewish parentage (since Heathens (non-Jews) were inferior and consequently of less sacrificial value) and prescribes the method of sacrifice, which we will have to examine shortly, unfortunately (the squeamish are advised to click "close" while they still can). Now at this point, Phaedrus feels obliged to point out (in order to preempt any accusations of pro-Jewish bias) that many historians report that Christian children were similarly dispatched by the Jews (if deemed beautiful and saintly enough) but though this may be true, World Peace has been unable to substantiate these reports (there's no reference to the sacrifice of Christian children in the Talmud) so they shall not be considered here. If anyone has any CREDIBLE AND VERIFIABLE sources that can show otherwise, of course, then please add your links to the comments section below.

The sacrifice itself:
The ritual killing of an innocent young child (he MUST be innocent or he's already violated and therefore worthless) shares its methodology equally between Judaism and Satanism alike and is carried out for exactly the same reasons: to gain power and wealth on the part of its observants in THIS world. In case anyone is foolhardy enough to reproduce this posting on an entry-level Jew-awareness site, we'll skate around some of the very "least pleasant" aspects of what follows below. Again, this is your FINAL chance to look away...

The child is stripped naked and fastened to a pillar above a tablet of salt. Those present then proceed to make a number of incisions into the child's arteries all around his body. The child will become extremely distressed at this point and his metabolic rate will go through the roof. Blood consequently flows freely. Then the 'priest' in charge of the ceremony will rub a caustic, burning substance into the child's flesh which triggers an out-rush of adrenaline and the body's natural painkillers, endorphines (powerful stimulants) from the child's endocrine system. These quickly manifest in the spurting blood and the assembled initiates then insert straws deep into the previously opened arteries and drink the 'charged blood' with its heady cocktail of supercharged, natural envigorants. Enervated by this sudden rush of power, the initiates then proceed to the climax of the ceremony, where the child's dying body is cast into the flame pit before the Jewish idol known as Moloch. His screams are drowned out according to historical record by the deafening chanting and beating of drums. The initiates, envigorated by the child's hormones, are then sufficiently enervated to perform the ritual magick that will - in their twisted belief system - make them powerful and wealthy beyond their wildest dreams. It really is nothing other than the continuance of a pact with the Devil and remarkably, for so many Jews over the centuries, it appears to have worked!

As stated above, the most bestial details of this 'ceremony' have been skipped over but the reader will have at least a half-complete picture by now of the procedure. And this vile practice continues to this very day, with babies purposely BRED for the purpose.

All too far-fetched for you? Perhaps you'd like to believe it is (what NORMAL person wouldn't?) but there are web resources that back this account up beyond question. First hand accounts of penitents who have witnessed these horrors and have determined to speak out about them over the only platform that can accommodate the unfettered truth: the Internet.

If you remain a disbeliever in the degree of Evil that our much-persecuted friends, the Jews, are capable of then may we suggest you do a little research of your own through your favorite search facility. Just try to avoid doing so before or after a large meal.

The Thoughts of Comrade Apollonian

2008-08-05T06:19:00.000-07:00

Whilst Apollonian's views don't chime in 100% with those of World Peace in general, an intelligent person who devotes so much considered criticism deserves a better platform than simply being stuck in the "comments" section. So here are Apollonian's observations on recent postings to this blog...

"War Crimes" Prop.--Just More Balderdash By Jew Money Power, That's All
(Apollonian, 31 Jul 08)

Indeed good comrade Phaedrus, consider basic logic of idiotic "Int. War Crimes Tribunal"--who then are only people POWERFUL enough to possibly, conceivably make such pretentious operation work?

Say I, supreme commander of forces of Apollonia, exterminate scads of folks in land of enemy Dionysia, and we manage to "win" the war, God-willing. So who's going to "arrest" me?--it could only be some stronger, enemy power, and who would that be?

For why would any of my own people do such dumb, traitorous thing? The other side lost (presumably), so they can't do anything, can they? For when/if u "win," it means no one can mess with u, right?

And after all, I only did the necessarily vicious, ruthless things one has to do in war, slaughtering and killing much as possible, creating most damage, mayhem, and pain against scum who (presumably) attacked.

Who ever hrd of a "fair war"? Thus people are rightly taught not to go to war except as very LAST RESORT, this in absolute defense. I only slaughtered and exterminated as it was only thing to do--as the enemy refused to listen to reason and attacked. Enemy must have known I'd fight my hardest--it's only way to fight war, etc.

And say some power did seek my arrest--who are they then but simply ally of Dionysia? And so all it means then is the war continues, this now by ally of Dionysia.

Thus the entire premise for such "War Crimes Tribunal" is shown to be so brainlessly, completely absurd.

And ur analysis is well borne out: the only possible "prosecutors" of Karadzic is same Jew money power, as u pt. out, that's all. And this idiot "prosecution" is simply continuation of war against, extortion of Serbs, indubitably--what else?

And all this "war crimes" bullshit is purest propaganda and crap, that's all, meant for morons, only people stupid enough to go for it.

Hence then observe what REALLY is going on: Imperialist war against anyone and whoever is weak enough--AND WHAT'S "JUSTIFICATION" we're fed?--the same idiotic MORALISM-Pharisaism as always given by scummy Jew money-power w. their effete lies meant for queers. Hey, so ZOG-Mammon is on the side of "good" and anti-antisemitism, as always.

And hence do u notice something?--"good" and anti-antisemitism ARE ALWAYS LINKED--they're the same thing. Only Jews are good--Only Jews are God--get it?

Hence then we make the biggest mistake when we get diverted/distracted upon idiot "war crimes," etc., and take our eye off the real FRAUD that's taking place: the emplacement of Jews as arbiters, as judges, as the only real power, now evermore so invincible and un-questionable. After all, u don't want to be against "justice" do u? U don't want to be in favor of "war criminals" do u?--ALL ALWAYS IN THE NAME OF MORALISM-Pharisaism, "good-evil," etc.

And when one stops to think and just look--who and what are these scummy Judeo-conspirators (see TheNewAmerican.com for expo/ref. on CFR-Bilderberg conspiracy)?--they're just a bunch of stinking COUNTERFEITERS, in essence, that's all--see RealityZone.com for expo/ref. on US Federal Reserve Bank (Fed) fraud.

So good comrade Phaedrus, my conclusion is it ("war crimes tribunal") is indeed "sick joke," exactly as u say--FOUNDED THEN UPON THE SAME "GOOD-EVIL" fallacy/delusion/heresy (Pelagianism/Pharisaism) I've been warning u about.

CONCLUSION; For only liars and frauds seriously push this "good-evil" balderdash which is utterly without criterion or verifiable meaning, something totally subjective and ultimately meaningless--lies and murder all meant to back-up and prop that basic little scam of theirs, COUNTERFEIT conspiracy. Honest elections and death to the Fed. Apollonian

Weaklings Must Continue to Die-Off Before Revolutionary Success
(Apollonian, 2 Aug 08)

Comrade Phaedrus, I do follow ur excellent expo and account of facts and details so far as it goes, but I think some HONEST notation needs be made regarding (a) exactly, precisely what's really taking place, and (b) causation thereto. Jews deserve much blame, to be sure, but they're not only ones.

For indeed a huge, putrid, miserable fraud is taking place, no doubt about it. And Jews are indubitably topmost benefactors. But the fraud is much being done by poor, brainless dipshit victims themselves, after all. No, it's no excuse for filthy, scummy Jews, and they will be deservedly EXPELLED, surely, but the fraud, nonetheless, is much by morons who became over-populated in Spenglerian "Decline of the West," thus creating "a (proverbial) situation," after all is said and done.

For note Jews fulfill a distinct socio-biologic (see KevinMacDonald.net) function, Jews a necessary parasitic disease-of-opportunity which effectively eliminates over-populated weaklings and inferiors fm gentile race--who just go too far in fooling themselves, and who let the Jews into their fatal, poisonous positions in first place.

Jews aren't "evil"--anymore than Typhus disease is "evil."

For at the root of it, note "central banking" is simply one thing: COUNTERFEITING (see RealityZone.com for expo/ref.), quite literally, pure and simple, no ifs, ands, or buts. And the stupid fools of the people very much brought it on themselves--yes, with the willing and gleeful complicity of Jews. And Jews must and will pay, but it's important not to overlook responsibility of people themselves.

And that's FUNDAMENTAL problem of human existence, archetypal question put for all time in New Testament (NT) Gosp. JOHN, through the character of Pontius Pilate: "What is truth?"

Thus stupid people too often imagine they can just VOTE truth and/or reality into being by means of their idiot wishful thinking. And yes, Jews are right there, egging them (the people) on, indubitably.

So what then needs to happen?--simple: COUNTERFEIT fraud needs to be REMOVED decisively, debt-relief instituted, Jew profiteers absolutely CONFISCATED, interned, etc. But of course, this Jew-expulsion/confiscation isn't going to happen too easily, but only by means of tortuous warfare, etc., and that's why we're having now to endure and contend w. police state as u indicate.

So we need to understand what the cultural solution is going to take: (a) people need to heed inductive logic for problem ("it's Jews, stupid"--see ConspiracyPenPal.com, "It Wasn't Arabs," Nov 03 archives), and act accordingly--this then will entail mainly top-level leadership, a small fraction of the volk.

(b) The other, parallel avenue will require great CHRISTIAN AWAKENING to effect of proper Christian anti-semitism--for anti-semitism (anti-Talmud as Gosp. MARK 7:1-13) is very purpose of Christianity, after all--which most people (and "Christians") need to re-learn.

Meantime note, historically, we observe many, many inferiors and weaklings MUST FIRST die-out before remnant survivors are enabled to face stark facts and anti-semitic necessities, and that it's no longer expedient to be "mighty-white," "generous" and "big-hearted" so as to continue entertaining this Jew disease out of "charity" and especially, moralism-Pharisaism, especially anti-antisemitism.

Rather people must be forthright and honest and proceed to decisive Jew-expulsion.

Get it?--inferiors and weaklings need to face stark facts: THERE IS NO "GOOD-EVIL." There's just truth and honesty--and nothing against these (truth and honesty)can be tolerated. Only then, after such child's "good-evil" Pelagianism and hereticalism is eliminated fm people's mentality will they be able to successfully resist and counter-act Jew-disease.

So it would seem we're still a good ways off fm serious chance/opportunity for successful anti-semitic REVOLUTION (much like French Rev. of 1789).

CONCLUSION: Thus as we continue to suffer, and weaklings die-off, meantime we must preach and teach the people who remain by that two-fold, parallel method, (a) rationalist induction and (b) honest Christianity, hence anti-semitism. Moralism-Pharisaism and Pelagian heresy must be defeated by means of HONESTY and most ruthless, merciless REASON. Honest elections and death to the Fed. Apollonian

British Authorities Expecting Trouble? Part 2.

2008-08-02T08:07:00.000-07:00

.
Yes, they´re expecting trouble alright. A lot of it. And here´s why...
Over 25 years ago, a policy of fiddling with the official inflation figures began. The result now, that is becoming more and more obvious to more and more people (even the perceptively-challenged) is that massive numbers of people are facing the coming winter in freezing cold houses with little to eat. That ought to be enough to start a riot in just about ANY country.

The fact is that the official UK inflation rate is MASSIVELY understated and has been for very many years. Only lately is the absurdity of the official rate attracting the scrutiny of the ordinary peasant on the street, however. Even the most willfully ignorant have woken up to the fact that their currency vouchers are buying less and less. The official headline rate of inflation in the UK at present is in the region of about 3.5%. In reality, the true figure is something closer to 32% - higher than at any time (eclipsing even the previous peek set 32 years ago under the then Labor government of Harold Wilson (Wilson's finance minister at that time was a guy called Dennis Healey (a long-standing member of the scheming Bilderberg Group).

How can this current situation have arisen? It will not surprise regular readers here to learn that those ultimately responsible are the Jews. Once upon a time, the British government adopted an entirely transparent mechanism for monitoring price rises. It was (and technically still is) based on the cost of a 'basket of goods.' Originally, this notional shopping basket held items such as a loaf of bread, a pound of tea, a gallon of heating oil, a joint of beef, a pint of beer and so on. Basic necessities, in essence. Its price was calculated from the average costs of these items in different places in the UK. The resulting inflation figure was pretty accurate, being rooted in what people HAD to have at a basic level.

The official inflation rate is a critically important measure. It was and still is always desirable (for a government) to UNDERstate it. Why? Because it helps to foster faith in the currency and the economy, but also, and crucially, it is the benchmark figure for wage claims. Claims for wage rises (particularly in the public sector) above the rate of inflation are heavily deprecated as they fuel future inflation and can lead to a wage-price spiral (as was the case in Britain in the 1970s). By publishing a misleadingly low official rate of inflation, governments can save BILLIONS every year in public spending by getting the Ingorati to accept pay rises that are in reality, BELOW inflation. Year on year, this effect accumulates until finally it becomes glaringly obvious to all.

That is the situation Britain faces today. The British government has CONNED millions of people from the middle classes downwards, including all its state pensioners, into living on less and less and less as the years go by. All by manipulating the official inflation rate. How was this achieved? It was fiendishly simple. Successive governments have meddled with the contents of the notional 'basket of goods' by gradually replacing certain items with others on the pretext of 'keeping the system current.' Keeping the system up to date is, if done honestly and transparently, no bad thing. But it has not been done this way. The composition of this basket is now changed EVERY year and the staple items that people NEED to SURVIVE have been steadily replaced by junk items that typically devalue quite rapidly: computers and their accessories, widescreen TVs, mobile phones and other hi-tech items that can be explained as forming a significant part of people's outlay.

Things have now reached such a degree of absurdity that the Bank of England now uses a measure called 'core CPI' which totally strips out the cost of food and fuel! The excuse given was that these components were "too volatile" to continue to be included. Well,how remarkably convenient in a country where the cost of a loaf of bread has doubled in the last 6 months! Not only, food, but gas, electricity and water charges in the UK continue to rise HUGELY by an average (over the last few years) of some 50% year-on-year! Yet the peasants are still urged to curb wage demands to below 'the level of inflation' – meaning below 3.5% as opposed to what it is in truth: almost 10 times that figure.

Well, you can keep up such a pretense for just so long before the strains start to show, and boy are they showing in Britain right now! Whilst it would be desirable and refreshing to see the status quo in Britain overturned as a result of the people's waking up to the fact that their country has been taken over by Jews, it's still almost as invigorating to see how the TeeVee loving sans-culottes of lower Britain are being driven to the point of realization through self-deserved cold and starvation. Maybe the first will come in the trail of the second; we can but hope the people of this once-great country will see behind the smokescreens of the media/government lies and identify the REAL culprits and architects of their demise: the Jews.

The International War Crimes Tribunal: a Sick Joke

2008-07-31T06:50:00.000-07:00

.
There is no ostensible reason why war criminals who have engaged in mass murder and seriously breaking other stipulations of the Geneva Convention should not be brought to book, even if the offenses allegedly committed were half-a-century or more ago. The 20th century has known its fair share of infamous despots who should rightly have their foul deeds exposed for the world to see and consequently suffer an apposite punishment for their terrible crimes. I doubt very few of us inside or outside of the Truth Movement would raise any serious objections to that.

But it's deeply worrying that those so far captured and brought before this process appear very strongly to be SELECTED according to two main criteria:

a) Who they are, in whose interests they were serving, and

b) Who their victims were.

We are constantly assured that everything is being done to ensure no war criminal, wherever they may be, ever escapes Justice and indeed, from time-to-time, some minor demagogue is captured, hauled before the Tribunal and given a show-trial in front of the blazing lights of the world's media. It's all very re-assuring to know that finally, there's a 'new sheriff in town' that won't let a case rest until the perpetrators are captured and see due process before a competent authority, with all the evidence on the table, out in the open, for all to see.

But since the ICC has been up and running, it has become increasingly apparent that some of the world's WORST war criminals are not even on its 'wanted list'. These prosecutions appear not only politically-motivated, but also highly SELECTIVE in respect of those they hunt down and indict. This essay has been prompted by the arrest and arraignment of the Yugoslavian leader, Dr. Radovan Karadzic, who has been whisked to the Hague at lightning speed to answer for his alleged 'crimes' - which were basically just his attempts to prevent his Christian country from being over-run by militant Muslims and Gypsies.

The Bosnian Serbs (who were painted as the 'bad guys' during the 1990s civil war) view Dr. Karadzic, not surprisingly, as their hero - just as we would anyone who took a strong stand against mass immigration of undesirables in our own country. Sadly Karadzic's noble cause to clean up his country was unacceptable to the Marxists in the New World Order who smeared him with all sorts of unpleasant epithets,simply for his pro-nationalist stance. He refused accept 'multiculturalism being forced upon his beloved country and took a robust stand against it. To the henchmen of the NWO, this was enough to set a fuse to a train of events which has seen Karadzic placed in a cell in Holland to await his eventual fate.

Now whether or not we are sympathetic to Karadzic and the Nationalist movement in Serbia (Phaedrus naturally IS, of course) it is becoming increasingly obvious that the remit of this Court only seems to go as far as pursuing those prosecutions deemed desirable by International Jewry and its network of gentile collaborators in Holland and the UN. Which ever way you look at it, Karadzic is a very small fish. He is but a minnow in a sea of far more evil and destructive persons who are unlikely EVER to be brought before the Court to answer the FAR more serious charges outstanding against THEM. And the longer this kangaroo court is permitted to operate, the more glaring these disparities in the nature of its chosen defendants becomes.

Here are just a FEW, REAL, MURDEROUS tyrants for you to contemplate:

George W. Bush
Dick Cheney
Tony Blair
Gordon Brown
Ehud Olmurt
Henry Kissinger
Ariel Sharon
Paul Wolfowitz
Richard Perl
Donald Rumsfeld

Just to cite a MERE HANDFUL of rodents who between them have slaughtered MILLIONS of innocent men, women and children. What interest have the Hague's prosecutors shown in THEM? None whatsoever! How curious. Israel is the most despicable 'country' in the world when its political and religiously-motivated murders are expressed in terms of its tiny population. China is scarcely better. Where are the Chinese right now? "Most Favored Nation" for international trade, according to the US state department! And they've had the Olympics handed to them on a plate! Kissinger, who indulged in unspeakable barbarity whilst operating in South America during the 1960s. No sign of that Satan-worshiping monster, either. In fact the Jewish-controlled Nobel Committee even awarded the sick son-of-a bitch one of their Peace Prizes one year! That's Jewish humor for you, I guess.

Will there EVER come a time when these vile, sub-human vermin are dragged to Holland to have their untold crimes exposed before the world to see? I wouldn't bet on it. The International Criminal Court is just yet another arm of the United Nations, which controls it - and more importantly, WHO is on the wanted list for trial there. It shouldn't come as a surprise to any of us any more. Karadzic- a proud patriot beloved by his people - today commences his years rotting away in some dingy cell in Holland whilst awaiting a trial that may well outlive its defendant, just as the last one did for Karadzic's fellow patriot: Slobodan Milosovic, who died from the stress of the process before the court could reach any verdict.

We are not seeing even-handedness in the choice of quarry this Tribunal SHOULD be going after. From behind this monitor, Phaedrus perceives BLATANT BIAS and undue FAVOR taking place which will continue to grow ever more obvious to more and more people for as long as this wretched series of show-trials continues. WHO THE HELL DO THESE CROOKS THINK THEY'RE KIDDING? We're not stupid! Many of us can see with perfect clarity exactly what's going on. AND IT STINKS!!!

A tale of two lies

2008-07-31T06:48:00.000-07:00

No idea who the author of this great piece is, sourced from NFTW:

The Holocaust and 9/11

23/6/2008

This essay is dedicated to the many wonderful Jewish people I have known and loved, most of whom were nicer people than me. I thank you for your love and kindness, and it is with a heavy heart I must apprise you of the result of my lengthy and fair-minded studies.

When I look at Jews, I think of evil alien predators, conscienceless murderers: Israelis who harvest body parts of the Arab children they kill, twisted rabbis who suck the blood from babies' penises, and then are forgiven by Jewish judges, and demonic American politicians like the Jewish terrorist Joe Lieberman and his Hanoi Hilton-brained puppet McCain who are about to take the world into a maelstrom of radioactive fire.

All Jews are part of a system that has captured the world's mind in such a clever and thorough way that virtually no one who has not studied world history for decades even suspects something odd has happened. To this very moment the heinous acts of the Jewish moneykings are constantly and perpetually shattering the peace and tranquility we yearn for, and yet their hold on public consciousness has wiped out the higher values that we were all supposed to hold dear. Ultimately, we choose not to see what they're doing because we’re terrified of jeopardizing our own money supply, and hence our survival.

When I look at Gentiles, who are all the non-Jews of the world, I see an endless sea of dupes of Jewish propaganda. Gentiles mostly have no clue about any of this. They have happily consumed the products tossed their way, almost never realizing that what they have been gifted has been crafted for a purpose, and given to them by Jews. You may yourself conclude what that purpose may be, but one need only look at the hyperbolic curve of moral decay and corruption that overtook world society in the first decade of the 21st century.

Throughout the 20th century and to a lesser extent long before, Jewish control of the media has reshaped the human mind. (See my Freud, Marx and Einstein: a matrix of nihilistic destabilization.

From the Gay 1890s, which masked a major immigration of German and Russian Jews to the U.S., through the takeover of all American corporations and ultimately all the banks (Dupont, Monsanto, Time Warner and Eli Lilly are all Jewish companies). The Rockefellers are Marrano Jews who control all the universities. Every particle of information you have ingested in your entire lifetime has been screened by Jews.

The result of all this, throughout American history, has been constant warfare based on lies for profit. George Washington went to notorious Jewish slave trader Aaron Lopez to help fund his revolution. Our Founding Fathers were the Bilderbergers of their day. Rothschild funded both sides of the American Revolution and has done so with every major war down to this very day.

It is written in the Bible, of course, but also in the frightened words of Cicero and Tacitus, the great Roman historians, who feared to speak for fear of the Jews, indicating that the string-pulling power of the Jews was every bit as powerful in ancient Rome as it is today in Washington.

And the world marches blithely on, in a fluoride coma that blots out the screams.

•••

Germany, Russia and the United States have been the countries, over history, who have acted most kindly toward Jews. They gave them their opportunity to fit in. As a result, these nations have been utterly ravaged by Jews. The Germans through media lies became the pariahs of the world. And the Russians were mostly murdered by foreign Jews who took over their country. The United States has been turned into a Jewish monster that condones torture, which we have learned from how the Israelis torture the Palestinians. No rights. The choices are you can be corpse or a slave.

Identification of two principal lies are what the world faces if it is to evolve toward a genuine, self-actualizing future.

The first is the Holocaust, the claimed deliberate mass murder of six million Jews by Adolf Hitler and the Germans.

The second is 9/11, the destruction of the twin towers in New York City by supposedly neophyte pilot Arab terrorists.

Both are lies, believed by the masses only because of the media blitz that inculcated their fictional credibility in the public mind.

The same effect was achieved with Holocaust propaganda, which began in earnest only after the first Kennedy assassination.

The same media blitz in the late 1960s that first imbued the notion of a Jewish holocaust in Germany 1940-45 — with specific notions of gassings, pools of fire, and human soap — made acceptance of this falsified version of history the publicly accepted norm, thanks to the constant bombardment of Jewish media, and the mawkish construction of Holocaust museums throughout the world to venerate Jewish suffering. We are told, in many countries by law, to worship Jewish suffering.

How this relates to what Israel does to its neighbors is nothing more than the stories told of Jews throughout the centuries. All of their holidays celebrate slaughter, and world history has shown the kingmakers, powerbrokers, and money launderers, all of whom seem to be Jewish or their lackeys, seem to really like shedding blood on those particular days.

One thing is for sure: they are Chosen to test the rest of us.

•••

The claim that six million died in World War II is actually an echo of a story that was first seen in the New York Times in the 1920s claiming six million Jews were at risk of death in Europe. This was the fever pitch of Jewish immigration from Russia and Eastern Europe that followed pogroms they staged themselves to gain sympathy, a tactic they have always used back to Roman days.

All those emaciated bodies you see in the World War II film clips were actually caused by starvation and typhus after Allied bombings cut off the German supply lines. The gassing story really derives from its invention and use in the Russian gulags by yet another Jewish madman. The Germans didn’t gas anyone; they only tried to get their country out of the international Jewish financial crime scheme that was and is choking the life out of the planet.

Now hundreds of honest people are in jail for insisting this is the historical truth, yet they are not allowed to present their evidence to the world court of public opinion because of the deafening white noise of Jewish media, always ready to shape the public the way they want us to go, and the corrupt Jewish courts, which in Germany have reached laughably sad abuse of logic and honesty, subhuman, really, decisions controlled by Jews.

The parable of Elie Wiesel is perhaps the easiest way to debunk the Holocaust in your mind. The claims he made in his Nobel Prize-winning book Night now all stand thoroughly revealed as hysterical fiction. Yet, thanks to Jewish media, the world marches on, still mostly believing everything he said was true.

Similar enforced epiphanies were blasted into the public mind on 9/11: the government published the names of all 19 hijackers in three hours, and yet, eight years later, it has told us nothing more about the actual crime, and managed to murder several million hijab-clad unfortunates while doing so. Do we need to take this description of an utterly and criminally insane society that we in our comas support by our silent complicity ... any further?

The very fabric of American society has been completely changed by arbitary and despotic new laws as a result of this colossal act of staged terror. The hysterical measures implemented by the government after it covered up a proper investigation of 9/11 all have the tendency to funnel acceptable thoughts toward what the government decrees. And when the government is lying, and not telling you what’s really going on, you are not free. Do not deceive yourself. Sometime soon, ask yourself, where am I being taken? And you will perceive the sinister presence of the Jew hiding behind whatever ailment is about to enslave or destroy you.

Rabbi Michael Chertoff, the one man in America who has ultimate control over whether you have committed a crime or not, is an Israeli citizen, a veteran of the Mossad, and key operative among the Israeli agents who have controlled the administrative staffs of all recent U.S. presidents. As head of Homeland Security, and now that the judiciary has ceased functioning as a legitimate branch of government, Chertoff has the final decision over whether you live or die, and he will make his decisions according to new rules decreed by President Bush II which have removed most of our previous Constitutional protections.

Michael Chertoff is controlled by Israel. The United States is controlled by Israel. Failure to deal with the question is going to cost many of us our lives in the very near future. It is written in the Jewish scriptures.

Amy Goodman, darling of the Jewish-controlled gatekeeper left, and who never would mention 9/11 until years after the event, is a Jew.

Judith Miller, the reporter from the New York Times who made up all those stories of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq that the U.S. GOVERNMENT THEN USED AS EVIDENCE, is a Jew.

"The Jew is to say on Purim Day: ... cursed be all non-Jews, blessed be all Jews." (Orach Chaim, 660, 16).

"Theft, robbery and rape of a beautiful woman and similar deeds are forbidden to every Gentile toward another Gentile and also toward a Jew. But they are allowed to a Jew against a non-Jew." (Sanhedrin, 57 a; also Abodah Zara, 13b).

"A heretic Gentile you may kill outright with your own hands." (Aboda Zara 4b).

“The difference between a Jewish soul and the souls of non-Jews—all of them in all different levels—is greater and deeper than the difference between a human soul and the souls of cattle.” — Rabbi Kook the Elder, revered father of the messianic tendency in Jewish fundamentalism

All these words and thoughts are not anti-Semitic (a term that is a misnomer anyway, meant to scare people from looking at crimes being committed in their names). They are simply evidence of an enormous crime scheme against the entire human species, and concealed from the consciousness of most people by an educational system deliberately designed to hide the fact that people are not free when they are not told the truth about what is really going on.

We all yearn for an honest and just world. Our leaders clearly work to prevent that, because of the financial pressures placed upon them by the people who really run the world, who in our case just happen to be Jewish bankers and a worldwide organization of wealth that has been robbing the world for the last 200 years. It’s past time to figure out how to detox the poison they spew before the last lifeform on Earth is blotted out.

Jews must be disenfranchised as normal human beings. Since their toxic dogma demands they regard themselves as a step above the rest of the species, as evidenced by their complete takeover of modern society, we must regard them as a step below real human beings, who simply realize that love is the answer and you don’t have to kill someone to get it.

British Authorities Expecting Trouble? Part 1.

2008-07-30T05:58:00.000-07:00

.
During a speech earlier this month in the north of England, noted conspiracy theorist, David Icke, revealed some curious intelligence that had been imparted to him by one of his adherents: a lowly traffic warden. Now in Britain, a "traffic warden" is a minor public official that goes around handing out parking tickets to drivers who've parked in prohibited places, or whose parking permission slips have expired. Needless to say, these people are not among the most popular public officials in the country, especially given the ordeal that most drivers endure when trying to park ANYWHERE in Britain's overcrowded cities.

Traffic wardens are almost universally loathed by the British public. They are frequently sworn at, spat upon and often physically assaulted by angry motorists. In some areas, things have got so bad that they are required to wear body armor in the event they might be stabbed or shot(which is not an uncommon occurrence, it seems.) So, tough job, but someone's got to do it, I guess. And the stolid, robotic mindset that is so typical of these drones marks them out as ideally-suited to the task. They're invariably rigid and unbending in applying the rules, regardless of the urgency of the situation they're dealing with. We're talking people with very little brain and even less compassion.

But there is always the odd exception to this stereotype, and Icke was able elicit some disturbing information from one of them who (luckily) happens to be a follower of his. This warden was somewhat surprised one day when his (formerly) very restricted powers were (completely out of the blue) given something of a make-over. He produced to Icke some additional cards he'd been sent by the government department that controls these drudges. The cards conferred upon him greatly enhanced powers that had previously not been available to a person of such a menial station in life.

To cut a long story short, British traffic wardens have recently been granted the power of arrest and powers of entry into private property for the purposes of carrying out searches. Our warden was immediately suspicious! What on earth would HE of all people (at the bottom-most rung of parking enforcement) need such additional powers for? Our hero whistle-blower turned to a serving police officer with whom he had become close and asked him what he made of this sudden change in his circumstances. The copper at once became rather apprehensive. He drew the curious warden aside and confided in him, on the condition that he breathed not a whisper concerning what he was about to be told.

Fortunately for Decency, this warden put his country and common sense before any blind loyalty to that Fascist state. It sometimes happens in this fashion that we get little glimpses into the way things are run behind the scenes in our Western countries. The police officer guardedly confided in our informant that the authorities were expecting "trouble" in the near future that would necessitate he (the cop) and his colleagues being tide-up full-time in other areas of the country in dealing with rioting and crowd control. The traffic wardens were being effectively 'deputized' as stand-in police officers with enhanced powers to fill the role of uniformed police whilst they were elsewhere engaged at the sharp end - cracking the skulls of an exasperated British public.

Icke confirms he has physically inspected the cards that were issued to that warden and has no reason whatsoever to doubt the person's word. If this intelligence is true, it gives rise to the obvious question: what sort of trouble and from what grievance (or grievances) are the authorities anticipating the long-suffering British public might revolt over? In the immediate future (which these measures one assumes are most likely to have been introduced to deal with) there can only be a few possible scenarios. The most likely ones, in Phaedrus' view, are the soaring cost of food and energy, and the likelihood of shortages of both - even staple necessities like bread, sugar, cereals, and (of course) fuel for heating and transport.

We shall be looking a little more closely at these various possibilities and how they've arisen in Part 2 of this item, which we'll publish here on World Peace shortly.

The Salami Principle: How People Accept the Unacceptable

2008-07-25T10:59:00.000-07:00

.
Imagine, if you will, an average American or European citizen from 1950, sent forwards through time to the present day. As the door of his time-capsule swings open and he steps tentatively outside to appraise this Brave New World in which we currently live, what do you imagine his reaction might be? Phaedrus ventures to propose that it would be nothing short of horrified disbelief. We might picture it for ourselves as going to sleep one night and waking up the next morning to find ourselves in some God-forsaken, dysfunctional menagerie populated by all manner of bizarre and terrifying entities which are carrying out the most unspeakably wicked acts towards one-another as the rational mind can conceive. Our time-traveler's senses are overcome to the point of swooning by the thick, unmistakable, acrid stench of pure Evil. How could mankind have descended to this level? It defies all reason.

Yet as this voyager in time continues to look on aghast, he sees people broadly similar to himself in everything other than the clothes they wear, who seem to a great extent unaware of the maelstrom of madness going on all around them. They continue to go about their activities largely impervious to their environment. Occasionally our visitor is mortified to see one of the modern humans brutally slain by a deranged predator right before his eyes, yet even more revolted by the realization that whenever this happens, the other humans, though fleetingly fearful, quickly appear to resume their normal activities - rather TOO quickly, in fact. As the soundtrack backdrop to all this insanity, there is the constant "thump, thump, thump" of some kind of bass percussion instrument which is almost deafening. Modern man, however, appears not to notice it. To engage in the most basic conversation, he has to shout directly into the ear of his interlocutor, but seems to bear this burden without complaint.

Stunned by his nightmare vision of the future, the venturer gathers enough wits together to make a dash for his time-capsule. He fears for his life momentarily as he fumbles with the controls, but seconds later, with IMMENSE relief, he finds himself back in the familiar, ordered society of 1950. Had it all just been a bad dream? Surely no one could REALLY live in a future world like that. It was SO bad, SO dysfunctional that decent people - the majority - would NEVER permit such a sick society to arise. Yes, that must be it. It was just a terrible vision and nothing more. What on earth could have given him such a bad dream? Ah, it must have come about through his reading George Orwell's Nineteen-Eighty-Four two years earlier. Yeah, that must be it. Powerful works of fiction have a way of perturbing our subconscious in ways that can surface quite a while later. Phew! What a relief!

Sadly, the test of time proves to us today, beyond any shadow of a doubt, that this nightmare vision of the future was no figment of the human imagination. Our hypothetical time-traveler from 1950 only made a fleeting visit to 2008, he only saw a tiny FRACTION of what now goes on on a daily basis, yet it was enough to convince him that the world had gone mad. To the mind of the average, decent citizen of 1950, the way we 'live' today is like something out of a badly-made horror movie. The citizens of 1950 would NEVER suffer a future to develop like the one that nevertheless, has. The society we see around us today would be totally UNACCEPTABLE to the average person of 58 years ago. The obvious question, then, given the foregoing reasonable assumptions, is HOW the HECK did we get into this state? How could it POSSIBLY HAPPEN?

The intervening years since reasonable sanity once prevailed, have been driven by a specific Agenda. It is an Agenda that no decent person could possibly sign up to. Nonetheless, the forces that conceived of it drove it through and they were able to do this by making use of something known as the 'Salami Principle.' Now a Salami is a long sausage; sometimes VERY long. In one piece it is pretty much indigestible, so the powers that be, that envisioned our post-war future for us, decided that the only way to make us swallow it would be to slice it up and feed it to us over very many years; a little piece at a time. Now this hypothetical salami isn't a palatable sausage at all. Even small slices of it don't taste very nice. But they're manageable - just. If we're spoon fed thin slices at odd intervals, preferably whilst our attention is distracted (like folks do when they're feeding a baby sometimes) then it's not such an ordeal. We can just about stomach a slice at a time, whereas the whole sausage in one sitting would be a complete no-no.

The makers of this poison salami have chosen the thickness of its slices well. Only a morsel of the sausage must we endure each time, stopping short JUST before we throw-up. In the year 2008, we are forcing down the final few slices of this complete, toxic sausage. Phaedrus is a great believer in metaphors, so presumably by now it will be clear what this salami consists of. Our time traveler saw it almost in its entirety. What was the first slice? Probably the creation of the United Nations. Seemed like a good idea at the time to peace-loving people everywhere, didn't it? No more wars, they told us! And many, many, many similar slices have followed since; each subtly chipping away at our culture, heritage and freedom. They have become too numerous to itemize. But some you may be aware of include the following:-

The founding of the Bilderberg Group, the Council on Foreign Relations, the Trilateral Commission, NAFTA (North American Union in waiting), GATT (now the WTO), the World Bank, the IMF, the European Union (started off as a small trading arrangement between a handful of independent countries over 50 years ago and now a federal empire of some 27, centrally-governed sub-states like Germany, the UK, Italy and France). In 1948, we saw the founding of Israel - the most ruinously expensive, murderous, parasite pseudo-state in all history. Also along the way have been constant attacks on our nationhood and sense of self: so-called 'equality' laws arising out of the civil rights movement which have festered out of all proportion to become a cudgel to subjugate European Americans with. The 'permissive society' in the 1960s. Sex, drugs and Rock n Roll. Punk Rock, Hip-Hop, Gangsta Rap. The promotion of homosexuality and transgenderism. The purposeful destruction of the family unit. The robbery of taxpayers; funneling our hard-earned cash into the pockets of Negroes in Africa and Jews in Israel on the pretext of 'aid' or 'security concerns.' One could go on and on and on...

If all this had been foisted on us in one hit, the people of America and Europe would NEVER have stood for it. There would have been Bloody Revolution throughout the western world. The powers that be (mainly Jews) therefore fed it to us little by little; JUST enough at a time for the bulk of us not to be SO angry that we'd actually DO anything about it each time we were fed another slice. We collectively screwed up our faces, closed our eyes and swallowed. Then we morosely got back on with struggling to pay the bills and keep a roof over our heads. It's been a long-term, on-going, insidious process carefully calculated to be JUST within the limits of our tolerance at each step. Last week saw warrant-less wire-tapping and e-mail snooping voted in by Congress. We grumble, make our excuses and get on with what remains of our lives. Next up? Micro-chipping for the masses. They'll bring it in, once again, little by little. First, they'll start with our kids. "It'll protect them," they'll say, "Why should your kids be denied the kind of protection that we routinely give to dogs? Don't they deserve better protection than mere animals already enjoy?" Later on it'll be extended to criminals on parole, then anyone with a record - and finally, every last one of us. Same goes for the planned DNA database.

Anyone with half a brain can see where all this is leading and HAS BEEN leading now for many decades. Our REAL enemies aren't so-called "terrorists" in far-flung lands; they're the Jews in Washington DC, their gentile, sell-out cronies, and their counterparts in Europe. The situation as it stands today is UNACCEPTABLE. It is as UNACCEPTABLE today as it would have been to the good citizens of 1950. The fact that that the UNACCEPTABLE has accrued over a long period instead of in one, ugly great dollop counts for nothing. It is no less UNACCEPTABLE for that. Not one iota We have now reached where we were headed all along and thanks to the Internet (alone, largely) increasing numbers of ordinary Joes are waking up to the fact. That is the one, bright shining ray of hope on the horizon for us. The poisoners and traitors that have delivered us into the nightmare of early 21st century life will shortly be exposed before the entire world and dealt with in the appropriate manner. I truly believe that. I can SEE it, in fact, in our very near future. And it ain't going to be a pretty sight. A lot of good men will die in wiping out this Evil. That is the price we must pay for not minding Jefferson's vital warning: "The price of freedom is eternal vigilance."

I was really beginning to HATE the Negro, but then...

2008-07-21T06:12:00.000-07:00

.
Looking at the TeeVee these days, it's hard not to notice the astonishing prominence given to Negroes within today's so-called 'popular culture.' Not just television,but the movies, newspapers and teenage magazines. There seems no getting away from talentless black people in modern society.

Wherever you look, they're on the tube, the screen, or in the entertainment pages, proudly swinging their dicks to some God-awful noise they've conjured up with the aid of Western technology, usually in company with some brainless, white, race-traitor whores cavorting shamelessly alongside of them just for good measure.

Like you, no doubt, Phaedrus is disgusted at the antics of these primates. It's natural to seethe with anger when you see them making such outrageous public displays of themselves; screaming "Muthafucka" and the virtues of pimping, whoring, crack-smoking and robbery into the delicate, innocent ears of your potentially susceptible 11 year-old daughter.

But the question we must ask ourselves is: WHO put them there? WHO gave them this platform from which to defecate on mainstream, decent society? There's no way they could achieve it alone! The persons responsible, as always, are the Jews. The Jews own and/or control 96% of the Western media, so the Negro, who would otherwise only be capable of reaching the ears of a wider audience by banging on his jungle drums, owes his recently-found infamy and fortune to the Jew.

The obvious question that then arises within inquiring minds is WHY? WHY have these ugly, boot-lipped savages been granted such favor when all they use this valuable privilege for is to take a HUGE SHIT on the rest of us? The answer shouldn't really be a surprise. The Negro is the perfect tool for the Jews to use to undermine ordered society - a burning and long-standing desire on the part of the Tribe of Satan. In fact their holy book, the Talmud, DEMANDS the trashing of other cultures.

Whilst we're all gritting our teeth and quietly despairing over what we see on our screens, the purposes of the Jew are well-served. First and foremost, our eyes are off the ball. We're totally preoccupied with the outlandish antics of these ghetto monkeys; with their shameless sexual displays and their equally disgusting, sewer-mouthed utterances. When faced with the spectacle of - for example - a Negro rapper's foul-mouthed diatribes against white society, the Jew fades totally from our collective consciousness. How convenient for them!

When we stare, open-mouthed in disbelief at the shocking behavior of these hominids, we somehow forget about the Jews and their ever-advancing agenda to destroy society and bring us all to ruin. It's a MASSIVE distraction - and that is precisely what the Jews depend on to further their evil ends. But it's actually better (for this Asiatic parasite) than it seems at first sight. The Negro has additional qualities to bring to bear in the on-going collective demise of all peoples of European origin.

In addition to taking our 'eye off the ball' and affording the TRUE culprits their much-preferred obscurity, the Negro, like his unscrupulous benefactor, has a natural inclination to drag everyone else down to gutter-level. It's in the interest of the Negro (AND the New World Order) to make our dark-skinned immigrants appear successful and popular, so the example thereby set will further encourage inter-racial breeding between themselves and gullible/ignorant white kids who have no access to wise counsel or decent parenting.

The 'dangerous edge' Negroes project is appealing to young kids who don't have any positive and inspiring role models around them (which increasingly they don't have thanks to the Jews promoting the destruction of the family unit and with that, wider society in general). Plus the Negro, as evidenced by his obsession with trashy 'bling' and 'style' - albeit as seen by normal human beings as ludicrously over-the-top - seems to turn the heads of some of our kids (who are naturally, when they're young, susceptible to anti-authority influences.

Negroes on TeeVee are just doing what unfettered Negroes naturally do when encouraged, as they constantly are, by the popular media. Older people sit back aghast at the sight of it all; fearing accusations of 'racism' if they voice a single ounce of common sense in condemnation of the spectacle before their eyes. So we can't really blame the Negro for simply doing what comes natural to him - performing like the ape he really is, and always has been. It's in his blood, you see, so we shouldn't be the least surprised. The fault actually lies with US – you and me – for permitting this situation to continue.

The conclusion of this short essay, then, dear reader, is to take pains to look BEYOND the cavorting Negro and his entourage of unwitting HIV-infected groupies, and remember that the real culprit - that which has placed the Negro on this pedestal to spout his filthy lyrics and decry anything and everything of genuine value, is our age old enemy, Organized Jewry. Now, as in times past, getting others to do its dirty work for it, whilst it snickers from the shadows at our discomfiture, fortified by the barrier of the Negroes they have erected between us and them via the blatant abuse of overwhelming, unaccountable media ownership and control.

But ultimately I must restate that it is WE - still as yet the majority though perhaps not for much longer - who are ULTIMATELY to blame, and will continue to be, for as long as our collective inaction lasts and for as long as we continue to suffer this diabolical situation in cowed silence.

If Africans are equal to everyone else, why haven't any of them....

2008-07-21T06:09:00.000-07:00

.
Composed a symphony?

Written and produced a hit Broadway show?

Written any critically-acclaimed prose or verse?

Discovered some new fundamental property of the universe?

Exported anything anyone would want to actually BUY from Africa apart from stuff that's dug out the ground or grows naturally?

Given up chopping off the limbs of babies and raping and murdering women?

Given up the practice of female genital mutilation?

Achieved any outstanding ability in anything other than breeding?

Found any cures for any tropical diseases, as opposed to simply spreading them?

Achieved any outstanding ability in anything other than destroying what hard working europeans have built up?

Come up with an internationally-popular cuisine, like virtually ever other culture? When was the last time you went out and 'ate African'?

Won any notable quiz shows to prove they're as smart as the rest of us?

Made any lasting and meaningful contribution to peace on the African continent?

Farmed land productively so as to alleviate the chronic food shortages in Africa?

Designed and mass-produced a vehicle that actually runs AT ALL?

Got anything to show for the billions of dollars in aid that they've been deluged with over many decades now?

COULD IT BE THAT BLACKS ARE 'LESS EQUAL' THAN WE'VE BEEN LED TO BELIEVE? IS IT POSSIBLE WE'VE BEEN LIED TO ABOUT THEM?

Another great essay on multiculturalism by Curt Maynard!

2008-07-21T06:06:00.000-07:00

CM:
.
I recently came across a college students essay on the Internet and it's entitled "Multiculturalism: The Subdividing of History." Originally written in 1991 the essay affords us an opportunity to look back at how this process developed over time.

The author, Julie Ann Kessler, then a senior at Ashland College, a mid sized teaching institution in Ohio, presents her thesis in a typically dry and academic format, but manages to immediately highlight a curious fact about "multiculturalism," something that was much easier to recognize and admit to fourteen years ago than it is today.

Today many of us are under the erroneous impression that "multiculturalism," was designed to encourage tolerance by bringing together members of our society through the celebration of diversity in fact the entire "multicultural movement," has been divisive from the beginning
Ms. Kessler acknowledges this fact in her first paragraph:

No debate within higher education is more divisive than the one being waged between self-proclaimed "multiculturalists" and those who could be called traditionalists in the study of Western culture.

You'll hear many people exclaim today that Jews were the initiators of this divisive agenda, and then you'll immediately hear these people referred to as anti-Semites for daring to suggest such a ridiculous hypothesis. However, Kessler pointed out in 1991 that Racism and Sexism: An Integrated Study a treatise by the Jewish Paula Rothenberg was described in Newsweek as the "primer," for multiculturalists. It is so easy for time to wear away the foundation of uncomfortable facts.

Kessler rightly points out that originally there were two schools of thought within the "multiculturalist movement," one, the "particularist," tended to emphasiz that "the experiences of one ethnic group can't have any relevance to members of another," which is nothing more than Boasian "cultural relativity," repackaged for modern consumption. According to Kessler, the other school of thought, "pluralism," "hold[s] to an all-inclusive American history, with an accent on shared experiences." What Kessler realized at the time was that both paradigms are essentially integral parts of the same puzzle, i.e. multiculturalism, and both challenged the "traditionalist" view.

We see this type of dichotomous argument often in American intellectual thought, an alleged division in ideology, but just under the surface a common agenda. More often than not one of the theories is presented in such a way as to appear to be more acceptable than the other, something Kessler also notes:

Pluralists in essence say, "American culture belongs to all of us," as opposed to "American culture belongs to us whites." The particularists, on the other hand have turned this old, exclusive view on end: "American culture does belong to whites; so celebrate your ancestral homeland instead of your present home. Ethnic and racial differences must be accentuated and hatreds fanned.

What we know fourteen years later is that "multiculturalism," won the "fixed," debate, the particularist and pluralist views merged and have left us with a singular idea, American culture does not belong to whites and ethnic and racial differences should be accentuated and hatreds fanned, except where and when whites are concerned. This wasn't an accident; this was the intention all along, something else that Kessler prophetically revealed in her analysis of something that happened at Stanford University in 1988 when the clarion call "Hey, hey, ho, ho, Western culture's got to go," initially went out.

Kessler notes how the very unlikely example of a Guatemalan female Marxist that renounced marriage and motherhood in the pursuit of the Marxist ideal was used to inculcate impressionable young minds, when she cites the fact that Stanford students were encouraged to read I, Rigoberta Menchu a book about exactly that and how that book was supposed to sensitize the students in such a way that they might "understand the perspective of female Marxist Guatemalan peasants of Indian ancestry, not to examine whether the book is valid or contributes to a student's education."

Kessler reveals a good bit of skepticism in 1991, which proved to be quite healthy in that after receiving the Nobel Prize in 1992 Rigoberto was exposed by the New York Times as a fraud. In her memoirs she notes that he brother had died of malnutrition, but a Times reporter found him alive and well, and living prosperously in Guatemala. Not unexpectedly, because central to the thesis of multiculturalism is "white oppression," Rigoberto claims that her impoverished family was subject to intimidation and oppression by "wealthy landowners of European descent." Unfortunately for Rigoberto, her fellow villagers claimed that the "dispute was really a land feud that pitted Rigoberta's father against his in-laws. It was a family quarrel that went on for years and years."

This comes as no surprise to some of us, those who read and embraced I, Rigoberta Menchu in the 1980s however might be somewhat taken aback as the Nobel Prize and her fraudulent memory still stand despite these revelations. Another interesting aspect of this story is that the same people at the Times who initially built up Rigoberto's image in the 1980s were the same ones that exposed her as a fraud in the 1990s possibly a matter of reminding a prima donna that what can be built up can also be broken down.

Kessler continues by highlighting some of the more meaningless infighting within the multiculturalist perspective, i.e. the "pluralists" refer to the "particularists," as "extremists," and the latter believe the former to be unrealistic. Sensational accusations are passed back and forth as though they have some meaning; in actuality they don't. As an example one black professor and advocate of the "pluralist perspective," refers to a Jewish professor of history at Columbia, and "particularist," Diane Ravitch, as "the ultimate, supreme, sophisticated, debonair racist" and a "Texas Jew." Ravitch then exposes the entire dichotomous scheme when she "readily admits, pluralism easily can be, and has been, transformed into particularism. In its concern to include everyone in a new common American history, to be nice to everybody and not leave anyone out, pluralism may well give rise to cultural divisiveness where none might otherwise exist."

Exactly the point, what is indeed rare though is that a senior at Ashland College in 1991 saw through the smoke and mirrors of theoretical multiculturalism, but perspectives like hers were never voiced publicly.

There is no longer any doubt, multiculturalism is a dismal failure as evidenced by the fact that tens of thousands of Americans have signed up voluntarily as part of a popular movement to patrol our nation's borders because our government refuses to do so. It is also quite clear that American society has reached the point where it will no longer silently serve as liberalisms experimental model; it has reached the point of total saturation.

Interestingly, failed liberal models have been quite common over the last one hundred years. They also tend to be extremely destructive and are almost never exposed to any subsequent scrutiny. The common denominator is that they almost always tend to be Kosher, developed and propagated by Jews. The reason they are never exposed is because Jews have monopolized the massive power and influence of the media, whether that be television, newspapers, news magazines, cinema, or through the equally cornered market of academics, American Universities and the publishing houses that provide these Universities with textbooks. For example one learns through the aforementioned mediums that the Bolshevik's employed the concept of collectivization on Russian peasantry with disastrous results. We may also learn that the concept and process of collectivization was subsequently exported to China, North Korea, Cambodia and other Asian nations, but we will never hear that the failed process which led to the deaths of more than ten million Christian Russians and Ukrainians, also failed in China, failed in North Korea and failed in Cambodia with similar results, the deaths of tens of millions!

"Multiculturalism," is nothing more than the newest failed "liberal model," a modern day "collectivization" scheme, an abortive idea that society can't seem to rid itself of. There were many Julie Ann Kessler's fourteen years ago vocally opposing what to them was an obviously flawed system, but they were denounced as racists and/or completely ignored. Today the failure of "multiculturalism," shines as a beacon in all its inglorious ineptitude leaving us the opportunity, and that is what it is, to make the changes necessary to make our country a better place to live in for our children and grandchildren.

Although the concept of "tolerance," is and has always been an American virtue, the people of this country have been taken advantage of.

America Awake!

Some revealing quotes by Benjamin Disraeli...

2008-07-18T06:09:00.000-07:00

.
The Jew Benjamin Disraeli was a long-time thorn in the side of the British Government over many decades in Victorian England. He was an agitator (typical Jewish trait) who eventually brow-beat enough good folk in the House of Commons into making him Prime Minister. This final crown of achievement came in the latter part of the 1800s, whilst Queen Victoria presided over the greatest Empire the world had ever seen. Disraeli was a self-admitted groveler to his superiors (he fawningly suggested the title of "Empress of India" be bestowed on Victoria; she loved the idea and from then on Disraeli could do no wrong in her view). He also openly admitted he only married a very rich woman for her money as he felt it would advance his political career. This guy was a sychophantic slimer of the Nth degree. But what makes Disraeli of particular interest to us here today is some of the curious quotes he came out with during his noteworthy life. We are pleased to reproduce some of them herewith with apposite observations on each...

"Frank and explicit - that is the right line to take when you wish to conceal your own mind and confuse the minds of others."

Translated: USE TYPICAL JEWISH DISINGENUOUSNESS TO GET YOUR OWN WAY.

"Colonies do not cease to be colonies because they are independent."

PRIMARILY AIMED AT AMERICA - STILL A COLONY TODAY (of the New World Order)

"Damn your principles! Stick to your party."

THE POWER ELITE CONTROLS PARTY POLICY; DON'T ROCK THE BOAT WITH YOUR UNWELCOME IDEAS OF HOW TO MAKE THE WORLD A BETTER PLACE.

"In politics nothing is contemptible."

BEING A JEW, NOTHING IN POLITICS IS CONTEMPTIBLE TO ME AND MY KIND.

"London is a modern Babylon."

IF IT WAS THEN, IT'S WORSE TODAY. WITH STABBINGS, SHOOTINGS, GANG-RAPE, CHILD PROSTITUTION AND A DRUG EPIDEMIC, IT MORE RESEMBLES THE NEW YORK OF THE EARLY 1970S

"London is a roost for every bird."

YES, EVEN MORE SO TODAY: MULTICOLORED 'BIRDS' FROM ALL OVER THE WORLD.

"Real politics are the possession and distribution of power."

CLINGING ON TO HIGH OFFICE MEANS DEVOLVING JUST ENOUGH POWER TO OTHERS TO KEEP THEM FROM OUSTING YOU.

"The governments of the present day have to deal not merely with other governments, with emperors, kings and ministers, but also with the secret societies which have everywhere their unscrupulous agents, and can at the last moment upset all the governments' plans."

NO CHANGE THERE, THEN! MASONS, JEWS AND THE ILLUMINATI STILL CALLING ALL THE SHOTS 130 YEARS LATER.

"The more you are talked about the less powerful you are."

DEAD RIGHT. HAVE YOU NOTICED THE WAY PEOPLE ONLY WHISPER ABOUT THE JEWS IN VERY, VERY, CAUTIOUS HUSHED TONES?

"The world is governed by very different personages from what is imagined by those who are not behind the scenes."

YES, AND WE NOW KNOW WHO: THE ROCKEFELLERS, THE ROTHSCHILDS, THE WINDSORS, THE MORGANS, THE DUPONTS AND ALL THE REST OF THE PARASITES.

Disraeli's premiership degraded the high watermark of Liberalism in late Victorian England. This is TRUE Liberalism we're talking about here: freedom of individual, unfettered speech and thought, the freedom to bear arms routinely in the street; the freedom to buy drugs and poisons legitimately over-the-counter from any apothecary. Freedoms that carried great responsibility. Abuse them and in those days you paid with your life. But the presumption was that you would NOT abuse them, so there were no controls, and with no Negroes around to speak of at that time, very few people misused these valuable liberties.

The measures that the Jew Disraeli was instrumental in introducing through Parliament began a long, slow decline in Britain's strength as a world power. When Disraeli initially got into 10 Downing Street, this strength and freedom was at its all-time zenith. The years and decades following his gerrymandering and meddling with the country's fundamental political structure presaged an age of decline from which Britain, to this day, has never, ever recovered. All this long, long decline can be traced back ultimately to none other than the Jew Disraeli himself. Jews HATE personal freedoms for others. Always have; always will. They NEVER cease working to undermine them and the fabric of society as a whole.

The most valuable lesson we can learn from Disraeli is that there must be NO place for the Jew in ANY sphere of public influence, for all time, period.

Apollonian writes on World Peace

2008-07-18T06:03:00.000-07:00

.
Phaedrus herewith reproduces various follow-ups which our sterling colleague, Apollonian has taken the trouble to post on this blog. Whilst the views expounded by said colleague are not ENTIRELY the views of World Peace, nonetheless, if someone takes the trouble to write expansive criticisms such as these, they should get equal coverage....

Apollonian:

On Dynasties:

[I absolutely agree w. comrade Phaedrus in principle and sentiment, and the appropriate historical mechanism which should be utilized is called JEW-EXPULSION, which should include, of course, all/any of the gentile co-conspirators.

We should have fair trials and public executions--in exactly same basic style as French Revolution, by Golly. Below expo gives a little background as for socio-biology and cause-effect. A.]

"I get the uneasy feeling that many ‘so-called’ truth sites are compromised as much as the disinfo sites. The disinfo sites have the most money by a wide margin." -Les Visible (SmokingMirrors.blogspot.com, "Money, Honey...," 13 Jul 08)

* * * * *

Addiction To Lies Continues To Render Only Death--And Never True Happiness
(Apollonian, 13 Jul 08)

Les Visible with his exposition is like an accurate mortar or howitzer--or battleship which has "bracketed" the opponent. Thus Visible keeps up an evermore accurate and telling fire, but he and we are still amazed at such (seeming, anyway) little effect upon the opponent. But Visible still does heroic work, nonetheless, and I propose to demonstrate below. For thus we more closely approach real TRUTH.

Problem then is hitting this enemy enough times--evidently. For what has happened, socio-biologically? Answer is humanity has expanded and increased its numbers so much that now what's taking place is a big KILL-OFF, a "culling" of the herd, so to speak. Thus we practical socio-biologists strive to grasp the actual truth.

And note the kill-off continues so inexorably to go on, no matter what people do to try to stop or alleviate the problem.

For observe: ever since High Middle Age (roughly about 1050 A.D.) Western humanity/civilization has expanded, its population increasing amazingly. Not even the great Black Plague of 1349 (the first large outbreak) was able to hold such pop. growth down.

Steadily, consistently throughout centuries NOTHING could stop this incredible population increase. But observe ironic consequences of this incredible population EXPLOSION--which also, of course, required a simultaneous technological improvement to go along.

This incredible pop. explosion then simply bred-up a tremendous mass of INFERIORS AND WEAKLINGS, and all these (evidently) have now to be expended and liquidated--and we aren't done yet with the great remaining kill-off.

Such then is simply necessary and overwhelmingly plain socio-biologic conclusion. And note there's no "good-evil"--it's just simply a socio-biologic functioning. Getting hung-up on "good-evil" only compounds the problem to see accurately for real TRUTH--and OBJECTIVE REALITY.

And note we try and try to figure out the great WHY for all this orgiastic slaughter and killing--and surely some understand--but not enough, not yet, despite eloquence of such as Les Visible.

I also like the outstanding video recommended by Les Visible on the "money" problem--it's just elaborated COUNTERFEITING (see also RealityZone.com for expo/ref. on US Federal Reserve Bank (Fed) fraud), which video does good job of describing (replication of paper receipts--COUNTERFEITING).

Thus we see how brilliant these COUNTERFEITERS really are, as Visible pt.s out in his above-cited quotation; THEY KNOW HOW TO INVEST their counterfeited funds, indubitably.

We (patriots, I submit) then, are up AGAINST GENIUSES, and that's part of the problem--it's why even Visible's eloquence has such little (seeming, at any rate, so far) effect.

So now, given my above prologue, I'll broach (ONCE AGAIN) my theory which is consistently ignored by the smug victims and future victims of this incredible KILL-OFF socio-biologic mechanism: people, u need to try to strive to endeavoring, to making serious attempt TO GET OFF THIS "DRUG" TO WHICH U'RE ADDICTED so hopelessly regarding "good-evil"--for it doesn't exist, and it continues to kill u steadily--as by blinding ur poor minds.

Just CUT this stupid balderdash folks: U'RE JUST LYING TO URSELVES--why?--it makes u feel good?--to pretending like little boys and girls u're "GOOD"?--what good is that if u're dead?

But people still prefer being "good" to being alive and happy--well, alive, anyway. And as long as this utterly, thoroughly insane obsession/addiction w. "good-evil" continues, WE'RE DOOMED--as that depleted uranium continues to be sown and salted evermore throughout the earth.

People, esp. dumb-shits, talk about "morality," but note such moralism is just word for logic btwn ends and means--that's all (in all truth). For there's NO POSSIBLE "MORAL" VIRTUE above HONESTY by which to grasp that necessary TRUTH.

And what's killing people (indirectly, at least) is this idiot lies and lying regarding "good-evil," once again, which morons, fools, inferiors, and weaklings pretend is to be valued above HONESTY and truth. For only TRUTH will make us FREE (Gosp. JOHN 8:32).

Thus I pt. out Jews, foremost liars (Gosp. JOHN 8:44), ARE NOT "EVIL"--they're simply agents fulfilling simple socio-biologic function, removing over-populated gentiles, that's all.

Thus even if we removed all Jews--and there were still stupid, brainless gentiles and hubrisitc inferiors and weaklings who believe in "good-evil," for thematic example--the basic PROBLEM WOULD REMAIN, and another mixed-race group would arise, pretending they're God (and so aggrieved with "persecution," etc.), and they'd then take-up where Jews left off, that's all.

CONCLUSION: So I, for one, thank Les Visible once again for his outstanding dialectic and expo by which we continue to observe like scientists and socio-biologists upon this incredible problem which so much frustrates poor, pathetic, tragedy-afflicted humanity. Honest elections and death to the Fed. Apollonian

On Jewish perfidy:

Observe a very simple little fact, presently simmering just below surface, but ready to break-out in an incredibly huge way--which cannot be stopped, and which Jews can only attempt, so pathetically, to "spin"--but which spinning ain't gonna work.

And that fact is realization, slowly taking effect, as in way, ultimately, of tremendous EPIPHANY, that hey--u know what we've all been witnesses to throughout all these years heretofore?--Jews have been carrying out evermore BLATANT "racial-cleansing," almost a full-fledged "genocide," in Palestine, practically before our very eyes.

Of course, next shoe to drop, surely, will be regarding deliberate invasion/infestation of USA by enemy races by means of "illegal immigration." But this incredible, truly horrific and most dramatic Palestinian ethnic cleansing is what will be most earth-shattering as the masses stir fm their slumber.

And of course, preceding is quite ASIDE fm USS Liberty incident of 1967 (see UssLiberty.org), for another example, fully documented. Of course Jews will trot-out old excuse: it was those "Zionists"--not the "good" Jews (Talmudists)--as if there are good child-molesters or good psychopaths (Talmudists).

Thus we've literally been hypnotized by that idiotic TV, the "Jew-tube," by means of veritable RITUALISTIC, all in accord, no doubt, with infernal, monstrous Talmud (see RevisionistHistory.org, TruthTellers.org, and Come-and-hear.com for good Talmudic expo).

And that ritualistic replete with all the lies, of course, works upon basic human hubris and potential which culminated in "Decline of the West," by Oswald Spengler, and pt. now is to RESPOND and resurge in most effective manner. Thus obligatory Jew-expulsion is necessary, but of course, and as always, Jews will spin, spin, spin, with the aid of their gentile accomplices and co-conspirators who know they'll go down too, along w. the sinking ship, S.S. Talmudic Ritual Murder.

Hence then to insure a reasonably speedy anti-semitic victory--as of St. Constantine the Great, 3rd and 4th cent.s, we only need heed and understand a few basic facts consistent with what we already know, such as gross horrific ZOG-Mammon empire/dicatatorship presently spreading, sowing, and salting our dear mother and planet earth with depleted uranium, even as we speak.

For Jews rule by means of lies, deceit, fraud (especially and ultimately by COUNTERFEITING scam--see RealityZone.com for expo/ref. on Federal Reserve Bank (Fed) fraud), extortion, terror, and murder of course, but still, it has to follow distinct pattern, an AESTHETIC, a complex, in full accord with aforementioned ritualistic, this complex formulated by means then of--HERESY--for Jews are always zealous to hide their infernal, monstrous Talmud, above all, the purpose of "Zionist" decoy/diversion.

And note heresy can and does take effect in rationalistic -type manner which includes and entails necessary military and computer technology by means of which Judeo-conspirators (see TheNewAmerican.com for expo/ref. on CFR-Bilderberg conspiracy) rule and enforce their grim, noxious, and bloody empire.

For observe if one was to identify ruling cultural theme of ZOG-Mammon dictatorship, it wouldn't be Christianity which is necessarily anti-semitic (anti-Talmud, as Gosp. Mark 7:1-13), and it wouldn't be reason (ha), esp. in view of totally degenerate repudiation of rule-of-law and US Constitution. "Mammon" itself then is just a vestige of rationalistic style featuring putrid money-grubbing as I pt'd out in previous essay (see CurtMaynardsBlog,blogspot.com, "What Rules West...," 8 Jul 08).

And what specifically now of this hereticalist complex? For we know well enough (too much) about the "Judeo-Christian" (JC--see Whtt.org and TruthTellers.org for expo/ref.) hereticalist dupes and suckers, but they couldn't be the only ones, pathetic fools and "rapture bunnies" who pretend "Christ was Jew" (hence Talmudist).

Far more serious and sublime heresy then is Pelagianism ("good-evil" delusion/fallacy)--which even most JCs believe in, surely. And I submit Pelagianism is far more controlling and effective for infernal genius and essence of dread ZOG-Mammon,beast/empire making then for most profound hereticalistic COMPLEX which acts upon public mentality as kind of delusionary mental-block, at least so far, preventing the poor volk fm penetrating definitively to otherwise sublime core of Judeo-conspiracy--manipulation of ruling hereticalist complex.

Thus, for example, while "Manchurian Candidate," McCain tries to corral the JC heretics, Obama works for the Pelagians, pretending to sophistication, all this in "good-cop vs. bad-cop" style, McCain the champion of Israel, the "conservative," Obama the "liberal" featuring United Nations (UN) "democratic" world government.

And don't doubt or under-estimate sheer sublimity of Pelagian hereticalist impulse as so many are so addicted and obsessed with hubristic, perfectly free, God-like, human will by which they imagine they can achieve "good," overcoming their inferiority complex so brilliantly and sublimely instilled by Jews in present Spenglerian "Decline...."

Thus Jew-expulsion will proceed necessarily in parallel fashion culturally, by means of revived, healthy, and true Christianity, fully and self-confidently anti-semitic, as well as by means of heightened and more energetic rationalism which rejects hubristic perfection of human will, with that absurd, pretentious, and presumptuous God-like "freedom"--human will IS NOT perfectly free--a most crucial and essential observation, psychologically and socio-biologic (see KevinMacDonald.net).

CONCLUSION: For reality, as it's OBJECTIVE, is deterministic in rejection and repudiation of ultra-subjectivism, hence hubristic and perfectly "free" will of that infernal Talmudism which so terribly and grossly inveigles gentiles to such fatal "good-evil" fallacy/delusion. Cultural key then to present horrific and Jew-dominated Spenglerian "Decline...," is that Pelagianist hereticalist complex, once again. Heresy must not be under-estimated, esp. by rationalistic-oriented people who are really and truly worst victims thereof. Honest elections and death to the Fed. Apollonian

On Curt Maynard:

Curt Maynard Foremost Editor, Genuine Leader Of Real Patriot Movement, Indubitably
(Apollonian, 12 Jul 08)

Indeed, comrade Phaedrus, and in all seriousness, Curt Maynard is surely one of very topmost blogsters and general info sources for one unquestionable and verifiable reason: literateness and scholarship (as the two go together), but MOST especially that scholarly quality which isn't easily duplicated.

Thus Maynard understands absolute necessity of sources/citations/ref.s as necessary premises/foundation for conclusions and essential substance.

Only other source who compares with Maynard for that scholarly quality would be Dave Duke (DavidDuke.com), but Duke doesn't feature blog for essential dialectic as Maynard does. This combo for scholarship and dialectic both, is what places Maynard so much at top by himself.

Another great intellect, brilliant and perspicuous in his way, is Bill White (OverThrow.com and ANSWP), of course, but White falls down too often for dedication and care to this scholarship principle, so well and consistently observed and upheld by Maynard.

Maynard is genuine rationalistic who, however, is willingly sympathetic and receptive to Christian aesthetic--unlike Linder/VNN (VanguardNewsNetwork.com), for example, Linder/VNN getting funds fm mysterious sources. Gee whiz, but I wonder who it is who ALWAYS has such bucket-loads of money, and who absolutely HATES Christianity?--hmmmm--Linder never can figure out such simple question, clever as he's always pretending to be.

Maynard is also outstanding critic and reliable talent-scout for fellow white/Christian patriots, as for Pat Grimm (ZionistWatch.wordpress.com) and others.

Maynard thus provides depth which mighty Birdman (theBirdman.org) sometimes lacks, while yet rendering very much and often similar breadth as redoubtable Birdman.

Thus it's no wonder why/how Mike Rivero of WhatReallyHappened.com features (when he does) Maynard as info source as it deflects so brilliantly ZOG-Mammon pressure, intimidation, and adverse scrutiny. For there is indubitably distinct refuge in sheer numbers for similarly dedicated dissidents. Rivero thus certainly notes and confirms Maynard's quality and real substance.

CONCLUSION: Maynard is also most excellent practical illustrator and photo-editor too. So when honest and serious evaluation is made for quality in all the various departments for public information, Curt Maynard has to come out very near topmost, if not very top itself. Thus Maynard's scholarship--which is absolutely essential for quality of info--is so well balanced for general readability and public interest for knowledge. Thank goodness for heroes like Curt Maynard. Honest elections and death to the Fed. Apollonian

On Jesse Ventura:

Comrade Phaedrus Virtuously Approaches Conception Of Necessary Analytic
(Apollonian, 10 Jul 08)

Comrade Phaedrus u give excellent exposition of very essential problematic once again; thus one concludes u're looking for fundamental analytic/criterion by which to evaluate more easily/confidently. But in accord w. Greek Tragic nature of things, surely u realize that analytic won't be too easy thing for many people as practical matter to get grasp of. Life sucks, and we're born to suffer.

Additionally Phaedrus rightly notes Jews (Talmudists) who are ultimate hubristic conspirators--LIARS (see New Testament (NT) Gosp. JOHN 8:44). Thus ultimate monument to such lying is that COUNTERFEIT MONEY (fraud) machine, the Federal Reserve Bank (Fed--see RealityZone.com for expo/ref.) which then is practical basis for all Jews' power.

Willingness then of gentiles to fall for Jew lies is the only trick for Jews. Thus Jews must rely upon corruption of gentiles who achieve prosperity, but who now indulge in hubris and corruption--thus it's CYCLIC problem/phenomena of history and socio-biology, according to "Decline of the West," by Oswald Spengler.

So obviously then we need a practical political leader who's DETERMINED to immediately removing of most infernal institution/mechanism, the Fed, engine of ZOG-Mammon beast/empire presently spreading depleted uranium throughout the world. Thus we need someone who's also INTELLECTUAL enough to see underlying basis of this infernal COUNTERFEIT conspiracy--and that's most difficult part.

For we need then someone who is dedicated to TRUTH against such lies and fraud--but as Pontius Pilate rhetorically asked in Gosp. JOHN, "what is truth?"

Thus such issue of truth then is most sublime subject of philosophy and metaphysics--which only very small percentage of folks (presently, anyway) are seriously interested in--and their problem in turn is to keep, additionally, therefore, enough of a political influence which is practical thing for these intellectuals--and all in all, IT AIN'T EASY.

Thus Oswald Spengler, once again, observed the CYCLIC nature of cultures which preserve this hold upon basic truth and virtue--but then gradually and inexorably lose it all in corruption and "decline," Jews typically classic agent of such decay, Jews ultimate liars, FOREMOST COUNTERFEITERS who have always dominated banking industry/profession, etc. (see Bernard Lazare's "Antisemitism").

Thus note at basic root of things cultural and philosophic is objective-subjective dichotomy, Jew Talmud (see RevisionistHistory.org, TruthTellers.org, and Come-and-hear.com for best Talmudic expo) ultimate in subjectivism, etc., but again, we observe that Greek Tragic nature and how so few actually, really care about such philosophic things.

So historically, we're looking for revolutionary EPIPHANY of the volk by which we achieve definitive JEW-EXPULSION in order to attempt to initiate resurgence to present Spenglerian "Decline." And hence given this analysis of things historic and socio-biologic (see KevinMacDonald.net), we see Jesse Ventura PROBABLY doesn't have the intellect--or the real courage--to be so radically, definitively, seriously ANTI-SEMITIC as we require for genuine Jew-expulsion.

Ron Paul is otherwise excellent for sheer intellect--as he focuses so brilliantly on Fed. But Paul fails for that practical RHETORIC as people need more and better for grasp of Fed which is literal COUNTERFEIT conspiracy, which concreteness Paul cannot bring himself to emphasize enough/sufficiently. Most people cannot handle Paul's kind of intellect.

Another thing is Paul fails to mention obvious Jew problem--Paul's obviously not interested in becoming a martyr.

In general then, for leader, we need genuine, serious Christian (more serious than Paul)--HENCE ANTI-SEMITE (anti-Talmud as Gosp. MARK 7:1-13). And this anti-semitic Christianity must be rationalistic, NOT MYSTIC, as such real (hence anti-semitic and rational) Christianity must overcome present hereticalist frauds which pretend to Christianity and thus shield the Jews.

So presently we're still searching, Ron Paul, the best we have--and he isn't too bad, just not seriously anti-semitic nearly enough, again. Thus we must continue to be patient and keep "eyes peeled," in prudent observation.

CONCLUSION: Thus note we're something like the Judeans of the time of Christ searching, and on look-out for "messiah"--but we can be confident people are evermore responsive and receptive as economy continues to degenerate in looming, burgeoning HYPER-INFLATION, Jews evermore ISOLATED. Honest elections and death to the Fed. Apollonian

On the Jewish writer Henry Makow:

Never Trust Jew--Especially In Matters Of Theology
(Apollonian, 10 Jul 08)

Phaedrus, good comrade, this is most excellent instance/opportunity to trash someone/something who/which deserves it--not u of course, but rather this filthy Jew, Makow, whom I've always suspected, and it's occasion to demonstrate just simplest, most basic analysis for cultural principles.

We can start w. Makow's second sentence regarding Pelagianist hereticalist "good-evil" which also just doesn't exist. Jews are simply subjectivists, foremost liars, frauds, and criminals; they're a DISEASE, specifically a disease-of-opportunity which afflicts gentile humanity as it suffers hubris in such as "Decline of the West," by Oswald Spengler.

For in OBJECTIVE universe (thus providing for "TRUTH" of Gosp. JOHN 8:32) note there is and can be no "good-evil" as there is no perfectly "free" human will, everything determined according to absolute cause-effect.

Thus Jews simply function socio-biologically (see KevinMacDonald.net), active agents removing excess over-populated gentiles suffering hubris, subjectivism, Pharisaism-moralism (esp. Pelagianism), thence socialist fascism and "hate-crime," etc.

Then as we consider second-to-last sentence from this Jew scum, regarding "essence of religion," note it is totally and absolutely impossible for us to be "selfless," nor should we try to be. Rather we must (should) be honest and forthright, at least with ourselves, and given our natures and naturally selfish beings and innate inclinations, strive to be RATIONAL.

The moral of this brief exposition of mine is NEVER, EVER trust a Jew, EVER. Even the best of them must not be trusted fully, can never be full citizens--even if it's St. Paul himself, surely greatest of all Christian saints.

And never fear an honest Jew (of race, much as this is possible/imaginable--say like old Nat Kapner of RealJewNews.com) understands perfectly well how/why they cannot and must not be trusted.

For it's tough enough for gentile to understand Christianity within all the great cultural confusion, which Christianity upholds objective nature of reality--HENCE TRUTH--objectivity the only thing giving truth its meaning, never forget.

For the real battle is that of lonely truth vs. infernal, organized, conspiratorial lies, led by Satan's very henchmen, Jews. And never doubt there's never any "morality" which can properly come before truth and reality first, then that HONESTY by which we struggle to grasp such truth.

CONCLUSION: And there's nothing more deceptive or greater affront to honesty than that filthy Jew lie to effect we can or should try to be "selfless." Rather, as I say, we must be first honest, then most rational given that necessary selfishness, selflessness lie, never forget, the founding fallacy and ideal of Jew-inspired socialist fascism/dictatorship.

Honest elections and death to the Fed. Apollonian

Eliminate these Deadly Dynasties

2008-07-15T09:50:00.000-07:00

.
The ancient Greeks are still revered today for their outstanding contributions to the fields of politics and philosophy. One of their more interesting legal statutes was this little gem:

"If a builder builds a house which subsequently falls and kills someone, then that builder's son shall be put to death."

Draconian? Inequitable? Perhaps it sounds that way to us nowadays, but to the Greeks it made perfect sense. The objective was clearly to introduce a powerful deterrent against negligence. That law was obviously framed to punish those who, through carelessness in their trade, caused the death of another. Note here that the Greeks felt it was appropriate to execute the builder's son simply for his father's NEGLIGENCE. The father need not have had any malicious INTENT in his slipshod building work; it was enough that a death had arisen ACCIDENTALLY through his incompetence.

It is interesting to speculate on what the ancient Greeks would have made of the case of New York's Twin Towers, which were PURPOSELY destroyed by design, resulting in the deaths of nearly 3,000 people, many of whom were nobly and desperately struggling to evacuate the buildings shortly before they were finally demolished with explosives, crushing these brave souls under thousands of tons of toxic rubble. I doubt the ancients could even CONCEIVE of such a monstrous act, let alone formulate a suitable punishment for it. But we can still learn a thing or two from their unique brand of ancient wisdom. The Greeks couldn't have known it at the time, but they hit on the perfect solution for eliminating the Dynasty, which has been the scourge of mankind for centuries, and never more so than in our world of today.

When the vast majority of people picture a "dynasty" they typically think of the 'great political families' like the Kennedys or the Peabodys, but the Kennedys and their like fall a good way short of the mark, because they're essentially transient in nature and don't carry the 'poison gene' of wanton destruction, ultimate greed; craven, unlimited power and wealth - and a total indifference towards the terrible sufferings of others that these ruthless, limitless ambitions demand for their fulfillment. This is the point at which most normal people get turned off from conspiracy theory. The insuperable barrier they cannot overcome is due to the phenomenon of what psychologists call "projection." This is the normal human trait in which we attempt to put ourselves in the shoes of others to get inside their minds, by using our own life outlook and experience as a paradigm. This technique is invariably doomed to fail, because there is no valid comparison whatsoever between the world-view of the average man and that of those who comprise the members of the REAL power Dynasties that run this world from the shadows.

Dynasties are basically long-surviving extended families that have amassed great wealth and power. They are secure in their positions because very little of what they're REALLY about, and their TRUE aims ever gets reported. They do, after all, have loyal friends in the media business who protect them from the public gaze at all times. The vast majority of people have NO idea whatsoever the degree of control and influence these Power Families have over our lives, and the extent to which the violently murderous, dysfunctional world we see around us has been shaped and developed by them. Who do we always blame when something goes badly wrong in America - or indeed most European countries? The Government of course! That's who. No one ever looks BEYOND the government. "The buck stops here" meme we have in the back of our minds encourages us to believe (falsely) that presidents and prime-ministers have ultimate responsibility and authority. It's not so at all. It's probably NEVER been so. We talk about puppet governments being installed in places like Afghanistan and Iraq (to name but two) but even sophisticated people don't seem to have realized that Bush in the US, Mrs. Merkel in Germany and Gordon Brown in the UK (and many, many other so-called 'democracies' - are ALSO puppets themselves; mere masks shielding the REAL power which prefers to hide among those shadows in obscurity.

So who exactly are these Power Families? To a great extent, we shall see that they are typically of Jewish stock and trace their roots back to ancient Babylon, where they practiced EXACTLY the same kind of Machiavellian deceit among the ancients that they continue to do here today in the 21st century. Incredible, isn't it? In fact it's SO incredible (to the normal, human mind) that anyone who has suggested the world is being run by a shadowy group of elite bloodlines has been roundly castigated as a 'conspiracy nut' and ridiculed. Well, up until a few years ago that was the typical response, anyway. But now, thanks entirely to the Internet, we live in more enlightened times, and we can peer into those shadows and see the entities pulling the strings of our presidents and prime ministers. There are estimated to be a core of around 300 of these extended, full-blown Dynasties calling all the shots from behind the scenes. They, personally, are responsible for the world we see around us; this world of endless war, famine, poverty, disease, social unrest, internationalism, mass migration - and much else.

So let's name a few:

The Astor Bloodline

The Collins Bloodline

The Bundy Bloodline

The Dupont Bloodline

The Freeman Bloodline

The Li Bloodline

The Onassis Bloodline

The Reynolds Bloodline

The Rockefeller Bloodline

The Rothschild Bloodline

The Russell Bloodline

The Van Duyn Bloodline

The Li Bloodline

The Onassis Bloodline

The Reynolds Bloodline

The Rockefeller Bloodline

The Rothschild Bloodline

The Russell Bloodline

The Van Duyn Bloodline

The ghoulish Merovingians (very little heard of, but possibly No.1 in the entire hierarchy of Evil.

If you go back far enough in time, you will discover that in fact ALL these seemingly disparate families are in fact of one and the same progenitor, who arose somewhere in the Middle East between what are now known as Israel and Iraq.

These figures form the very summit of the pyramid of power that has governed our lives and those of our ancestors, around the world, for thousands of years. In all that time, they have shifted, moved, adapted, morphed and re-invented themselves as the historic period required, yet never in all those thousands of years, has their essential character changed one iota. It is still driven and underpinned by the most bestial and evil of motivations. Why? Because, to put it succinctly, their God is in fact the Devil - Lucifer. Who in their right mind would accept such entities running the world? Yet that is what they are doing and have been doing since time immemorial. That time MUST now come to an abrupt end.

The whole business of empire-building (which is what Dynasties are all about, fundamentally) is concerned with building up massive power, wealth and influence which is then passed down to the next generation, and so on and so on. The families are tightly knit (necessarily so) and tend to keep their bloodlines as pure as possible. The wealth, influence and power are passed down the generations and each generation builds yet more in its lifetime to pass on to the children of the next. This is the one single, common factor that has enabled them and their twisted world view to prevail over all of recorded time - yet it is also their fundamental weakness. Dynasties cannot survive without heirs and heiresses; they would vanish within a few generations and the complexion of the world would consequently lighten immensely. Can you see where I'm heading with this argument, yet? You see, the ancient Greeks had a point. The essence of all Dynasties is the perpetuation of the bloodline. Breaking that bloodline by making the sons (or daughters) pay with their lives for the sins of the fathers (and mothers) is guaranteed to concentrate minds on the part of those who would destroy us. No longer would any of these conspiratorial entities be able to rest easy in the knowledge that they were too old and frail to be tried for their crimes; that they could simply get one of their crooked MD cronies to sign a medical certificate to that effect and escape justice. What good would that do? The revolutionary government will slaughter any and all offspring anyway. End of Dynasty, end of problem. Disarmingly simple isn't it?

Make no mistake about it. Look around you and see where the direction of the Power Families has taken us. It is not the forces of Good that are in control of this world; it is the forces of Evil and destruction: wars, famines, plagues, violence, social unrest - all the calamities that the sight of which is pleasing to their God - Lucifer. It has long been rumored that those who make a pact with the Devil can enjoy enormous wealth, power and fabulous material riches. Years ago, I dismissed such 'bible-talk' as nonsense (or at the very most just some sort of artistically-rendered parable to illustrate the consequences of being tempted away from the path of righteousness. But lately, the jig-saw is increasingly falling into place, and all the pieces fit - perfectly. Consequently, my friends, it is of the utmost importance that these Dynasties are totally destroyed beyond reconstruction, even unto those individuals who have merely a trace of those extended families' blood in them. They must be excised in the manner of a cancer - COMPLETE EXCISION. Leaving the slightest trace of that pernicious genome in existence anywhere on earth will not effect a complete cure. The much-weakened organism will eventually rebuild, and our children's children's children's children will yet again have to face the monster that we now take on in the hope of a final victory. Should we fail this time, free peoples will one day become enslaved again - TRULY enslaved. And next time, it will probably be for ever. Mark these words well, my friends. A peaceful and civilized world demands it.

Before America Goes to War Against Iran — A Quiz for the American People!

2008-07-12T09:54:00.000-07:00

.
A great expose of the REAL culprits in the Middle East conflict! Sourced from: NFTW.

Begins:

Before America goes to war against Iran, subjects thousands of Iranians and Americans to death or harm, spends billions of American dollars, skyrockets oil to over 300 dollars a barrel and over $10 a gallon, and plunges America and the world into depression and rampant terrorism, here are a few good questions! –David Duke

Which country in the Middle East actually possesses nuclear weapons?

Israel.

Which country in the Middle East refuses to sign the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty?

Israel.

Which country in the Middle East refuses to allow international inspections of its nuclear facilities?

Israel.

Which countries in the Middle East have called for the region to be a nuclear-free zone?

The Arab countries and Iran.

Which country in the Middle East occupies land belonging to other people?

Israel, which occupies a piece of Lebanon, a larger piece of Syria, East Jerusalem, the West Bank and Gaza.

Which country in the Middle East has for 60 years refused to allow refugees to return to their homes and refused to consider compensation to them for their lost property?

Israel.

Which country has roads on which citizens who are Arab may not drive and housing developments where Arabs may not live?

Israel.

Which country in the region has violated more United Nations resolutions than any other?

Israel. The United States has on more than one occasion gone to war ostensibly to enforce U.N. Security Council resolutions, but when it comes to resolutions directed against Israel, the U.S. is like the amoral monkey that sees, hears and says nothing. That raises the question of who’s the dog and who’s the tail?

Which country in the region has in the past been led by men who at one time were terrorists with a price on their heads?

Israel. Former Prime Minister Yitzhak Shamir once led the Stern Gang and ordered, among other things, the assassination of Count Folke Bernadotte, a Swedish diplomat working for the United Nations. Former Prime Minister Menachem Begin led the Irgun, a terrorist gang that among other things blew up one wing of the King David Hotel, killing nearly 100 people.

Which country in the Middle East openly employs assassination against its political enemies?

Israel. There have been assassinations carried out by some of the Arab governments, but they usually don’t own up to them. Israel has created a euphemism that the suck-up American press has readily adopted: “targeted killings.” A British journalist told me once, “The Palestinians have a talent for picking bad leaders, and the Israelis have a talent for murdering their good ones.”

What are the top five countries from which we import oil?

Here they are in order of volume:

Canada, Saudi Arabia, Mexico, Nigeria and Venezuela. The next time you hear some blowhard politician ranting about how the Arabs control our oil imports, remind him or her of the facts. By far, a majority of oil imports come from non-Arab countries.

Which country in the region receives an annual gift of $5 billion or more from Congress?

Israel.

Which foreign-aid recipient is the only one allowed to receive its aid in a lump sum and which routinely invests part of it in U.S. Treasuries so that taxpayers pay them interest on the taxpayers’ gift?

Israel.

Which country in the Middle East has the most powerful lobby in the U.S.?

Israel.

Which country in the Middle East are most American politicians, journalists and academics afraid to criticize?

Israel.

On behalf of which country has the U.S. vetoed the largest number of U.N. Security Council resolutions?

Israel.

What is the only Mideast government that actually committed terrorism against the United States?

Israel.

In 1967, Israeli airplanes and torpedo boats attacked the USS Liberty, killing 34 and terribly wounding 173 Americans. The U.S. Secretary of State at the time of the attack, Dean Rusk, and the U.S. Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Admiral Thomas Moorer, both have ardently maintained that Israel knowingly made this terrorist attack against us in an attempt to blame it on the Egyptians and induce us into war.

In the “Lavon Affair” Israeli agents committed acts of terrorist bombing against American installations in Egypt in an attempt to falsely blame the Egyptians and embroil America into another costly and deadly war. After the Mossad agents were caught and exposed, Israel had to admit its terroristic attacks against the United States. Last year the Israeli government honored the Israeli terrorists, called them heroes and gave them medals for their acts of terrorism against America!

These two events are absolutely documented and proven.

The question must by why do so few Americans even know about them. What power in the media has kept the American people from becoming aware of the Israeli terrorism, and why, instead of responding to such terror with a military response, as every American leader says is the proper response to terrorism, instead we have only sent the terrorist state more billions of American tax dollars!

What country do the people in the region consider the world’s biggest hypocrite?

The United States

But, it is not the people of the United States who are the hypocrites but the Zionist Controlled media and politicians! The American people are simply misinformed by a Jewish-extremist dominated media and Jewish-controlled political establishment.

Every truly patriotic American needs to work hard to prevent this insane planned war against Iran and the terrible catastrophe it would be for America and the world. Don’t let the Jewish extremists lead us into another catastrophic war such as in Iraq.

Read the Irrepressible Curt Maynard!

2008-07-12T09:10:00.000-07:00

.
If you look to the 'related sites of interest' section (below left) on this page, you will find an active link to a great patriot's latest blog. It's WELL worth taking a look at this unique resource (Phaedrus and friends strive to do so as often as humanly possible) owing to the kind of news coverage you probably won't find anywhere else on the internet, notwithstanding the current, healthy, burgeoning expansion of the Blogosphere.

Curt's pages are no place for the feint-hearted. He has repeatedly proved, in his former incarnations as the Politically-Correct Apostate (I & II) and through his current eponymous platform, that he is a person of indefatigable determination. Twice banned by Google for his disarmingly frank outspokenness on racial issues, he has been subdued not one iota by the dirty tricks of the corporate communists who want him silenced. He is an unapologetic stentorian truth-teller to the Nth degree. Nothing and no one will shut him up while there remains injustice in the world.

Curt's blog is one of THE most controversial on the internet. He is not a man to mince his words for fear of offending others. He treats his audience with all the sensitivity of a drill sargent with a bull-horn. There are no shades of gray in Curt's world. When something riles him he puts all his considerable energy into writing about it in the most forthright terms imaginable. No punches are pulled; no stance is too extreme. Curt's attitude is one of "if you find my style offensive, FUCK THE HELL OFF."

Once you get over the initial shock of Curt's rather 'uninhibited phraseology' however, the benefits of making his blog a regular read quickly become apparent. In Amerika today, there are crimes of unspeakable brutality being perpetrated by blacks against whites on a constant basis, yet the proportion of these outrages which ever see coverage in the mainstream news is tiny. The most gory, vicious and bestial attacks that prove the Negro race remains trapped in its savage heritage are stories that the Jewish-controlled mainstream media quietly sideline. We seldom get to hear about them and even when we do, somewhere along the line in their accounts, a white person will ultimately be in some way culpable.

The fact is that racially-motivated attacks by blacks FAR outnumber similarly-motivated attacks by whites on blacks. 50 years ago, perhaps it was different, but as everyone with a pair of eyes and a brain in their heads knows, the Amerika of today is an altogether different place from the America of half-a-century ago. Since Jewish agitators seized the initiative from decent folks back in the late 1950s and began to turn this once great country into the cultural cesspit we're obliged to suffer today, our lives have become increasingly blighted by fears of rape, murder, torture and robbery that to an overwhelming extent are carried out by out-of-control Negroes against innocent, trusting whites.

Curt, like the rest of us, is justifiably angered by this new reality, and doubly enraged about the way the jewsmedia absolutely REFUSES to acknowledge the horrific extent of the nightmare THEY have purposely created through their unremitting promotion of black-over-white culture, political-correctness, multiculturalism, massive illegal immigration and movies which glamorize murder, gangsterism, drug-taking, and virus-ridden, filthy, inter-racial sex. The Jew and the Negro have a LOT to answer for, reasons Curt - quite correctly - and if nobody else is going to take them to task over it, our Curt certainly will (just try stopping him!!)

Other blogs pussyfoot around difficult issues, but here's one that doesn't. Curt himself describes it as "in your face Truth" - which it is. It is also more than the plain unvarnished Truth that we get from half the bloggers out there. It's probably more accurate to describe Curt's work as the "plain unvarnished Truth - WITH THE VARNISH SHOT-BLASTED OFF."

Curt, for being a TRUE patriot who never minces his words or shifts his position one IOTA to accommodate anyone's phony sensitivities, Phaedrus salutes you!

That URL to remember (mark it well, friends) is...
www.curtmaynardsblog.blogspot.com

"You can take the Negro out of the jungle, but you can't take the jungle out of the Negro." - Anon.

Jesse Ventura: Braveheart or Beast?

2008-07-09T04:54:00.000-07:00

.
Has anyone heard this guy in full flow? He's an impressive orator who talks an enormous amount of breathtakingly-common sense. In fact, it's kind of tough to fault anything he says. At first sight, he appears to be a true believer. Sure, he has to moderate his language so as not to step beyond the bounds of 'acceptable standards', but there appears to be a tiger within him, eager to leap out and liberate America from the cultural and moral cesspit it's become under Zionist hegemony. He's not afraid to call the Bush Neocon-artists "chicken hawks" on prime time TV. He says they're all mad keen on sending other people's kids to fight their phony wars, yet never had the guts to step up to the plate in their own day. One valid observation among very many others he's made. His credentials are pretty strong, too. He's a former Navy SEAL (and boy does he like us all to know it) with a powerful persona and an equally powerful physique. He's the kind of leadership role model that many of us looked up to in our youth. So far so good, then.

Not content with TV appearances, Ventura has also written a book. It's called "Don't Start the Revolution Without Me" in which he sets forth a compelling agenda for consigning both political parties to history and starting again from scratch by going back to the fundamentals that made this country the libertarian powerhouse it once was. Again, it's hard to find fault with anything in it. This up-and-coming political heavyweight might even have derived the inspiration for his writings it by having his views informed, his outlook shaped and his conclusions refined from reading the kind of hard-hitting, no-nonsense material that only sees the light of day on the Internet. All in all, it's hard NOT to be impressed with Jesse Ventura at any level. He's the kind of prospective leader that most of us, if the truth be known, have longed for. Or so he seems, anyway. You may detect a note of reservation here in Phaedrus's eulogy, however, so let's dig a little deeper.

First up, there's nothing concrete I can put forward that could indicate that Ventura is anything less than he purports to be. There's no evidence of which I am aware, that this guy might be a Jew-stooge and if such a slur is implied in this critique, then it's wholly unintentional, and humble apologies at the very least are in order. Nevertheless, there are a couple of nagging doubts I have about Ventura's credibility and I'd like to share them with you here now. Firstly, he's got this book published, with its notably seditious title. Who published it? How did he get a deal for such a book when 96% of publishing houses in the West are owned/controlled by Jews and when 90% of what he says in this book is totally against Jewish interests? Secondly, he's appeared on CNN's Larry King Show at least twice, where he has been given a prominent and unfettered platform from which to espouse his revolutionary views. CNN is controlled by Time-Warner (Jewish) and Larry King (not his real name, of course) is Jewish, too. Why is such an establishment 'trouble-maker' given free rein to publicize a book so vehemently critical of the Jewish status quo?

Glimpses of powerful, alternative views espoused by charismatic mavericks that are at odds with the established order of things are virtually never granted air-time by mainstream broadcasters, so we're entitled to ask, what IS the deal with Jesse? When David Duke was briefly accorded a scant opportunity to set forth his views on CNN, he suffered a constant barrage of interruptions by a hostile Wolf Blitzer who immediately set about trying to undermine Duke by bringing up his (distant) past in the KKK. No such hostility was exhibited by Larry King during an extended and very easy-going interview in which not ONE awkward question was asked of Ventura. So once again we should ask ourselves 'why'? If this guy is on the level, how does he get prime-time jewsmedia attention with Larry King publicizing his book for him? Now please don't misunderstand old Phaedrus. No one WANTS to find fault with Ventura and I'm sure everyone in the Truth Movement hopes to God he IS the real deal for once. But I'm having a tough time reconciling this dichotomy as to why the jewsmedia are so willing to promote views that are so overwhelmingly contrary to their own.

So let's cut the crap and get to the point: if you're in a dominant position - as the Jews unquestionably are - and you see a bandwagon start rolling against you (as evidenced by the increasing number of Jew-aware bloggers and websites on the Internet of late) then how might you best derail it? We know from history that the Jews have always subverted the best of opposition movements by means of charismatic and voluble patsies they feel they can control. The Russian Revolution was a prime example out of many. Time and time again throughout history, decent folks have rebelled against the injustices they see going on around them, they attract followers, then before a critical mass of opposition can be attained, the Jews infiltrate the movement to destroy it. They select who among the malcontents they can best 'do business with' and throw their collective weight behind them. Failing that, they send in their OWN malcontents. Perhaps we are seeing something like this yet again now with the promotion of Ventura in the public mind. Giving him such exposure whilst pretending the rest of us don't exist is exactly what we would expect them to do. It takes the wind out of our sails and steals our thunder.

Finally, I'd like to once again re-iterate that Ventura MAY be on the level. MAYBE. But who would YOU rather trust to take the helm of a new revolution: someone who's lauded all over the media and who owes the Jews a debt of gratitude for the publicity, or someone else who the Jews have only ever chosen to ignore and sideline (or worse - mercilessly slander with every muck-raking accusation they can muster)? I know where MY personal preference would lie. But as a long-time student of the Jews and their infinitely devious ways, I'm only too well aware of how they work. The average American clearly is NOT. If Ventura ever makes it Big Time, then and only then will we know for sure whether or not he IS a true believer and has come to deliver us out of the clutches of the Jews, or rather the nearest thing to the biblical 'Beast' who will finally sell us all into eternal slavery. Personally, I'd be very reluctant indeed to trust ANYONE tarnished with the plaudits of the Jew. I'm sorry, Jesse: you may or may not be the real deal, but MY eventual Champion will be the guy that nobody outside of the Truth Movement has ever even heard of.

An Illuminati Primer

2008-07-09T04:50:00.000-07:00

.
By Henry Makow Ph.D.

Some of us, from time to time, have had our doubts about Henry Makow. Some of his stuff can be a bit wacko, but this essay of his that we are pleased to reproduce below is 100% bang-on. Thanks to NFTW from where it has been sourced.

Begins:

Politics has banished Religion from public discourse but Religion still offers the best description of political reality.

The essence of political struggle is actually spiritual, a cosmic battle between God (Good) and Satan (Evil) for the soul of man.

The struggle is between an international financial elite dedicated to Satan, led by the Illuminati, and the remnants of humanity that still uphold God's Plan. The unsuspecting masses hang in the balance, inhabiting a fool's paradise like children.

This struggle is not between nations, religions or between ideologies of Left or Right. This occult elite creates and controls both sides of every conflict in order to obscure and at the same time advance its long-term agenda.

The elite plan is to remake the planet as its private neo feudal preserve. This involves the reduction of the world's population through plague, catastrophe or war; mind control/breeding of the survivors as serfs; and the enshrinement of Lucifer as god.

A cataclysm could happen within the next 10-20 years. We're living on borrowed time, duped by the media and distracted by sex while the elite tests and imposes various methods of manipulation and control.

Thousands of organizations like the UN promote the elite's "world government" agenda with practically no public scrutiny. More recently, the elite instigated the Sept. 11 attacks in order to justify their "War on Terror" the repressive "Patriot Act", and Iraq War. The flooding of New Orleans, vaccinations and the bird flu epidemic are other tests or possible harbingers.

Sophisticated and dedicated people roll their eyes when told about this conspiracy. They are hypnotized by their "education" and the mass media.

The "Illuminati" sounds fantastic but it is NOT a chimera. Hidden within Freemasonry, it is the Church of Satan. Its membership was known; its premises were raided. Plans and correspondence were seized and published. Defectors attested to the grave danger at formal inquiries. It was suppressed but went underground. It has since grown so powerful that it has literally defined the modern age (under the guise of "progress," "reform" and "revolution") and now threatens the future of humanity.

THE ORIGIN OF MODERN DYSFUNCTION

The term "Illuminati" means "enlightened ones" and refers to Lucifer, the "light bringer." Its essential philosophy is to substitute "reason" i.e. expedience for "right reason" i.e. universal morality.

"Do as thou wilt" was the Illuminati motto. The Illuminati will define reality, not God or nature. Illuminism or "humanism" is a secular religion and a transition to Satanism (i.e. "tolerance"). The decline of public decency makes this increasingly apparent. Look for the world to increasingly resemble the game "Grand Theft Auto" or an occult Hollywood feature.

Whether it's a plant, a dog or a child, each flourishes naturally following its inherent design given a little nourishment and love. The Illuminati wishes to negate the inherent course of human development by promoting dysfunction under such guises as "freedom" and the cookie cutter of "equality."

The Illuminati represents the traditional feudal power elite, the alliance of European aristocracy and Jewish moneylenders, united by money, marriage and the occult. In 1770, Mayer Rothschild hired the 22-year-old Adam Weishaupt, a university instructor (son of a rabbi raised as a Catholic) to attract the cream of European society to a secret cult designed to reverse the course of Western (i.e. Christian) civilization (hence the term "revolution.")

I am summarizing "Final Warning" an online book by David Allen Rivera and James Wardner's excellent book "Unholy Alliances" (pp.34-51)

The Illuminati was founded May 1, 1776. Weishaupt wrote: "The great strength of our Order lies in its concealment, let it never appear, in any place in its own name, but always covered by another name, and another occupation. None is fitter than the three lower degrees of Freemasonry; the public is accustomed to it, expects little from it, and therefore takes little notice of it."

An understanding was reached with the Masons at the Congress of Wilhelmsbad on December 20, 1781 to add the Illuminati hierarchy to the first three degrees of Masonry. On returning home, Comte de Virieu, a Mason from the Martiniste lodge at Lyons, reported: "I can only tell you that all this is very much more serious than you think. The conspiracy which is being woven is so well thought out that it will be impossible for the Monarchy and the Church to escape it."

Nesta Webster in her book World Revolution describes the modus operandi of the Illuminati. It applies to Adolph Hitler as well as Timothy Leary: "The art of Illuminism lay in enlisting dupes as well as adepts, and by encouraging the dreams of honest visionaries or the schemes of fanatics, by flattering the vanity of ambitious egotists, by working on unbalanced brains, or by playing on such passions as greed and power, to make men of totally divergent aims serve the secret purpose of the sect."

The Illuminati also used bribes of money and sex to gain control of men in high places, and then blackmailed them with the threat of financial ruin, public exposure or assassination. This continues to the present day.

Weishaupt wrote: "One must speak sometimes in one way, sometimes in another, so that our real purpose should remain impenetrable to our inferiors." And what was that purpose? It was "nothing less than to win power and riches, to undermine secular or religious government, and to obtain the mastery of the world."

The first priority was to enlist writers, publishers and educators. The modern pantheon of great thinkers, from Darwin to Nietzsche to Marx, were Illuminati pawns or agents. Of one university, Weishaupt wrote: "All the professors are members of the Illuminati...so will all the pupils become disciples of Illuminism." (Wardner, 45)

As the Order spread throughout Germany, money was contributed from such leading Jewish families as the Oppenheimers, Wertheimers, Schusters, Speyers, Sterns and of course, the Rothschilds. Gerald B. Winrod wrote in his book Adam Weishaupt: A Human Devil "of the thirty-nine chief sub-leaders of Weishaupt, seventeen were Jews."

From Bavaria, the Order of the Illuminati spread like wildfire... Soon they had over 300 members from all walks of life, including students, merchants, doctors, lawyers, judges, professors, civil officers, bankers, and even church ministers. Some of their more notable members were: the Duke of Orleans, Duke Ernst Augustus of Saxe-Weimar-Coburg-Gotha, Prince Charles of Hesse-Cassel, Johann Gottfried von Herder (a philosopher), Count Klemens von Metternich, Catherine II of Russia, Count Gabriel de Mirabeau, Marquis of Constanza ("Diomedes"), Duke Ferdinand of Brunswick ("Aaron"), Duke Karl August of Saxe-Weimar, Johann Wolfgang von Goethe (a poet), Joseph II of Russia, Christian VII of Denmark, Gustave III of Sweden, and King Poniatowski of Poland.

By the time of the 3rd Masonic Congress in Frankfurt in 1786, the Illuminati virtually controlled all the Masonic lodges, which represented three million secret society members across the various German provinces, Austria, Hungary, England, Scotland, Poland, France, Belgium, Switzerland, Italy, Holland, Spain, Sweden, Russia, Ireland, Africa, and America. (Wardner, p. 39)

In the 1790's there was an Illuminati scare in the United States. At Charlestown, in 1798, the Reverend Jedediah Morse preached: "Practically all the civil and ecclesiastical establishments of Europe have already been shaken to their foundations by this terrible organization, the French Revolution itself is doubtless to be traced to its machinations..."
(Wardner 48)

In 1832 William Russell established a chapter of the Illuminati at Yale called the "Skull and Bones." President G.W. Bush, his father and John Kerry are members.

On Sept. 9, 1785, Joseph Utzschneider, a lawyer, and two other defectors revealed the Illuminati goals before a Court of Inquiry in Bavaria: Abolition of the Monarchy and all ordered government; Abolition of private property (which the Illuminati will assume); Abolition of Patriotism (nations); Family, (through the abolition of Marriage, Morality, and by government providing "Education" for children) and finally, Abolition of all Religion, particularly Christianity.

These are exactly the goals of Communism, enunciated by Marx in 1848. The Illuminati and Communism go hand-in-glove. The term "Reds" originates with "Red Shield" the Rothschild name. The satanic five-pointed star is the symbol of both.

CONCLUSION

Mankind has taken a wrong turn and appears doomed to annihilation. The political, cultural and economic elite of the West is either dupes or willing agents of a satanic conspiracy of cosmic proportions.

If we and our children are to suffer and die prematurely, at least we know the real reason. That is a privilege not granted to millions of our ancestors.

God and Satan made a wager for the soul of man. If God wins, man revels in the glory of his Divine Birthright. If Satan wins, man is destroyed. In a nutshell, this is the religious nature of politics.

We can instantly recapture an essential part of religion by incorporating the dictim, "Do Unto Others as You Would Have Them Do Unto You," in our lives. The essence of all true religion is to obey God (i.e. spiritual ideals like justice, truth and love) instead of personal desire, to be selfless instead of selfish. Like a snowflake, this is how disparate elements arrange themselves according to the Plan ( i.e. Love) and achieve Perfection.

Happy Independence Day, Suckers!

2008-07-03T04:47:00.000-07:00

.
Get out the barbeques and throw on some burgers and chops! Get some cold beers out of the refrigerator as yet another 'Independence Day' rolls around!

July 4th is the special day that the nation remembers how it threw off the shackles of colonial oppression and embraced freedom. A worthy concept to celebrate if ever there was one, as I'm sure we'd all agree.

There's just one slight snag, though. The freedom achieved was ephemeral. It is as far away today as it was back in 1775. One oppressor has simply been replaced by another. Funny how that often happens, isn't it? Amazingly, on the day America celebrated its very first Independence Day back in 1776, the usurpers who would go on to ruthlessly steal our freedoms away again from under our noses had already formed an organization to do precisely that just a whisker over two months before! I refer of course, to the Illuminati. This pernicious grouping wormed its way into Freemasonry and corrupted a senior branch of it as a trojan horse to steal back America from true Americans. And they have no intention of simply stopping at that. Far from it.

I'm sorry to piss on your parades today, my fellows, as you staunchly and respectfully salute the flag and sing patriotic songs, but your freedoms today for which your forefathers fought so bravely against all odds to win for you, are but an illusion. They have been spirited away piecemeal by alien interests in order to serve their three driving passions: massive personal enrichment, ultimate power, and a visceral hatred of healthy, flourishing, civil societies. The only people today who have any genuine reason to celebrate this anniversary are the very same elements that formed the Illuminati on May 1st, 1776. They alone can meaningfully rejoice over their stunning success in robbing decent (though all-too-gullible) people from their golden destiny without them even being aware of it.

So I say to you regular Americans of today, enjoy your mindless feasting, binging and cheering whilst you can; whilst there is still relatively plenty to go around, for believe me, a year from now you will be very, very much less sanguine in your outlook towards this once great country. Hopefully by then, however, you may have finally woken up to the REAL history of post-Revolutionary America and re-evaluated your priorities. Until then, enjoy your phony festival while you may. The Jews and their crooked sell-out cronies in Washington will be partying too. And no doubt your delusional beliefs about how fortunate and free you are - God Bless America! - will provide an additional comic flavor to their own, rather more exclusive and very much more justified, private celebrations.

"Never underestimate the stupidity of the American people." - Anon.

The Deafening Silence...

2008-06-30T06:17:00.000-07:00

.
Considering the ever-increasing surge of seriously disturbing accusations being leveled at our old friends, the Jews, it is rather curious indeed that their direct responses have been so remarkably distant and detached. Now please don't misunderstand Phaedrus here. We are all well aware that they're screaming "anti-Semitism!" at the top of their shrill little voices at those of us who seek to expose the truth about them and their very curious history. Nothing too surprising about that, of course. And not only that, but they're lobbying their pet governments in the West to introduce ever more ingeniously-contrived 'Hate Crime' laws to prevent legitimate researchers into the Jewish Problem from communicating their shocking findings to a wider audience. Speaking the truth is becoming increasingly criminalized. Anyone and everyone who speaks in negative terms about the Jews must be trussed-up and gagged by any means possible. Now this situation will strike a lot of people as downright unfair, not least for the reasons I set out below.

It's not odd at all, however, that the Jews would like to see all opposition to them crushed; that's only to be expected. But the really curious thing that is awakening suspicions among even some Liberals, is that these extremely broad, blanket responses are their SOLE weapon of choice against us. This limited technique of theirs works fine when the opposition against them is patchy, insufficiently motivated and improperly informed. They can push for censorship on the grounds that ignorant bigots are spreading lies about them just because they're a minority race of people who are simply misunderstood. And for a long, long time now, that's worked well for them. But lately, things are beginning to change. In the face of a absolute firestorm of lurid accusations swirling around about them on the internet, one thing is increasingly obvious by its total absence: any effort to directly engage their accusers face-to-face.

The Jews simply WILL NOT discuss specific allegations. Curiously, they choose not to defend themselves in the way you or I would INSIST upon, were it we that were on the receiving end of such endless diatribes. Now at first, this could be explained away (and it was) by simply claiming that the Jews didn`t want to 'provide a platform for racists.' In the early days (pre-internet) that excuse was widely accepted among the sheeple, who dutifully nodded their heads in unison with this noble sentiment. After all, back then it did seem a perfectly plausible reason. But as time has worn on and the accusations only grow louder and more insistent, to continue to remain silent increasingly seems to imply that they are unable to discuss these matters for the simple reason that they CANNOT counter them; the accusations (crazy sounding that they may be to the uninformed) are NOT baseless. They are grounded in vast stacks of high quality documentary evidence which when put before a Jew would leave him stultified with no answers and nowhere to run. Hence they resort to blanket denials which are not open to cross-examination, and increasing efforts to gag us through the courts.

We see a form of this vigorous avoidance of the pertinent questions every year on Holocau$t Memorial Day. Endlessly we re-live the terrible suffering of the poor Jews at the hands of those terrible Nazis, yet, bizarrely, no mention is EVER made of WHAT precisely it was about the Jews that made Hitler act towards them in such a draconian way. Have you ever heard an old German soldier recounting WHY he was told to seek out Jews? You haven't? Me neither. So we never get to the hear the OTHER side. And this outstanding omission becomes more and more obvious with every Holocau$t retrospective we're forced to endure. Things happen for a REASON, and the Holocau$t was no exception. It takes an enormous amount of pent-up anger and resentment on the part of one set of people to treat another set of people so harshly. What were the underlying resentments behind this antipathy? We are NEVER told. All we ARE told is that the Jews were victims of a terrible program to wipe them all out. No background for this is ever provided by the mainstream media. We are simply expected not to pick-up on this fundamental question.

If you or I were accused of half the things the Jews have been accused of (financing endless wars, corrupting society, sacrificing young children in quasi-satanic ceremonies, drinking the blood of those whom they are about to kill, poisoning the desert wells of their neighbors, murdering Palestinian children for the fun of it, stealing land that doesn't belong to them, being out for their own selfish gain regardless of the consequences to others, false flag attacks against the US to drag us into their never-ending foreign wars to name but a few of their many unique qualities) then I'm damn certain WE would DEMAND the right to confront our accusers so we could PROVE them liars and/or madmen for the entire world to see - and put and end to such 'vile rumors' for ever. It's becoming increasingly odd to folks that the Jews response is simply to try to put these allegations beyond debate by generating taboos around them. One would have thought (if they had nothing to hide) that they would have been only too happy after so many thousands of years of being reviled and persecuted, to avail themselves of a great opportunity to set the record straight. Yet they won't. And I believe now that ordinary people are beginning to wonder - why the deafening silence?

The Pusher at the School Gates

2008-06-27T08:38:00.000-07:00

.
Allegories are useful tools for conveying to others the essence of complicated situations. The situation we're about to explore below is only made complicated by the powers that be in order to protect themselves and their overlords, the Jews. I've employed this method before, but only in passing and didn't really give it the attention it deserves. The time has come to flesh it out, because it goes to the very root of our problem in the West today and will no doubt assist those who have difficulties in understanding why we "anti-Semites" are so angry about the terrible things being done unceasingly by these vampires against decent people and their families. Some day if I get arrested for being a "hate-monger" I plan to use it in court to get my view over to the jury (if the jury system survives) in a readily comprehensible form. You might like to avail yourself of it, too, should the suppression of free speech in the West come to match or exceed that which we see in countries such as China or Burma.

Imagine, if you will, that you inhabit an apartment that overlooks a local school. Let's say you're retired and don't have too much to do all day, so you sit on the balcony just enjoying the sunshine and maybe reading a decent book. Every afternoon at the same time, the noisy chattering of the townsfolks' kids echoes over to you as they leave lessons for another day. You gaze across at them trooping home with a degree of paternalistic concern. You wonder what sort of a world they'll be inhabiting by the time you're no longer around. You sigh resignedly with the nostalgia of your own schooldays when life was so much simpler and the cultural environment infinitely more wholesome.

Another day rolls around and the chattering of the children once again assails your ears. You put down your book, having difficulty concentrating against the backdrop of this customary disturbance, and turn your gaze over to the school gates, once again fondly musing on your own innocent, long-gone school days. But something's different on this day. There's a somewhat older guy just a few yards down from the gate the children are leaving by and calling them on over to him. Some hang out with this stranger a while, others just drift on by. You think little of it. Maybe it's just a former teacher stopping by to say hello to some of his old charges. The noise diminishes in time and you get back into your book.

Some days later and you're on your balcony again. You hear the laughter and general cheeriness of the kids coming out after the completion of another school day. Oh, it's that time of the afternoon again, so you put down your book and watch the kids leave. They're in high spirits as ever. After all it's a good school in a good area and you rarely hear of any bullying or similar trouble. The scene is really quite idyllic. You're sitting there with your feet up, enjoying the sun, and watching small town life go past before your eyes. But then you notice the same, slightly older guy again, maybe 10 feet from the gate. And again he's calling some of the kids over and again some do, whilst others appear oblivious.

You're rather more suspicious this time. He doesn't look like a sex offender - whatever 'they' look like - and isn't acting like some pervert might, either. All the same, though, it's a little odd. Maybe he's one of the kid's big brothers between jobs and just likes to collect his little brother from classes and chew the rag with a few of the lad's pals. Yeah, that's probably all it is. You have no reason to suspect there's anything untoward about this older guy and this little town is a place where people don't even spit chewing gum on the sidewalk. Nothing ever happens here. It's peaceful and quiet, thank goodness. The local cops think they've had a bad day if they have to hand out more than a dozen speeding tickets.

It's now nearly two weeks later, and this guy has become quite a regular visitor. He can't be picking up a younger relative, though, as it seems there isn't anyone in particular among his little 'posse' with whom he leaves. Your curiosity is now pricked. You haven't any binoculars, but photography has always been a passion of yours, so you go back in the house and get your latest camera, attaching the longest lens you can find. What CAN they be doing? Now you're right up close with a much better view. Your blood freezes in your veins, for this guy is selling DRUGS to the kids! There can be no mistake. You see him taking money and furtively handing back little packets of what can only realistically be drugs! Your vigilance has paid off big-time: you've caught a dope dealer in action!

Your hands are shaking so badly from the shock of this sudden revelation that you can't get a good photo off. All the images from the pictures you've taken are without exception, blurry and juddery. Hell! What to do? What to do? You return indoors still reeling from your shattering discovery. This kind of thing NEVER happens in this little town. It only ever happens in larger towns and cities. You've seen pictures of it on TV and can't bring yourself to believe it's happening here, in small town America, right in front of your very eyes! Your heart is pumping nineteen to the dozen. You make a cup of coffee and try to calm down, but you're still shaking so badly out of a combination of shock and anger that you end up spilling most of it on the floor.

The very next day, this creep is once again at the school gates and you know what's coming. You're rather more cool and calm now that 24 hours of passed; still mad as hell, of course, but at least the shakes have gone. You steady your camera, zoom into the scene unfolding again before you, and crack off several good shots, all of which show money being exchanged for small packets of dope. "Got the bastard!" you whisper under your breath. You flick back through the pictures on the camera's rear screen. They're good, bright and sharp: excellent evidence. You return indoors to your computer to print them out, make yourself a congratulatory coffee (which you don't spill this time) and tuck the photos safely away in an envelope.

10am the next morning and you take your file of evidence straight to the police in the not unreasonable expectation that swift action will follow. You are somewhat dismayed, however, when the cop on duty screws his face up, takes a deep breath and asks you to wait whilst he takes them to a superior. "What's his problem," you wonder. Not enough pictures? Weren't they sharp enough? Or did he recognize the child of a colleague in one of the frames. Could be embarrassing, that! After a while two sargents appear, both looking very serious."What do you want us to do with these?" they inquire. Now you really ARE confused! "What do you think?" you reply in surprise, "I want you to nail this creep for selling drugs to kids. It's obvious enough, isn't it? This should be all the evidence you need here."

The older of the two sargents hands the envelope back to you. You sense deep unease in his demeanor. Something is just not right and you can't work out what it could possibly be. "What?? You mean you're not going to act on this??" you stutter incredulously. "I'm afraid there's nothing we can do," replies the younger cop, coldly. "But this guy is breaking the law in broad daylight selling drugs to schoolchildren!" You can feel your anger rising now, even higher than your confusion. "There's nothing any of us can do about it," they reply in unison. "Cases like these always get dropped at a higher level. It's just a waste of time," chimes in the older of the two. "My best advice to you," says the first cop with some gravity in his voice, "is to just turn a blind eye to it. Instances like this are simply more trouble than they're worth to get involved with."

You tuck your photos back in your pocket and storm out of the building, shaking your head in disgust and disbelief. The cops didn't want to know! The cops didn't want to know! This isn't how it's supposed to be in America! What the hell do these people think they're doing protecting this JERK? He's ruining these kids' futures, setting them on course for a lifetime of dependence and misery; many of them will end up in jail eventually from trying to feed the habit that this bastard is introducing them to (for his own selfish enrichment) and the law enforcement authorities could care less about it! What the hell is happening in this country? You head back to your apartment, experiencing several near-misses with other vehicles because your mind is totally preoccupied with the unbelievable stonewalling you got from the cops.

When you get home, your anger has just about reaching boiling point. You fix yourself another coffee, spilling most of it again, and sit out on the balcony to work out what to do next. The options seem pretty limited. You'd counted on the police to do what they're supposed to do, yet they won't lift a finger to help. The hours go by, but you just get more and more frustrated and angry. Going down there and busting this asshole on the nose is out of the question. 40 years ago, for sure! But age is not on your side and not only that, but you know that many of 'his sort' go around packing a gun. Why the hell should YOU - an older private citizen - have to turn vigilante and risk your life for something that the police should have willingly and instantly dealt with? The whole situation just baffles you.

After much deep thought, however, you come up with a great idea. You'll put up notices around the area to warn the parents about what's going on! You'll fire up that desk-top-publishing program and print dozens of warning posters with the best picture you took at the top of each sheet, being careful to pixelate the faces of the students, of course, but making sure the culprit is exposed clearly for the whole neighborhood to see! Yeah! That ought to do it! You set to work that very afternoon, spurred on by seeing the dope pusher up to his usual tricks with the kids again outside the school. "I'll fix that bastard!" you laugh to yourself, "Don't need those stupid cops after all!" Wasting no time, a few hours later you have a stack of 50 posters ready to go. "The cops might be useless, lazy, corrupt or incompetent, but they can't stop me from warning the parents!"

Next day, bright and early, you're out in the locality with your posters, a hammer and a box of tacks. Nothing's simpler than posting bills, and it doesn't take you very long before the first dozen are done. Much to your delight, you see one or two early-risers, dog-walkers and joggers, have already spotted them and have stopped to take a look-see. You fancy you know what their reaction will be: mad as hell! A short time later, however, you're just banging in a last nail on the 20th poster when a police cruiser pulls up along side. Two officers get out, one of which you'd encountered in the police station the day before. To your amazement, they're carrying several of of your warning notices; their jagged edges indicating they've just been hurriedly torn down...

Now things begin to take on an almost surreal quality. Without a word, the cops seize your remaining posters, the hammer and nails and bundle you into the back of the cruiser. Looks like you're heading down town. What the hell is going on? Why are they suddenly treating you like a common criminal? What the heck are they going to bust you for? Littering? People put up posters all the time and no one ever says nothing. "Would one of you people care to read me my rights?" you indignantly inquire. Silence. Neither officer says a word. Within minutes, the cruiser pulls up beside the police station and you're taken inside. The officers at the front desk seem to already know something. How odd. You can't believe all this trouble you're being put through just for trying to perform a civic service to your fellow neighborhood residents.

The younger officer is at the desk, unlike yesterday, working alone. He looks up as you're escorted in. Something in his eyes tells you what ever is coming, it's not going to be good. Finally, you get read your rights, although you really can't imagine why, as an honest citizen with no former convictions, you'd need to avail yourself of them. You will certainly not be pleading the 5th! You stride purposely up to the counter, look the cop straight in the eyes and say, "Is somebody going to tell me what the hell I'm supposed to have done?" The sargent raises his eyes and shoots you this cold, contemptuous look - the kind of look you imagine he normally reserves for someone hauled in on a major felony. He puts down his pen and says, "We already told you once to drop this. This is your second and final warning. If we have to haul you in again, you'll be charged." The hard glaze on his eyes tell you this cop isn't kidding. A moment's silence ensues before you can gather your wits.

"Charged??" you stammer, "charged with WHAT?" "Hate crime," replies the officer impassively. You're momentarily stunned. "Hate crime? Hate crime? How the hell do you arrive at charge like that? I'm no racist and the creep selling the drugs isn't black, nor even gay from what I've seen! Hate crime my ass!!" At this point a side door opens and a powerfully-built man in slacks and a sports jacket emerges. He motions to the cop to bring you over. You're guided through the door and into a small, sparsely-furnished room. The newcomer introduces himself as a detective and invites you to take a seat. He nods to the uniformed cop to leave the room, then turns to face you, remaining standing with a desk between you and him. You notice the desk is bolted to the floor. There's one window in this room, but the glass is frosted so there's no view of the outside. The atmosphere is rather intimidating, but you refuse to be cowed by it.

"Are YOU going to tell me what I'm supposed to have done?" you justifiably ask.
"Look, I'm gonna level with you," says the detective, "you were in the process of committing a serious felony in putting up those posters of yours and your actions amount to a hate crime, because by doing what you did, you're likely to arouse the anger of the community, and that can get ugly and out-of-control. You're fueling a lynch-mob mentality by putting up inflammatory material like that. This guy you claim is a drug dealer might be nothing of the sort yet wind up dead as a result of your actions. There's no telling where it might all end."
You're stunned and speechless at his words. He continues, "Do you know what will happen if you're convicted of a hate crime? First off, you go to jail, period. Could be 2 years; could be 10. Then there's a potentially unlimited fine. Plus all your property is subject to confiscation. It's a very serious matter indeed." You slouch back in the chair and cover your face with your hands. It's like some horribly bad dream - but it's ugly reality.

Now you're on the defensive. This guy has clearly misunderstood your motives. Yeah, that's got to be it. He'll understand if you just get your point across. "But I wasn't INTENDING to stir up any trouble," you begin. " - Doesn't matter," he cuts in, "your motives don't come into it. The applicable laws don't even consider them." "And this CREEP wasn't black, gay, hispanic, Jewish or anything else!" "That's irrelevant, too," replies the cop, "all the law is concerned with, in essence, is that you don't do anything which COULD incite hatred towards others."
"I was only acting for the public good!" you protest. "No defense," the cop states blankly, "I already done told you the law doesn't care what your motivations were; only with the possible CONSEQUENCES of your actions. Let's say for the sake of argument that you're right. This guy IS a dope peddler, but the parents, rather than form a lynch-mob, just escort their kids from the school, all nice and peaceful. That's no mitigation, because the material you distributed COULD still have given rise to big trouble among the community. That's still enough for a guilty verdict."

You pause momentarily taking in the enormity of what you've just be told. Being read the Riot Act for simply being a public-spirited citizen and trying to look out for your neighbors' kids is the last thing you expected. And now you're a hate criminal! "You're free to call a lawyer if you want," continues the cop, "but they'll just tell you exactly what I just did. It's your choice."
You martial together what remains of your resolve: "So basically what you're saying is that anyone can do anything they like to wreck society, but we mustn't raise awareness of it for fear of making decent people angry??"
"You can look at it any way you want," continues the cop, "we police officers don't MAKE the laws, we only ENFORCE them - and we DO enforce them. You have been warned for the last time. Today you walk out of here a free man, but if we ever find you're continuing with this one-man campaign of yours, by whatever means, even if it's just talking to people about it on the street, then you'll be back in here and charged under the hate crime legislation before you can say 'Thomas Jefferson.'"

Ladies and gentlemen, this is the nightmarish situation we're increasingly facing today with Western governments' strenuous efforts to suppress the Truth. The powers that be are contriving ever more devious and ingenious methods to prevent us from warning others about what is going on around us and who is behind it all. The time is already upon us to make the Big Decision: to remain cowed and silent whilst Evil flourishes, or to take a stand and REFUSE to submit to this new tyranny. Phaedrus and others in the blogosphere and elsewhere have already made that choice. If YOU haven't already done so, you'd better make your mind up damn fast, because the future of your children and their children will be extremely bleak, if everything that made us what we are increasingly ceasing to be, is further flushed into the rancid, malodorous, Jewish cesspit of cultural, ethnic, moral and social disintegration.

New York "Millionairess" gets 11 years for enslavement

2008-06-27T08:33:00.000-07:00

.
This is what they'd like to do to us ALL. Make no mistake about it:

http://www.cnn.com/2008/CRIME/06/26/sabhnani.sentence.ap/index.html

Note the bitch got a sentence less than the SCG state. Maybe her "lawyer" knew the judge.

Their Next Moves Towards Total Control

2008-06-23T10:24:00.000-07:00

.
In a recent interview to the mainstream media which for some reason or another received more exposure in Europe than America, the incorrigible NWO-proponent, David Rockefeller made a quite remarkable admission. The 93 year-old billionaire stated on record that he STILL picks up cents he finds on the street! Not surprisingly, this fact was picked up on by so-called "right-wing" bloggers who went on to gleefully portray it as marking him out as displaying a "typical Jewish" character trait. The whole tone of their reporting of this disarmingly frank admission on Rockefeller's part was one of scathing satire. They sought to pillory Rockefeller over his penny-pinching for its dubious humor value, yet singularly failed to look beyond it. This was a rather unfortunate omission on their part which we will attempt to remedy here in this article.

Anyone who knows anything about the way the world is run will know that Rockefeller is one of a handful of global 'kingpins' who have shaped this ugly world in which we live in the fashion of their own craven image. To present this issue solely as a points-scoring exercise to 'get one over on the Jews' is a total cop-out. We are not talking about some wacky, Jewish pawnbroker or tailor or theoretical physicist or whatever else it may be the Jews typically gravitate to, but rather a man who, through his vast wealth and intimate, high-level contacts with others, has marked him out as what Huxley (in the original Brave New World) described as a "World Controller" - he and his fellow Satan-worshipers (no kidding!)formulate the Plan - the Jewish Agenda - and their underlings comprising presidents, prime ministers, kings and queens subsequently implement it supranationally. There is now precious little, if any, escape from it anywhere in the West. Wherever one goes, regardless of the Will of the people, this Agenda is being inexorably rolled-out, like it or not.

In which ever country we reside, though the names of the governments and political parties may change, this illusion of choice renders true democracy utterly impotent. There is NO real, meaningful democracy now in the US, Canada, Britain, France and Germany, to name but five out of an untold number of countries among which this virus has become endemic. In the US, we have 'One Party with two Names'. They're essentially no different beyond a little superficial varnish and style of logo. It's the same in Europe. Choice is an illusion and leaders are not elected, but SELECTED by the likes of Rockefeller in the US, his fellow Jew, Evelyn (Baron)Rothschild in London, and 'good friend of Israel', Rupert Murdoch in Australia. The circle of this ultimate power is rather wider, but is dominated as one might expect, by Jews who all share Rockefeller's pathogenic craving for money. Phaedrus believes that when a 93 year-old billionaire - of any ethnic background - can't keep himself from picking up nickels in the street, then something is desperately wrong with said person.

Such a person is not acting rationally, and it's NOT a subject for humor any more than it is for sympathy. Behavior such as this is pathological; it's a form of mental illness. I don't know about you, but I don't want somebody with this character trait running the Western world. There must be no room for these sickos in any sphere of policy formation for they are clearly ill and out of touch with reality. Worse yet, Rockefeller has intimate designs on us which his aforementioned underlings are in the process of developing under the guise of "real ID" - which on the face of it sounds innocuous enough, which is just how it's supposed to sound (to begin with, anyway) however in reality it is everything BUT harmless. Rockefeller and his kind want everyone micro-chipped. They want EVERYONE to be implanted with a tiny device, little bigger than a grain of rice, that will tell the authorities exactly where each of us is and who we are with, every minute of every day, for as long as we live. The technology is already here. It is now simply a matter of implementation. This is the tricky part, but sadly it is far from an insuperable barrier as we shall see below.

The initial reaction of most decent people on hearing about this program is understandably one of deep suspicion. It brings Big Brother right up to our faces and it ain't pretty. The Jews know this - and they're smart people. They've contrived a P-R charm offensive which will mollify the worst doubts and fears of the majority of citizens. And to be fair, the arguments they will use to push this measure through are very powerful. They'll tell us that we'll no longer need to worry about passports at airports to fly, nor at the bank to draw money. They'll tell us that our children will never again be at risk of kidnap or abduction by strangers. They'll extol the fact that any spouse that's in breach of a restraining order from seeing his family will be instantly identified as having strayed outside his court-sanctioned area and will be picked up and arrested before he or she can do any harm to his or her estranged family.

And it doesn't end there. They'll further induce us with the prospect that from then on in, there'll be no more wrongful convictions. Suspects will be back-traced to the precise moment a murder or robbery was committed to see if they were indeed present at the crime scene. There'll be no more need for flawed alibi evidence and no more false alibis. Only the guilty will be convicted; the innocent exonerated. Furthermore, crooks "on the run" will become a thing of the past as there will be nowhere for them to hide with these tracking transponders buried deep under their flesh, flagging their location to the government every few seconds. Eventually, EVERYTHING we need will be on these chips. We won't need to take any ID or money with us when we go on holiday. Our passports can't then be stolen, neither can our cash. We have to face the facts, here, guys; the arguments in favor of micro-chipping are very hard indeed to counter - certainly for the average Joe of limited intelligence, at any rate. Of course, to those of us acutely aware that the REAL agenda is very much less benign will already be seeing many grave dangers that this technology threatends.

For an overview of how such a potentially invaluable system might be misused, we need not, however, resort to our fevered imaginations, for David Rockefeller has already spilled the beans in some off-the-cuff remarks he made earlier this year. What did he let slip? Pretty much what you might imagine. Since we're all busy people and time is short, let's summarize his exposition on the matter. What follows is not verbatim, but it's the gist, the guts, the essence of what he revealed:

The plan should require little compulsion until the latter stages. Initially it will be rolled out for the protection of children and most parents will welcome it. Even if it WERE made compulsory for ALL children to be micro-chipped, the vast majority of parents would willingly consent to it, since the protection of their kids naturally comes above all else in any decent parent's mind. Next, the folks in the prisons will be chipped; petty crooks included. They'll be told they'll be eligible for earlier release on parole now the authorities can keep total tabs on their whereabouts. Most prisoners aren't too smart and will readily submit to any initiative that gets them out of the slammer earlier than would otherwise be the case. Further on down the line, citizens' chips will carry more financial information on their tax status, their CV history and so-forth, and employers will be encouraged through tax-breaks, to only hire workers who are so chipped. All the while an ever-shrinking group of libertarians who have resisted signing up for implantation will find living their lives increasingly difficult due to essential services becoming less and less available around them.

In the final stages of the roll-out, it may become impossible, in a then cashless society, to even buy basic groceries at a supermarket if you haven't been chipped-up, as all your money will be on the chip and your salary will be credited directly to it. There will be no fine-defaulting in future as any fines you incur will be deducted remotely from your chip. Likewise, child-support payments and such like. Running off and setting up home someplace else under a new name will no longer do any good for deadbeat dads who try to evade their responsibilities towards the children they have fathered. This will all sound fairly sensible to Joe Public on the face of it. Chipping undeniably confers many benefits - if administered by a benevolent government, of course. But Rockefeller and his cohorts are very far from benign. When asked to consider the civil rights aspects and what might happen in future if protesters or dissidents subsequently formed the view that the information held on their chips had become too extensive, intrusive, or was being misused, he replied, "Oh, well, those people will have simply have their chips turned off. They'll become essentially non-persons."

Phaedrus wonders how dissidents and activists such as ourselves would manage in a cashless, cardless, passportless future with our identities and our savings summary stripped from us. It could be pretty tough to survive! And doubtless that is exactly what THEY will wish to ensure for anyone with the audacity to say "NO!"

Huxley Warned Us: parts 1 to 16 complete

2008-06-19T09:12:00.001-07:00

In answer to the request from Kenny's Sideshow (great blog, guys) I'm reposting this series as I gather quite a lot of folks have also missed the odd part or two from their archives...

Huxley Warned Us: Part 16
This, the final part of our examination of the key points arising out of Huxley's dire prediction of the future contains a vital warning message for us all. Calling out to us from a half a century ago, the great visionary wrote:

"The methods employed by orthodox educators were and still are extremely inefficient. Under a scientific dictator education will really work - with the result that most men and women will grow up to love their servitude and will never dream of revolution. There seems to be no good reason why a thoroughly scientific dictatorship should ever be overthrown.

"Meanwhile there is still freedom left in the world. Many young people, it is true, do not seem to value freedom. But some of us still believe that, without freedom, human beings cannot become fully human and that freedom is therefore supremely valuable. Perhaps the forces that now menace freedom are too strong to be resisted for very long. It is still our duty to do whatever we can to resist them them."

But sadly we haven't. Everything that makes us what we are has been and continues to be spirited away from us little by little. 50 years after Huxley's strident warning, we've continued to permit this situation to develop through our indifference and collective apathy. We've been too preoccupied - as Huxley observed - with our "endless appetite for distractions" - which Baywatch actress has the biggest tits; Britney Spears' antics, the NFL rankings, blockbuster movies, must-have gadgets, Beyonce's ass, Gerry Springer, Rikki Lake and Oprah Winfrey. We've been hypnotized by all these media rodeo clowns while the Zionist bull was busy trashing our cultural china shop.

Our enemies, that is to say, the traitors who make our laws and broker deals with foreign powers behind our backs; who sell our liberties and hard-fought freedoms for 30 pieces of Jewish silver are all part of the same poison pot, to wit: newspaper proprietors, magazine editors, TV studio executives, movie producers, advertising agents, talk-show hosts, Marxists, internationalists, Jewish bankers, Senior Freemasons, CEOs of global corporations and the One World Government in waiting: the Bilderbergers, the Trilateralists, the CFRers, AIPAC and all the rest of the lying, scheming, cheating scum.

There are some very smart people in the above list, however, make no mistake about it. Whilst you and me have been drunkenly slurring in some seedy bar over who the Red Sox's best ever pitcher was, the agents of our destruction were slowly but surely drawing their plans against us (to paraphrase Wells). They have researched with exquisite detail all our foibles and failings. They are master manipulators par excellence. If we continue with our blind indifference to our approaching fate, then we'll have fully deserved it. Huxley's final conclusion in the lines quoted above is:

"There seems to be no good reason why a thoroughly scientific dictatorship should ever be overthrown."

Think about that stark assessment for a moment. It's perfectly correct. Once they've finally got us, they've got us for keeps. Us, our children and our children's children's children. They'll have completely re-written history by then. As a people, we won't know who we are any more. We'll be whatever THEY tell us we are. This revisionism - the only kind permitted it seems - has ALREADY been underway in the West for some time, as you may be aware. In due course we will become irreversibly enslaved by these criminals for all time to come - just as their 'holy' book foretells. As Huxley states, it simply won't occur to our grandchildren to question their subservience, but even if they were to, the Jews would have ALL the answers. I don't know about you, but as far as this blogger is concerned, that's a prospect that's worth fighting to the last drop of blood to prevent. I WILL NOT BETRAY MY CULTURAL HERITAGE.

Huxley Warned Us: Part 15
Brave New World Revisited, 1958:

"We see, then, that the disease of over-organization has been clearly recognized, that various comprehensive remedies have been prescribed and that experimental treatments of symptoms have been attempted here and there, often with considerable success. And yet, in spite of all this preaching and this exemplary practice, the disease grows steadily worse.
We know that it is unsafe to allow power to be concentrated in the hands of a ruling oligarchy; nevertheless power is in fact being concentrated in fewer and fewer hands. We know that, for most people, life in a huge modern city is anonymous, atomic, less than fully human; nevertheless the huge cities grow steadily huger and the pattern of urban-industrial living remains unchanged. We know that, in a very large complex society, democracy is almost meaningless except in relation to autonomous groups of manageable size; nevertheless more and more of every nation's affairs are managed by the bureaucrats of Big Government and Big Business. It is only too evident that, in practice, the problem of over-organization is almost as hard to solve as the problem of overpopulation. In both cases we know what ought to be done; but in neither case have we been able, as yet, to act effectively upon our knowledge."

This situation of over-organization to which Huxley constantly returns during the course of his work is no accident, but has in fact arisen by design. Organizational complexity is an absolute NECESSITY for the Jew to carry out his plans; his machinations would be readily exposed without it. One thing Jews hate above all else is EXPOSURE. Hitler put it almost poetically in Mein Kampf. The exact quote - though quite well known - eludes me at present, but suffice it to say that it perfectly describes how the Jews desire as many walls of opacity to work behind as they can possibly erect. So the more complex and confusing our world is, all the better for them to work their evil against us. This is one of the primary driving forces behind the advent of Big Government, which the Jews are always so keen to promote (at OUR expense of course).

Things have since unfortunately deteriorated beyond the point where the author's proposed solution would be of any help to us. It was a constructive suggestion 50 years ago perhaps, but is no longer applicable. We didn't take the necessary action when we should have. Our parents let us down just as we are now letting our own children down; consigning them to a life of slavery as a result of our indolence and apathy. For it is undeniably true that "an ounce of prevention is better than a pound of cure" - it's less messy for one thing. We didn't make the effort in prevention, so our only remaining option now is to CURE and that will be a much uglier job.

I believe it's fitting at this point to conclude this section with an apposite quote from Winston Churchill:

"If you draft 10,000 regulations, you destroy all respect for the law."

Too many laws, too much complexity. What are we going to do about it?

Huxley Warned Us: Part 14
Aldous Huxley:

"'Free as a bird', we say, and envy the winged creatures for their power of unrestricted movement in all the three dimensions. But, alas, we forget the dodo. Any bird that has learned how to grub up a good living without being compelled to use its wings will soon renounce the privilege of flight and remain forever grounded. Something analogous is true of human beings. If the bread is supplied regularly and copiously three times a day, many of them will be perfectly content to live by bread alone - or at least by bread and circuses alone. 'In the end', says the Grand Inquisitor in Dostoevsky's parable, 'in the end they will lay their freedom at our feet and say to us, "Make us your slaves, but feed us. '"

Isn't this closely analagous to the situation we find ourselves in today? In this couch-potato society, It certainly strikes Phaedrus that way. Though we expect rather more from life than just bread three times a day, it isn't THAT much more. The vast majority of people in the West constitute little more than a mindless peasant underclass that has resigned itself to the treadmill of daily life. People work for 50 years just to put food on the table and keep a roof over their heads, from what little they have left after the ravages of direct and indirect taxation and Jewish investment frauds like pension schemes.

Throughout history, it has regrettably proven to be the case that the peasants - in whichever country - will undergo the most dire privations at the hands of their exploitative masters before they are driven into taking effective action to overthrow the tyranny and oppression from which they suffer. They can be ground down by decades of maltreatment and forced almost to the point of starvation before they will rise up and overturn the established order of things. So the situation we find ourselves in today is entirely of our own collective making. We have what we deserve.

Of course this despairing assessment isn't the whole story. We have a peasantry of so many hundreds of millions of people in the West because the common people are kept in the dark as to their true potential by the omnipresent, Jew-controlled media which is keen to foster in them the idea that the status quo is beyond question and it's simply the way things are and have always been. This is the vital importance of 'entertainment' in the modern world. Every single minute we spend watching some trashy TV soap or reading some garbage newspaper is a minute taxed from our lives. It is a minute during which we simply do not question why the world is in such a dreadful mess and who is responsible for it.

The mainstream jewsmedia performs the role of the rodeo clown with impeccable aplomb. TV networks have developed highly successful techniques for ensuring that once we are watching a channel, we will continue to do so for far longer than we had intended and for far longer than is good for us. They've moved on quite a bit since the days of 'Don't touch that dial!' And all the while we are gawping at their mind-rotting drivel, the Jews know we are no threat to them. If we are ever to liberate our peasant classes from their servitude of the Jew and Jewish interests, then we must find a way to break the media's hold over enough of them for the bulk to follow. In short, we need to work towards achieving a critical mass of Jew-awareness.

Huxley Warned Us: Part 13
From Brave New World Revisited, 1958:

"In practice, as recent history has repeatedly shown, the right to vote, by itself, is no guarantee of liberty. Therefore, if you wish to avoid dictatorship by plebiscite, break up modern society's vast, machine-like collectives into self-governing, voluntarily co-operating groups, capable of functioning outside the bureaucratic systems of Big Business and Big Government. Overpopulation and over-organization have produced the modern metropolis, in which a fully human life of multiple personal relationships has become almost impossible. Therefore, if you wish to avoid the spiritual impoverishment of individuals and whole societies, leave the metropolis and revive the small country community, or alternatively humanize the metropolis by creating within its network of mechanical organizations the urban equivalents of small country communities, in which individuals can meet and co-operate as complete persons, not as the mere embodiments of specialized functions."

Note here that even in the America of the late 1950s, the author was already deeply suspicious of democracy and how it could be subverted by the interests of Big Business. We tend to look back misty-eyed on that seemingly halcyon era from our present standpoint and see it as the golden age of liberty, but it is evident from Huxley's concerns that it was already under threat. My personal belief is that the origins of this erosion of our freedoms had its seeds in our accepting large numbers of Jews fleeing the Nazis from 1930's europe. Something seems to have happened within a few years of the ending of WWII that vastly accelerated the cultural decline that had been simmering away since the 1920s when the numbers of Jews in positions of public influence (Hollywood excepted) was much lower.

The Jews we were foolishly good-hearted enough to welcome to our shores repaid our kindness by proceeding to gnaw away at this once-great country from the inside. They quickly wriggled their way into powerful positions of public influence and seized control of the mass media, and by so doing, the government itself. They enriched themselves at our expense and funneled huge amounts of our tax-dollars to that cancerous, running sore of the Middle East, Israel. Additionally, their appetite for blood had to be satiated by the sacrifice of great numbers of our young people in fighting foreign adventures that were of no benefit to us whatsoever. But with their guile, their determination and their self-belief in their "entitlement" to call all the shots, they somehow got away with it – and still do.

I can almost hear the call of every great civilization in history crying out to America in the late 1930: "Please, please, don't let these Devils in! Afford them no sanctuary! They may look like you and talk like you - they're very good at that - but they're evil! You let them into your great country and within 100 years it'll be nothing but a rotting corpse. These parasites will have eaten away everything you have worked for and totally destroyed your wealth, your way of life and cultural heritage. We beg you from our bitter experience of 3,000 years of dealings with these nomadic parasites: slay them while you still may, for if you fail, then in time they will lay your country waste! Take heed, America! Take heed!"

Pity we couldn't hear them.

Huxley Warned Us: Part 12
Aldous Huxley:

"Under the relentless thrust of accelerating overpopulation and increasing over-organization, and by means of ever more effective methods of mind-manipulation, the democracies will change their nature; the quaint old forms - elections, parliaments, Supreme Courts and all the rest - will remain. The underlying substance will be a new kind of non-violent totalitarianism. All the traditional names, all the hallowed slogans will remain exactly what they were in the good old days. Democracy and freedom will be the theme of every broadcast and editorial but democracy and freedom in a strictly Pickwickian sense. Meanwhile the ruling oligarchy and its highly trained elite of soldiers, policemen, thought-manufacturers and mind-manipulators will quietly run the show as they see fit."

Once again, time has proved the great visionary spot-on. The maintenance of these 'props of democracy' is simply a sham which purports to confer some legitimacy to what is wholly illegitimate. The US and many other Western countries are run on behalf of, and in the interests of, World Jewry. However it may appear and whatever our so-called 'leaders' tell us, that is what is ultimately behind the elaborate charade that democracy has become. The interests of you and me and our people count for nothing. We're just here to be taxed and to furnish them substance. Our so-called 'leaders' make promises they never keep just to get elected. Once elected, they get back to serving their true masters for their own naked self-enrichment and aggrandizement - and the rest of us can go to hell in a handbasket:

"How can we control the vast impersonal forces that now menace our hard-won freedoms? On the verbal level and in general terms, the question may be answered with the utmost ease. Consider the problem of overpopulation. Rapidly mounting human numbers are pressing ever more heavily on natural resources. What is to be done? Obviously we must, with all possible speed, reduce the birth rate to the point where it does not exceed the death rate. At the same time we must, with all possible speed, increase food production, we must institute and implement a world-wide policy for conserving our soils and our forests, we must develop practical substitutes, preferably less dangerous and less rapidly exhaustible than uranium, for our present fuels; and, while husbanding our dwindling resources of easily available minerals, we must work out new and not too costly methods for extracting these minerals from ever poorer and poorer ores - the poorest ore of all being sea water. But all this, needless to say, is almost infinitely easier said than done. The annual increase of numbers should be reduced. But how? We are given two choices - famine, pestilence and war on the one
hand, birth control on the other"

Of course the overpopulation problem has grown very much worse since Huxley wrote these words fifty years ago. A population reduction in the order of perhaps as much as 80% is now required. That's BILLIONS of people we're talking about. And this is what the agents of the NWO are secretively working towards. Clearly they're not interested in Huxley's birth control solution, as the flagrant encouragement of casual free sex and racial interbreeding in the popular media attests. That leaves us with famine, pestilence and war. No big surprise here! For a race of people that has always found the stench of rotting goyim flesh appealing, I think we could have seen it coming.

Phaedrus does not wish to appear like some Bible-thumping religious nut, but there is something disturbingly similar between Judaism and Satanism. Harold Rosenthal breezily admitted over 30 years ago (somewhat ill-advisedly in hindsight given the advent of the Internet) that the God of the Jews is actually Lucifer. When we see the works of these people given free reign, as in Palestine, it isn't difficult to form the view that there's something distinctly evil about them and their mindset. How the hell we permit such entities to have vast and over-arching influence in our day-to-day lives is one of world's great mysteries. THEY MUST BE STOPPED BEFORE THEY KILL US ALL.

Huxley Warned Us: Part 11
Aldous Huxley, 1958:

"Is individual freedom compatible with a high degree of individual suggestibility? Can democratic institutions survive the subversion from within of skilled mind-manipulators trained in the science and art of exploiting the suggestibility
both of individuals and of crowds? To what extent can the
inborn tendency to be too suggestible for one's own good or the good of a democratic society be neutralized by education?"

Critical questions indeed! To anyone listlessly surveying our contemporary scene of a half century later, it must appear at first sight that the battle for free thought and independent Will has already been lost. Such vast numbers of people appear to have permanently succumbed to the barrage of incessant propaganda that has crashed through our lives for so many decades. The masses really do appear to be completely brainwashed. However, we shall see that this bleak assessment is overly pessimistic by some considerable measure - thank God!

In Phaedrus' very extensive personal experience, the Politically-Correct quickly have their erroneous paradigm of the world shattered for good once confronted with the bare and unadulterated FACTS. The reason for this is that Politically-Correct dogma is grounded in falsehoods. It is a CONTRIVANCE. It is unable to stand up to any level of scrutiny and reason and quickly crumbles to pieces in the face of it. Thanking God, I can honestly state here that of the scores of persons I have confronted one-to-one personally, NOT A SINGLE ONE has left my presence still clinging to their former ideological baggage. NOT ONE!

It is remarkable but true. Notwithstanding the decades of non-stop propaganda through every conceivable Jewish-controlled medium both overt and subliminal; notwithstanding indoctrination by left-wing libertine perverts in our schools; notwithstanding lectures from appointees in our local and national government - notwithstanding all of this, the dogma of the United Nations, the politically-correct and the social engineers for all their exquisite research and ingenuity - for all that - the depth of penetration of this poisonous mindset on the average citizen is is little more than skin deep and as fragile as an eggshell!

I propose to go no further in this article to explain my favored technique for getting people to see sense (it was published here around last June and I will repost it again for those who cannot find it) as it is off-topic for this discussion on Huxley. Suffice it say here, that propaganda alone, unassisted by drugs, has never permanently damaged anyone's thinking beyond repair. Give me no more than one hour with 80% of people and I'll easily have them unplugged from the Matrix. But having said that, complacency will kill us. Though it IS a simple matter to free the minds of the people, this is dependent on us REACHING them in mass numbers. Until and unless we can get that vital message out, we still remain at grave risk of the permanent, blind enslavement Huxley foresaw:

"The nature of psychological compulsion is such that those who act under constraint remain under the impression that they are acting on their own initiative. The victim of mind-manipulation does not know that he is a victim. To him, the walls of his prison are invisible, and he believes himself to be free. That he is not free is apparent only to other people. His servitude is strictly objective." - AH.

Huxley Warned Us: Part 10
In this extract, Huxley addresses one of the Biggest Lies of the 20th Century - that all men are created equal.

Aldous Huxley, 1958:

"...The orgy of spying, lynching and judicial murder, which these wrong views about magic made logical and mandatory, was not matched until our own days, when the Communist ethic, based upon erroneous views about race, commanded and justified atrocities on an even greater scale. Consequences hardly less undesirable are likely to follow the general adoption of a Social Ethic, based upon the erroneous view that ours is a fully social species, that human infants are born uniform and that individuals are the product of conditioning by and within the collective environment. If these views were correct, if human beings were in fact the members of a truly social species, and if their individual differences were trifling and could be completely ironed out by appropriate conditioning, then, obviously, there would be no need for liberty and the State would be justified in persecuting the heretics who demanded it..."

Here the esteemed writer and visionary takes a distinct swipe against the founders of the United Nations. We have only this (presumably censored) Jewish version of his words from Random House Publishing to go by, but nevertheless it clear that Huxley had no time at all for Communist dogma and rounded repudiated it. It is only sad that we cannot study his original manuscript, for it is highly likely that he would have spelled out in no uncertain terms the inferior forms of life to which he merely alludes here in this 'sanitized version' - for it was written many years prior to the advent of political-correctness and has presumably been 'cleaned up' to avoid offense.

Huxley vehemently eschews the doctrine that all men would be equal in later life if they were each given the same opportunities from birth. Naturally, he tacitly refers to the Negro races here, to whose shortcomings Communism was intentionally blind. The UN/NWO official line is that all extended genetic phenotypes are essentially identical in all but superficial appearance. But we all - those of us in the REAL world that is - know as well as Huxley that there is a striking correlation between IQ and race, with the southern African Bantu coming out bottom of the pile. No amount of preferential, special schooling or 'positive discrimination' can make a silk purse out of a pig's ear. It's an uncomfortable FACT for our white Liberal friends that whilst nurture IS important, NATURE predominates and cannot be denied. A southern African Bantu (or one of its descendants now in Europe or America) can no more become an accomplished scientist, artist or writer, than can a mongrel puppy born in a stable can grow up a racehorse.

If we wish to learn the intrinsic capabilities of ANY race, we need merely to examine their cultural heritage; there's no need to make up stupid lies to pretend things are otherwise. The Negro, like the Jew and the Gypsy, have NOTHING to show for their much-vaunted cultures. They are all incapable of surviving by themselves. The Negroes are simply useless AT BEST, the Gypsies are mostly harmless but can be a dang nuisance at times, and the Jew..... Well, for the Jew I think we need a rather more exhaustive and intensive examination than this study of Huxley's prophecies allows!

Huxley Warned Us: Part 9
Aldous Huxley, 50 years ago in Brave New World Revisited:

"...That a dictator could, if he so desired, make use of [certain psychotropic chemicals] for political purposes is obvious. He could ensure himself against political unrest by changing the chemistry of his subjects' brains and so making them content with their servile conditions. He could use tranquillizers to calm the excited, stimulants to arouse enthusiasm in the indifferent, hallucinants to distract the attention of the wretched from their miseries.

"But how, it may be asked, will the dictator get his subjects to take the pills that will make them think, feel and behave in the ways he finds desirable? In all probability it will be enough merely to make the pills available. Today alcohol and tobacco are available, and people spend considerably more on these very unsatisfactory euphorics, pseudostimulants and sedatives than they are ready to spend on the education of their children."

We now know from secret experimental data released by Russia following a series of experiments carried out in the 1960s that adding fluoride to water supplies in concentrations of as little as 1ppm induces in subjects enhanced levels of susceptibility and compliance - a very useful tool indeed for any wayward government. Our so-called 'leaders' are still toying with the idea of introducing it into our drinking water on the grounds of improving dental health, notwithstanding that its psychotropic effects are becoming increasingly known.

So the big question is: could the dental health motive have been a mere pretext all along? Given that the discussion over fluoride remains on-going long after its mind-altering properties have been publicized, it seems quite likely. If there is one thing Huxley told us that we must never forget it is that our real enemies in the West are our governments. They are infinitely more dangerous to us than all the world's disparate terrorist groupings put together. Do we really know what they're injecting our kids with? Could there be more to it than simple vaccination?

Huxley Warned Us: Part 8
In Part 7, we were able to see how blanket control over the media had enabled the Jews to become the only game in town when it came to dissemination of information and that the alphabet soup of TV channels on offer that suggest the availability of free choice is simply an illusion. Virtually ALL the networks are pushing forward the NWO agenda by promoting the idea that free-trade, globalization and mass movements of peoples between countries is a Good Thing which brings jobs and prosperity. And whilst we dive headlong into embracing this cultural suicide, the really big gainers, as always, are the Jews. By acting as intermediaries, agents and obstacles between parties in international trade (a core business of this parasite going back Millenia) they can ALWAYS make a good living, regardless of how impoverished those poor fools competing for ever worsening living standards consequently become.
Huxley, 1958:

"In the West, democratic principles are proclaimed and many able and conscientious publicists do their best to supply electors with adequate information and to persuade them, by rational argument, to make realistic choices in the light of that information. All this is greatly to the good. But unfortunately propaganda in the Western democracies above all in America, has two faces and a divided personality. In charge of the editorial department there is often a democratic Dr Jekyll - a propagandist who would be very happy to prove that John Dewey had been right about the ability of human nature to respond to truth and reason. But this worthy man controls only a part of the machinery of mass communication.

"In charge of advertising we find an anti-democrat because anti-rational, Mr Hyde - or rather a Doctor Hyde, for Hyde is now a Ph.D. in psychology and has a master's degree as well in the Social Sciences. This Dr Hyde would be very unhappy indeed if everybody always lived up to John Dewey's faith in human nature. Truth and reason are Jekyll's affairs, not his . Hyde is a Motivation Analyst, and his business is to study human weaknesses and failings, to investigate those unconscious desires and fears by which so much of men's conscious thinking and overt doing is determined. And he does this, not in the spirit of the moralist who would like to make people better, or of the physician who would like to improve health, but simply in order to find out the best way to take advantage of their ignorance and to exploit their irrationality for the pecuniary benefit of his employers."

Here again, Huxley re-affirms his conviction that the mass media is working AGAINST the best interests of the people. His 'Dr. Hyde' character is alive and with us in the West today, too. Yet since we are now 50 years down the road from when Huxley penned his observations, the new Dr. Hyde of today has infinitely more techniques for deception in his armory. Fifty years of endless studies into what makes people tick in the most microscopic areas of their lives has yielded hundreds of thousands of documents and reports detailing every gleanable fact from the human psyche and how it may be ruthlessly and cynically manipulated to ensure that the naked greed of the Jew is to some extent at least satiated. And all this goes on with the full backing of Western governments, the leaders of which have become phenomenally wealthy for their tacit assistance in selling out the true interests of the people. So much for 'democracy.' So much for 'public service.'

Huxley Warned Us: Part 7
Aldous Huxley, 1958:

"Mass communication, in a word, is neither good nor bad; it is simply a force and, like any other force, it can be used either well or ill. Used in one way, the press, the radio and the cinema are indispensable to the survival of democracy. Used in another way, they are among the most powerful weapons in the dictator's armory. In the field of mass communications as in almost every other field of enterprise, technological progress has hurt the Little Man and helped the Big Man. As lately as [1910], every democratic country could boast of a great number of small journals and local newspapers. Thousands of country editors expressed thousands of independent opinions. Somewhere or other almost anybody could get almost anything printed.

"Today the press is still legally free; but most of the little papers have disappeared. The cost of wood-pulp, of modern printing machinery and of syndicated news is too high for the Little Man. In the totalitarian East there is political censorship, and the media of mass communication are controlled by the State. In the democratic West there is economic censorship and the media of mass communication are controlled by members of the Power Elite. Censorship by rising costs and concentration of communication-power in the hands of a few big concerns is less objectionable than State ownership and government propaganda; but certainly it is not something of which a Jeffersonian democrat could possibly approve.

"In regard to propaganda, the early advocates of universal literacy and a free press envisaged only two possibilities: the propaganda might be true, or it might be false. They did not foresee what in fact has happened, above all in our Western capitalist democracies - the development of a vast mass communications industry, concerned in the main neither with the true nor the false, but with the unreal, the more or less totally irrelevant. In a word, they failed to take into account man's almost infinite appetite for distractions."

Here we are, half a century on and this situation has, as one might reasonably expect, grown worse still. There was always some element of propaganda in Western media, even pre-Huxley, but it was nothing as remotely unremitting and omnipresent as it is today. Governments and large media organizations (increasingly one and the same entity) could have used their influence to bring about a better society, but they chose, by accident or design, to do the opposite. And the only place where genuine freedom of expression yet survives in on the Internet - and that may not be for very much longer if the powers that be have their way.

The media of today serves - almost without exception - the interests of 'Big Business' with its free trade and globalization agenda; selling out the interests of hard-working people for the VAST self-enrichment of what Huxley calls the 'Power Elite'. Eye-wateringly large sums are made by big business interests (read "Jews") which have asset-stripped this nation and others on an epic scale. The demise of the manufacturing heartlands of the northern midwest attest to this. Ruin, decay, family breakdown, drugs and crime have replaced ordered and prosperous communities. This is all solely due to the Jews' internationalist, borderless world where decent Americans are forced to compete with Chinese peasants and the like who sell their labor for little more than a bowl of rice a day.

The advertising element of the popular media has gotten totally out of control, too. Rather than satisfying consumers' genuine needs and desires as was once the case, it has become a dragon of a business model that festers on our worst fears and anxieties. We no longer buy useful products or services because we NEED them, we buy junk, mass-produced garbage by the shed-load in order to prove to our friends and neighbors that we're 'doing well' and have a 'comfortable lifestyle.' Every advertisement screams out to us that we're missing out on something; if we don't constantly and wantonly consume, there must be something fundamentally wrong in our lives.

Advertising media attempts to make us feel rotten and inadequate and instills in us a a sense of permanent dissatisfaction with every aspect of our existence. The impetus from this form of madness comes from the craven greed of a race of beings who can NEVER have enough and don't care what damage they do in going after it. The American dream was never about having a driveway stuffed full of sports utility vehicles. It was never about having a glamor model for a wife. It was never about taking 4 holidays a year. It was never about having a widescreen TV in every room spewing out its garbage. It was never about so much stuff that the Jews have convinced us, through their stranglehold over the mass media, is what we should be striving for.

If we could only break away from this madness, en-masse, and adopt the kind of lifestyle advocated by the likes of Emerson and Thoreau, the Tribe of Satan would be out of business in a flash. They'd never make a single cent out of us, just as they can't make a penny out of the Amish community. Maybe one day soon when the dollar collapses to Absolute Zero and folks wake up to the reality of the lies, the distortions, the fraud and deceit that's been perpetrated against us for decades, there'll come a realization that all the junk that the Jews told us was so desirable and indispensable wasn't worth jack. Then perhaps we can re-establish this broken, fucked-up society along decent lines. Until that happy day, keep those guns oiled.

Huxley warned Us: Part 6

Aldous Huxley writing in 'Brave New World Revisited' exactly 50 years ago:

"Jefferson said: 'If a nation expects to be ignorant and free
it expects what never was and never will be ... The people cannot be safe without information. Where the press is free, and every man able to read, all is safe.'"

He continues:

"Across the Atlantic another passionate believer in reason was thinking, about the same time, in almost precisely similar terms. Here is what John Stuart Mill wrote of his father, the utilitarian philosopher, James Mill: 'So complete was his reliance upon the influence of reason over the minds of mankind, whenever it is [attention-grabbing] distractions of the most fascinating nature are deliberately used as instruments of policy, for the purpose of preventing people from paying too much attention to the realities of the social and political situation.

"The other world of religion is different from the other world of entertainment; but they still resemble one another in being most decidedly 'not of this world'. Both are distractions and, if lived in too continuously, both can become, in Marx's phrase, 'the opium of the people' and so a threat to freedom. Only the vigilant can maintain their liberties, and only those who are constantly and intelligently on the spot can hope to govern themselves effectively by democratic procedures.

" A society, most of whose members spend a great part of their time not on the spot, not here and now and in the calculable future, but somewhere else, in the irrelevant other worlds of sport and soap opera, of mythology and metaphysical fantasy, will find it hard to resist the encroachments of those who would manipulate and control it."

Consider for a moment the incisive nature and power of this simple observation. Huxley at once within one and the same sentence correctly identifies the fundamental reasons behind the way we live today: a disingenuous, Jew-controlled media, an utterly corrupted government, and the masses of idle, ignorant, gullible propaganda-consumers.

Thankfully, you and I, Gentile reader, are not among this class of the intellectually impoverished. We have awoken to the threats that surround us. We are wise to the motivations of those behind it. It is our DUTY to ensure everyone else is likewise made aware of exactly what has been going on now for many decades. The only 'free press' today is the Internet. Out the Liars and murderers! To hell with them! Expose them all!

Huxley Warned Us: Part 5

Aldous Huxley, 1958:

"No people that passes abruptly from a state of subservience under the rule of a despot to the completely unfamiliar state of political independence can be said to have a fair chance of making democratic institutions work. Again, no people in a precarious economic condition has a fair chance of being able to govern itself democratically. [true freedom] flourishes in an atmosphere of prosperity and declines as declining prosperity makes it necessary for the government to intervene ever more frequently and drastically in the affairs of its subjects. Overpopulation and over-organization are two conditions which, as I have already pointed out, deprive a society of a fair chance of making democratic institutions work effectively. We see, then, that there are certain historical, economic, demographic and technological conditions which make it very hard for Jefferson's rational animals, endowed by nature with inalienable rights and an innate sense of justice, to exercise their reason, claim their rights and act justly within a democratically organized society. We in the West have been supremely fortunate in having been given our fair chance of making the great experiment in self-government. Unfortunately it now looks as though, owing to recent changes in our circumstances, this infinitely precious fair chance were being, little by little, taken away from us. And this, of course, is not the whole story. These blind impersonal forces are not the only enemies of individual liberty and democratic institutions. There are also forces of another, less abstract character, forces that can be deliberately used by power-seeking individuals whose aim is to establish partial or complete control over their fellows. Fifty years ago, when I was a boy, it seemed completely self-evident that the bad old days were over, that torture and massacre, slavery, and the persecution of heretics, were things of the past. Among people who wore top hats, traveled in trains, and took a bath every morning such horrors were simply out of the question. After all we were living in the twentieth century. A few years later these people who took daily baths and went to church in top hats were committing atrocities on a scale undreamed of by the benighted Africans and Asiatics. In the light of recent history it would be foolish to suppose that this sort of thing cannot happen again. It can and, no doubt, it will. But in the immediate future there is some reason to believe that the punitive methods of I984 will give place to the reinforcements and manipulations of Brave New World."

Huxley initially points out that democracy as it once was, in the long golden period following Independence in 1776, delivered the goods. The monolithic tenants of the Constitution had only recently been formulated and were at that time entirely safe from the kind of revisions and attacks from Jewish shyster lawyers for whom the sight of a successful, prosperous and peaceful country was to become simply unacceptable.

Hard working European people, their strong, principled leaders and 24 karat gold governance based on openness, integrity, free speech, individual liberty and carefully-drafted legal framework guaranteed the stunning success of young America. It swiftly rose to become the world's richest and most powerful country thanks entirely to the vision of the founding fathers and the hard work, honesty and enterprise of the northern European settlers who built a paradise on earth the like of which the world had never before seen.

Obviously, we all know what has happened since and who exactly it is that is responsible for our collective demise. Huxley in his day correctly predicted that the age of the 'social engineer' was about to commence. Out of the two great dystopian paths, it was more likely that in the drive to gain total control of the masses, the forces of darkness would opt for subtle mind-manipulation rather than outright physical brutality. And for many decades, this was indeed the way of things.

However, whilst social engineering (such as political-correctness and massive immigration, the encouragement of inter-racial breeding and the destruction of the family unit (and through this, society as a whole) have been the core techniques for the implementation of these changes, we have lately seen very much more ruthless methods coming into play which if permitted to continue, will eventually see the infinitely more menacing methodology of Nineteen Eighty-Four coming to fruition.

In fact we have already seen Orwellian developments growing at a pace - since Washington's NeoConmen took the helm 8 years ago. Extraordinary rendition, torture, pre-empitive strikes, the silencing of dissenting voices, the massive increase in the prison population, the use of agencies like the ATF and their sibling clone agencies to act as stormtroopers against America's own citizens. The entire process is now taking on a far more baleful dimension. Legislation is already on the shelf which would - at a stroke - turn America into a clone of 1930s Stalinist Russia. And all that is required is one single precipitating event to bring this about...

We will not have long to wait, either. The trigger might be a genuine external threat, it may be another false flag operation, or it may come from America's repeated provocation of Russia. Either which way, when it happens (and it WILL - and soon) we will have our remaining (already weakened) rights whisked away in the blink of an eye. What happens next will not be pretty. Untold thousands of good men will die and our lives will never be the same again. Our freedoms will be history - at least for a while - and if we do not prevail, our children and their children will be slaves in perpetuity.

But you know what? Maybe we deserve such a future, for we did NOTHING to nip this situation in the bud when the possibility to seize our country back without bloodshed was within our grasp. Now it's probably too late, without considerable loss of life, to do so. Our collective inaction means that when the day of reckoning comes, we'll have a FAR higher price to pay because we didn't act at the outset. it all points to an unavoidable blood bath in which very many of us will perish. Such is the price of early inaction.

Huxley Warned US: Part 4
See the preamble from Part 1 if you haven't already.

The joke of modern 'democracy'...

Aldous Huxley, Brave New World Revisited, 1958:

"In a capitalist democracy, such as the United States, [the entire economic process] is controlled by what Professor C. Wright Mills has called the 'Power Elite.' This Power Elite directly employs several millions of the country's work force in its factories, offices and stores, controls many millions more by lending them the money to buy its products and, through its ownership of the media of mass communication, influences the thoughts, the feelings and the actions of virtually everybody. To parody the words of Winston Churchill, never have so many been manipulated so much by so few. We are far indeed from Jefferson's ideal of a genuinely free society composed of a hierarchy of self governing units - 'the elementary republics of the wards, the county republics, the State republics and the Republic of the Union, forming a gradation of authorities.'

"We see, then, that modern technology has led to the concentration of economic and political power, and to the development of a society controlled (ruthlessly in the totalitarian states, politely and inconspicuously in the democracies) by Big Business and Big Government. But societies are composed of individuals and are good only in so far as they help individuals to realize their potentialities and to lead a happy and fruitful life. How have individuals been affected by the technological advances of recent years? Here is the answer to this question given by a philosopher-psychiatrist, Dr Erich Fromm: 'Our contemporary Western society, in spite of its material, intellectual and political progress, is increasingly less conducive to mental health, and tends to undermine the inner security, happiness, reason and the capacity for love in the individual; it tends to turn him into an automaton who pays for his human failure with increasing mental sickness, and with despair hidden under a frantic drive for work and so-called pleasure.' "

Well, nothing much has changed in the intervening 50 years, we can plainly see - save perhaps the intensity of this on-going manipulation.

Huxley correctly identifies that Big Government and Big Business are working hand-in-hand in a manner that brings nothing but ill for the broad mass of the population. Though purportedly working in OUR best interests, it is increasingly clear, even to those of little perception, that the government is doing quite the opposite and this outrageous state of affairs has been the norm for very many decades. Yet every few years, we shuffle like battery chickens into the polling booths in the delusion that our wishes and needs count for anything. We are simply rubber-stamping the authority of enemies who would happily throw our children into the jaws of ravenous wolves if it served their purposes. No one gets nominated for a shot at the presidency who isn't already pre-approved for the post by Jewish-controlled entities. Come November, we will be presented with the usual choice: a candidate who is slavishly pro-Israel (Obama) or one who is actively so (McCain). Either way, WE THE PEOPLE (for whom it's all supposed to be about) LOSE. Our democracy has been stolen. We get the last word; the final say; but it's meaningless because whoever wins, it's only ever another sock-puppet of Israel - then it's swiftly back to business as usual.

Huxley Warned Us: Part 3

In this 3rd part of this series on the predictions of Aldous Huxley, the great visionary bemoans the fact that in our increasingly overpopulated world, the people who constitute the principal component of the problem by producing the most children who will themselves go on to reproduce prodigiously; propagate poor quality genetic material and turn out huge numbers of biologically-inferior offspring. One can safely infer here that Huxley is referring to the Negro races. When you read the text below it leaves little room for doubt, in fact.

Common sense observations like this could be made freely 50 years ago at the time Huxley was writing, but just imagine the difficulty a professional person would encounter in re-iterating these simple truths today. They'd be branded as a Nazi or a eugenicist and God only knows what else. The result has been that the issue of differential breeding rates between the races and the population explosion cannot even be discussed! A time-bomb is ticking away that could eventually destroy the planet, yet political-correctness dictates we must remain silent on this, one of the most pressing of current issues.

Huxley, 1958:

"In the second half of the twentieth century, we do nothing systematic about our breeding; but in our random and unregulated way, we are not only overpopulating the planet, we are also, it would seem, making sure that these greater numbers shall be of biologically poorer quality. In the bad old days children with considerable, or even slight, hereditary defects rarely survived. Today, thanks to sanitation, modern pharmacology and the social conscience, most of the children born with hereditary defects reach maturity and multiply their kind. Under the conditions now prevailing, every advance in medicine will tend to be offset by a corresponding advance in the survival rates of individuals cursed by some genetic insufficiency. In spite of new wonder drugs and better treatment (indeed, in a certain sense, precisely because of these things), the physical health of the general population will show no improvement, and may even deteriorate. And along with a decline in average healthiness there may well go a decline in average intelligence. Indeed, some competent authorities are convinced that such a decline has already taken place and is continuing. 'Under conditions that are both soft and unregulated,' writes Dr W.H. Sheldon, 'our best stock tends to be out-bred by stock that is inferior to it in every respect ... It is the fashion in some academic circles to assure students that the alarm over differential birth-rates is unfounded; that these problems are merely economic, or merely educational, or merely religious, or merely cultural or something of the sort. This is Pollyanna optimism. Reproductive delinquency is biological and basic.' And he adds that 'nobody knows just how far the average IQ in this country (the USA) has declined since 1916, when Terman attempted to standardize the meaning of IQ 100."

In Phaedrus' opinion, the scientists who sit down and systematically analyze the result of various studies and reach conclusions which they KNOW will not be well received, must proclaim them honestly and fearlessly nevertheless. Not to do so would be a crime against Truth and another victory for the shadowy plotters behind the New World Order, AKA Jewish global domination and our continued, collective enslavement.

Huxley Warned Us: Part 2
Second in the series; to be read in conjunction with Phaedrus' Preamble of Part 1 published here on February 13.

Aldous Huxley:

"...Meanwhile impersonal forces over which we have almost no control seem to be pushing us all in the direction of the Brave New Worldian nightmare; and this impersonal pushing is being consciously accelerated by representatives of commercial and political organizations who have developed a number of new techniques for manipulating, in the interests of SOME MINORITY [my emphasis] the thoughts and feelings of the masses. The techniques of manipulation will be discussed in later chapters.

"For the moment let us confine our attentions to those impersonal forces which are now making the world so extremely unsafe for democracy, so very inhospitable to individual freedom. What are these forces? And why has the nightmare which I had projected into the [26th century], made so swift an advance in our direction? The answer to these questions must begin where the life of even the most highly civilized society has its beginnings - on the level of biology.

"On the first Christmas Day the population of our planet was about two hundred and fifty millions - less than half the population of modern China. Sixteen centuries later, when the Pilgrim Fathers landed at Plymouth Rock, human numbers had climbed to a little more than five hundred millions. By the time of the signing of the Declaration of Independence, world population had passed the seven hundred million mark. In 1931, when I was writing Brave New World, it stood at just under two billions. Today, only twenty-seven years later, there are two thousand eight hundred million of us. And tomorrow – what?"

Huxley's "tomorrow" is of course our today. And the current population of the world is (if I recall correctly) approximately six-and-a-half BILLION! In his sequel to Brave New World, Huxley goes on to describe how better and better drug treatments and cleaner water supplies and more effective disinfectants will only exacerbate the problem of gross human overpopulation (we'll see in detail what he has to say about this later). So when we read the widely-circulated reports about the agents of the New World Order planning to wipe out over 4 billion of us, perhaps we can see that there's some method in the madness, even though some of us reading these lines may be among the masses to be eliminated. Quite what the selection criteria for this future Cull comprise one can only speculate, as myself and others have done elsewhere.

However the fact remains that the world IS grossly overpopulated and far more precariously so now than when the aging Huxley observed it in 1958. In fact we are just starting to see now the onset of widespread food shortages he predicted elsewhere in BNWR. This has shown up in recent steeply rising food prices world-wide, and shortages of basic staples in places such as Africa and the far east. The author is also quite correct to refer to these mysterious forces as "impersonal" - for those behind them care not one jot about you or I, but only their own survival and enrichment. As we saw in Part 1, we have to wake up to the fact that our so-called 'leaders' are in fact our REAL enemies, and far more dangerous than any creation from their feverish collective imagination that they might, from time to time, conjure up to threaten us with.

Finally, note Huxley's supposed use of the term "some minority" in the first paragraph. I think we can all guess to whom he is referring here and I believe it is unlikely (having read much of the man) that he was quite so diplomatic in this original manuscript. However, the text we are studying here is sourced from the Random House edition of BNWR - and like most other publishing houses, Random House is totally owned and controlled by the Jews. I believe therefore that the temptation to tone down the original text was probably too much for them. Heaven knows how many other original manuscripts have been given the same treatment in the course of history in order to stifle the warnings they contain.

Huxley Warned Us: part 1
Preamble:

Aldous Huxley was one of the most outstanding visionaries of the 20th century. His predictions of the direction in which the world was heading have since been proven to be breathtakingly accurate. In 1932 Huxley penned his seminal masterpiece, 'Brave New World' - a novel depiction of a 'dystopian utopia' where the vast majority of the world's populace were genetically and socially-engineered slaves who labored quite contentedly in their ignorance, under the direction of a class of persons described as 'World Controllers' - an unelected elite who kept their underlings in willful subjugation via a combination of relentless subliminal propaganda, free sex, mindless, meaningless, undemanding entertainment and the distribution of a rewarding, 'feel-good' psychotropic drug.

This futuristic novel was set in the in the 26th century, by which time Huxley envisioned his predictions would most likely become reality. However, alarmed by the speed at which the dystopia he had described was coming to fruition, he was forced to accept that the likely arrival of Brave New World (for real) would in fact be much, much sooner than he had ever imagined. In1958 he wrote a sequel entitled: 'Brave New World Revisited'. In this reflective and recondite essay, he held up his prophecies to the transparent scrutiny afforded by the intervening 26 years of socio-political change. He concluded, much to his despair, that the nightmare world he had foreseen in the distant future was in reality "only just around the corner."

Now, fast-forward a further 50 years to 2008. Phaedrus herewith examines a series of extracts from Huxley's 1958 sequel to see exactly how far down the road to outright totalitarianism and slavish subservience we have traveled. The conclusions drawn are as alarming as one could possibly imagine and beg the questions: has a Brave New World been the agenda all along? Did Huxley merely PREDICT its inception? Or did he rather go no small way towards INSPIRING it? Perhaps some clues to this enigma will hopefully arise in the course of this series. Huxley wrote BNWR in the late 1950s - in a matter-of-fact style that was in those days refreshingly free from political-correctness. If you're queasy at the thought of Plain Truth, the best thing to do is shut down your computer and get back to Fox News. For everyone else, however, here we go with our first extract...

"...Omitted from the picture (not as being unimportant, but merely for convenience and because I have discussed them on earlier occasions) are the mechanical and military enemies of freedom - the weapons and gadgets which have so powerfully strengthened the hands of the world's rulers against their subjects, and the ever more ruinously costly preparations for ever more senseless and suicidal wars.

"The chapters that follow should be read against a background of thoughts about the Hungarian uprising and its repression, about the H-bombs, about the cost of what every nation refers to as 'defense', about those endless columns of uniformed boys, white, black, brown, yellow, marching obediently towards the common grave..."

Much of the above requires no elaboration, but it is interesting to note that Huxley refers to weapons and gadgets that have strengthened the hands of the world's rulers AGAINST (their own) subjects. How much more true is this today than it was 50 years ago? I think we can safely say the drive towards subjugating the world's populations has continued unabashed. Out of a combination of apathy and ignorance, we have permitted this process to be carried out against us. We COULD have stood up against it, but we didn't. We were warned. We have no excuses. And now the situation is worse than ever, and shows no sign of any immediate improvement. If Americans put McCain in the White House, then expect a Draft to follow shortly afterwards and we can once again kiss another generation of our kids goodbye. Someone once said (I believe it was Jefferson) that "The price of freedom is eternal vigilance." Regrettably, that price is one that collectively we have been unwilling to pay. In failing in our duty to ourselves and our children, therefore, we have created a situation in which the only way back to peace and normality is through bloody revolution, for it certainly cannot be achieved through the ballot box, as we all now know only too well, when the only voice of common sense and reason, Ron Paul, was quietly silenced by the crooked, Jew-controlled mainstream media.